+3.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 1,993 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
732 of 1,993tied with 84 others
Score vs region
+3.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
311 of 839tied with 30 others
Score vs county
+4.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
162 of 466tied with 18 others
Score vs similar-size group
+3.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,264 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,736 of 4,264tied with 142 others
Score vs state
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,325 of 7,646tied with 275 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.3 average for 1,993 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,264 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
50%vs 48.8% avg · +1.2 pts
Masters
25%vs 19.9% avg · +5.1 pts
Among 1,897 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
James Coble MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 1,993 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 732nd of 1,993 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 84 others).
James Coble MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 311th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 30 others).
James Coble MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 162nd of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 18 others).
James Coble MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,264 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,736th of 4,264 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 142 others).
James Coble MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement80 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,897 reporting
School Progress85 B+3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Closing the Gaps80 B+2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,834 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
James Coble MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,993 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
80
B
10
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
80
B
10
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level73%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Meets grade level50%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Masters grade level25%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level61%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level33%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level67%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Meets grade level43%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Masters grade level19%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Meets grade level53%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level64%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting
Meets grade level36%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting
Masters grade level20%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,993 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
711
Economically disadvantaged
62.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.9%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.6%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
James Coble MS
African American 46.3%
Hispanic 26.6%
White 8.6%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 13.5%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 reporting for every category shown · 1,993 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 50.2%
White 32.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,264 reporting for every category shown · 4,264 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.9%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
711
Economically disadvantaged students
446
Emergent bilingual students
92
Special education students
125
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
97
Students in TEA mobility denominator
809
TEA-published mobility rate
12%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 711 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 39 (5.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
711
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−39
Decrease · −5.2%
Change since 2021–22
−212
Decrease · −23.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
711
Selected comparison
619.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,958 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for James Coble MS
School year
Students enrolledJames Coble MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
923
First available year
632.9
2022–23
854
Decrease of 69 (7.5%)
638.1
2023–24
775
Decrease of 79 (9.3%)
635.4
2024–25
750
Decrease of 25 (3.2%)
632.1
2025–26
711
Decrease of 39 (5.2%)
619.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
204
25.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
575
71.52 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
804
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
25.4%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,527 rated schools reporting
+12.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
71.52
Selected comparison
29.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,651 rated schools reporting
+41.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for James Coble MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
997
89
8.9%
171
17.15
9.8%
19.5
2021–22
974
235
24.1%
661
67.86
12.7%
29.3
2022–23
905
212
23.4%
531
58.67
13.2%
31.5
2023–24
832
269
32.3%
712
85.58
13.1%
31.3
2024–25
804
204
25.4%
575
71.52
12.9%
29.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for James Coble MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
204
25.4%
575
71.52
12.9%
29.7
In-school suspensions
172
21.4%
403
50.12
11.5%
22.7
Out-of-school suspensions
97
12.1%
144
17.91
7.0%
10.3
DAEP placements
28
3.5%
28
3.48
5.0%
6
Mandatory DAEP placements
10
1.2%
10
1.24
3.5%
4.1
Discretionary DAEP placements
18
2.2%
18
2.24
2.8%
3.3
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
James Coble MS
Parent district: Mansfield ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,513
Selected comparison
$12,557
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 rated schools reporting
−$1,044 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,513 per student for this campus, $16,334 per student for its parent district, Mansfield ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
James Coble MS
Parent district: Mansfield ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,759
$11,552
$13,054
$7,929
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,196
$13,103
$13,108
$8,078
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,834 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,154
$14,760
$14,058
$8,672
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,325
$13,518
$14,797
$9,098
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,870 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,963
$12,626
$15,708
$10,412
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,709
$13,556
$16,792
$11,109
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,916 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,195
$14,418
$18,125
$12,009
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,513
$16,334
$18,972
$12,557
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$74,472+$8,059 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50+7.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3+0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
James Coble MS
1 to 5 years 22.9%
6 to 10 years 24.9%
11 to 20 years 33.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 reporting for every category shown · 1,993 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.2%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,264 reporting for every category shown · 4,264 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for James Coble MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classJames Coble MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
15.2
15
Secondary languages other than English
24.8
17.4
Secondary math
16
15.8
Secondary science
18.7
17.3
Secondary social studies
19.7
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220908045.