Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Jackson/Roosevelt ElemA90vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
Calhoun County · Region 03: Victoria · 812 students
Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.9 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
247 of 2,023tied with 63 others
Score vs region
+10.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria
Region 03: Victoria placement
16 of 129tied with 6 others
Score vs county
+2.6 ptsvs 87.4 average · 7 rated schools in Calhoun County
Score vs similar-size group
+9.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 3,667 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
713 of 3,667tied with 168 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.1 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.The current score is above the 87.4 average for 7 rated schools in Calhoun County.The current score is above the 80.9 average for 3,667 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 46.2% avg · +19.8 pts
Masters
35%vs 18.5% avg · +16.5 pts
Among 1,905 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.1 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 247th of 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria (tied with 6 others).
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.4 average for 7 rated schools in Calhoun County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 3,667 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 713th of 3,667 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 168 others).
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,905 reporting
School Progress91 A+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
Closing the Gaps87 B+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,885 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+13.7 vs similar economic context · 1,838 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+12.5 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
87
B
3
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level85%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Meets grade level66%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Masters grade level35%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Meets grade level68%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Masters grade level39%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Meets grade level62%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Masters grade level32%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Meets grade level69%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Masters grade level31%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
812
Economically disadvantaged
69.6%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
16.3%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.8%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.0%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
African American 0.5%
Hispanic 76.9%
White 19.3%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 2.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 56.3%
White 25.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
African American 6%
Hispanic 57.6%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.7%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Calhoun County · 7 reporting for every category shown · 7 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 62.1%
White 30.3%
Asian 3.5%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,667 reporting for every category shown · 3,667 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.3%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
810
Economically disadvantaged students
564
Emergent bilingual students
132
Special education students
136
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
51
Students in TEA mobility denominator
649
TEA-published mobility rate
7.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 812 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (2.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
812
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−24
Decrease · −2.9%
Change since 2021–22
−40
Decrease · −4.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
812
Selected comparison
638.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
School year
Students enrolledJackson/Roosevelt Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
852
First available year
651.6
2022–23
852
No change
659
2023–24
842
Decrease of 10 (1.2%)
657.4
2024–25
836
Decrease of 6 (0.7%)
654.7
2025–26
812
Decrease of 24 (2.9%)
638.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15
1.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
21
2.41 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
871
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.7%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,546 rated schools reporting
−11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.41
Selected comparison
30.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting
−28.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
909
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
919
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
904
21
2.3%
31
3.43
13.4%
32.3
2023–24
883
Suppressed
—
10
1.13
—
32.2
2024–25
871
15
1.7%
21
2.41
13.0%
30.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Jackson/Roosevelt Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
15
1.7%
21
2.41
13.0%
30.9
In-school suspensions
15
1.7%
20
2.30
11.6%
23.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
Parent district: Calhoun County ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,381
Selected comparison
$13,191
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
−$4,810 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,381 per student for this campus, $19,276 per student for its parent district, Calhoun County ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
Parent district: Calhoun County ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,190
$14,866
$13,054
$8,009
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,786
$13,307
$13,108
$8,164
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,189
$13,528
$14,058
$8,714
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,412
$13,779
$14,797
$9,213
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,656
$16,018
$15,708
$10,460
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,050
$17,629
$16,792
$11,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,670
$17,179
$18,125
$12,406
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,381
$19,276
$18,972
$13,191
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,754−$1,695 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+6.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.4+2.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Jackson/Roosevelt Elem
Beginning 7.9%
1 to 5 years 17.4%
6 to 10 years 9.5%
11 to 20 years 39.6%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 9.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
Beginning 7.1%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 15.4%
11 to 20 years 29.3%
21 to 30 years 17.1%
Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Calhoun County · 7 reporting for every category shown · 7 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 19.6%
6 to 10 years 11.6%
11 to 20 years 28.1%
21 to 30 years 24.7%
Over 30 years 9.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,667 reporting for every category shown · 3,667 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.7%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Jackson/Roosevelt Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classJackson/Roosevelt Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.4
18
Grade 1
17.1
18.2
Grade 2
18.1
18.4
Grade 3
20
18.6
Grade 4
19.4
18.9
Grade 5
18.7
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
7of 118
Reading — Masters
Region 03: Victoria · of the 118 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 114
Academic Growth
Region 03: Victoria · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
67of 1,905
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,905 that report this measure · tied with 12
96of 1,895
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,895 that report this measure · tied with 18
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 029901102.