Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Ischool High - Atascocita

Texas College Preparatory Academies · Houston · 158 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+12.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
6 of 64tied with 3 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.7 average for 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

89 to 95 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 95 is 12.3 points above the 82.7 average among 64 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 8 points

83 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 8 points above the 83 average among 64 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

96 +17.5 pts vs 78.5

  • 96 is 17.5 points above the 78.5 average among 62 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 62 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 charter campuses share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ischool High - Atascocita is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 6th of 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageIschool High - Atascocita 9394938995 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9582.7 64 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8983.2 59 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9382.2 58 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9483.0 55 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9384.3 49 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+8.0 vs similar economic context · 64 reporting
  • School Progress96 A+17.5 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+12.4 vs similar economic context · 61 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+12.8 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
  • Relative Performance96 A+20.2 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
  • Ischool High - Atascocita
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (64 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress96A—
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance96A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (96), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Meets grade level88%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Meets grade level92%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (64 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−56.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−51.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−47.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.6%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+21.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%78.4%+21.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course81.3%56.9%+24.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA56.3%41.1%+15.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%14.2%−14.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course75.0%35.6%+39.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%4.4%−4.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.3%−0.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree31.3%8.1%+23.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%7.1%−7.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%1.9%−1.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%5.7%−5.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%2.2%−2.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
158
Economically disadvantaged
36.1%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.2%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.3%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.6%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ischool High - Atascocita

African American: 20.3%Hispanic: 44.3%White: 26.6%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 3.8%Pacific Islander: 0.6%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 20.3%
  • Hispanic 44.3%
  • White 26.6%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 3.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort

African American: 11.9%Hispanic: 37.1%White: 38.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 7.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 11.9%
  • Hispanic 37.1%
  • White 38.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 7.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
158
Economically disadvantaged students
57
Emergent bilingual students
13
Special education students
10

Early college pathways

Early College High School
158

TEA-published share: 100%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
33
Students in TEA mobility denominator
167
TEA-published mobility rate
19.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 158 students in 2025–26, an increase of 10 (6.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
158

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+10

Increase · +6.8%

Change since 2021–22
+141

Increase · +829.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
158
Selected comparison
519.9

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ischool High - Atascocita
School yearStudents enrolledIschool High - AtascocitaChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 17 First available year 424.5
2022–23 90 Increase of 73 (429.4%) 459.2
2023–24 127 Increase of 37 (41.1%) 486.6
2024–25 148 Increase of 21 (16.5%) 499.7
2025–26 158 Increase of 10 (6.8%) 519.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
167

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ischool High - Atascocita
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2021–22 39 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 104 Suppressed — 10 9.62 — 15
2023–24 160 Suppressed — 14 8.75 — 13.4
2024–25 167 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ischool High - Atascocita in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$20k$31k202220242025
  • Ischool High - Atascocita
  • Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,291
Selected comparison
$13,103

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting

−$3,812 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,291 per student for this campus, $11,086 per student for its parent district, Texas College Preparatory Academies, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearIschool High - AtascocitaParent district: Texas College Preparatory AcademiesTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2022$29,268$9,545$15,708$10,441 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$12,043$10,993$16,792$10,409 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$9,445$11,083$18,125$11,933 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$9,291$11,086$18,972$13,103 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$58,381−$1,235 vs similar economic context
Teachers
7−25.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
22.6+2.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ischool High - Atascocita

Beginning: 14.3%1 to 5 years: 57.1%6 to 10 years: 28.6%
  • Beginning 14.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 57.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.6%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort

Beginning: 14%1 to 5 years: 42%6 to 10 years: 20.7%11 to 20 years: 16.5%21 to 30 years: 6.3%Over 30 years: 0.6%
  • Beginning 14%
  • 1 to 5 years 42%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.3%
  • Over 30 years 0.6%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

5 measures

  • 1of 170

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 170 that report this measure

  • 1of 163

    Science — Meets

    Similar size · of the 163 that report this measure

  • 1of 64

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 62

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 62

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 170

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 170 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 64

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure

  • 3of 163

    Science — Masters

    Similar size · of the 163 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 90

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

  • 3of 90

    Earned an associate degree

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

  • 3of 63

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 63 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

6 measures

  • 5of 125

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar size · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 48

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 48 that report this measure

  • 7of 90

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

  • 8of 62

    Academic Growth

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 48

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 48 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 33

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 33 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 44of 788

    Science — Approaches

    Texas charter average · of the 788 that report this measure · tied with 10

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221801076.