Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
86 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus · Online school
iUniversity Prep
Grapevine-Colleyville ISD · 1,606 students
- Current score
- 92/1002025-26
- Change
- +4 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +0.5 ptsvs 91.5 average · 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 238 of 502tied with 54 others
- Score vs region
- +11.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
- Region 11: Fort Worth placement
- 90 of 839tied with 31 others
- Score vs county
- +12.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
- Tarrant County placement
- 53 of 466tied with 17 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +6.5 ptsvs 85.5 average · 832 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 140 of 832tied with 69 others
- Score vs state
- +10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.5 average for 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 85.5 average for 832 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 13 points
67 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −6.5 pts vs 6.5%
- 0% is 6.5 percentage points lower than the 6.5% average among 488 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st-lowest of 488 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 schools share that value.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
86 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 11.5 points above the 80.5 average among 839 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 13 points
67 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 80 is 4.9 points above the 75.1 average among 810 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 11: Fort Worth average
0% −14.8 pts vs 14.8%
- 0% is 14.8 percentage points lower than the 14.8% average among 814 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 814 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
86 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 12 points above the 80 average among 466 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 13 points
67 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 80 is 3.3 points above the 76.7 average among 455 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Tarrant County average
0% −17.2 pts vs 17.2%
- 0% is 17.2 percentage points lower than the 17.2% average among 456 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 456 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
86 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 6.5 points above the 85.5 average among 832 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 13 points
67 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
0% −20.6 pts vs 20.6%
- 0% is 20.6 percentage points lower than the 20.6% average among 819 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st-lowest of 819 similarly sized schools reporting this measure; 3 schools share that value.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
86 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 10.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 13 points
67 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
0% −16.7 pts vs 16.7%
- 0% is 16.7 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st-lowest of 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure; 22 schools share that value.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
iUniversity Prep is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.5 average for 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 238th of 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).
iUniversity Prep is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 90th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 31 others).
iUniversity Prep is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 53rd of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 17 others).
iUniversity Prep is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.5 average for 832 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 140th of 832 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 69 others).
iUniversity Prep is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 838th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 318 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 92 | 91.5 502 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 86 | 92.0 492 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 86 | 91.1 479 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 87 | 91.5 467 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 92.1 457 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- iUniversity Prep
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (502 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 92 | A | — |
| School Progress | 80 | B | 10 |
| Closing the Gaps | 93 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 77 | C | 3 |
| Relative Performance | 80 | B | 10 |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (502 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 99.6%+11.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 81 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+13.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+15.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 81 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 85.0%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 85.0% | 88.5% | −3.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 72.2% | 69.6% | +2.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 55.2% | 58.6% | −3.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 32.3% | 39.0% | −6.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 10.3% | 34.3% | −24.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 5.4% | 26.4% | −21.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.3% | −0.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 0.5% | −0.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 2.2% | 9.6% | −7.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 2.2% | −2.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 2.7% | 5.8% | −3.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.9% | 1.3% | −0.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 204
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 85
41.7% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 114
55.9% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 5
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 204
- Selected comparison
- 440.2
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 85
- Selected comparison
- 199.9
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 41.7%
- Selected comparison
- 48.6%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 55.9%
- Selected comparison
- 40.1%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 2.5%
- Selected comparison
- 11.2%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)12
- TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DIST (003626)6
- DALLAS COLLEGE DISTRICT (009331)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 1,606
- Economically disadvantaged
- 8.0%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 1.2%−9.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 3.3%−12.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 100.0%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
iUniversity Prep
- African American 7.7%
- Hispanic 18.9%
- White 55.2%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 11.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting for every category shown · 502 in full cohort
- African American 5%
- Hispanic 17.8%
- White 48.7%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 22.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
- African American 15.4%
- Hispanic 39.6%
- White 34.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison average For Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
- African American 21.3%
- Hispanic 45.2%
- White 22.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 832 reporting for every category shown · 832 in full cohort
- African American 13.1%
- Hispanic 51.2%
- White 24.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 7.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 1,606
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 128
- Emergent bilingual students
- 19
- Special education students
- 53
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 91
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 1,461
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 6.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,606 students in 2025–26, an increase of 191 (13.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 1,606
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +191
Increase · +13.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- +266
Increase · +19.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 1,606
- Selected comparison
- 867.2
| School year | Students enrollediUniversity Prep | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 1,340 | First available year | 874.6 |
| 2022–23 | 1,252 | Decrease of 88 (6.6%) | 893.3 |
| 2023–24 | 1,332 | Increase of 80 (6.4%) | 885.4 |
| 2024–25 | 1,415 | Increase of 83 (6.2%) | 877.4 |
| 2025–26 | 1,606 | Increase of 191 (13.5%) | 867.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 1,460
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 1,237 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 1,365 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 1,284 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 1,364 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 1,460 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- iUniversity Prep
- Parent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $4,727
- Selected comparison
- $10,744
For 2025, TEA reported $4,727 per student for this campus, $16,051 per student for its parent district, Grapevine-Colleyville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | iUniversity Prep | Parent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $4,453 | $18,978 | $13,054 | $7,238 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $4,257 | $16,422 | $13,108 | $7,322 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $4,680 | $15,562 | $14,058 | $7,627 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $4,482 | $16,369 | $14,797 | $8,248 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $4,449 | $16,148 | $15,708 | $9,419 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $5,036 | $16,187 | $16,792 | $9,497 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $5,002 | $15,750 | $18,125 | $10,156 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 479 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $4,727 | $16,051 | $18,972 | $10,744 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $78,199+$8,768 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 43−13.5 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 37.8+23.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
iUniversity Prep
- Beginning 0.9%
- 1 to 5 years 4.7%
- 6 to 10 years 21.9%
- 11 to 20 years 53.2%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting for every category shown · 502 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.3%
- 1 to 5 years 23.7%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 31.6%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24%
- 6 to 10 years 20.6%
- 11 to 20 years 30%
- 21 to 30 years 16.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 24%
- 6 to 10 years 20.5%
- 11 to 20 years 29.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.3%
- Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 832 reporting for every category shown · 832 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 26.2%
- 6 to 10 years 20.6%
- 11 to 20 years 29.2%
- 21 to 30 years 14.6%
- Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classiUniversity Prep · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 46 | 22.4 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 32.3 | 21.5 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 2 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 7,366
Attendance
Texas average · of the 7,366 that report this measure · tied with 18 · full ranking
-
1of 7,358
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · full ranking
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
3of 830
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 830 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
-
6of 456
Reading — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 3
-
9of 64
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Tarrant County (standard accountability only) · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
-
12of 399
Science — Approaches
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
14of 399
Science — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 3
-
17of 457
All Subjects — Approaches
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 4
-
19of 399
Science — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 3
-
24of 457
All Subjects — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 5
-
44of 810
Math — Approaches
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 15
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220906007.