Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 7 points
74 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 81 is 7.7 points above the 73.3 average among 57 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus
Ischool-Creekside
Texas College Preparatory Academies · Tomball · 117 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 86/1002025-26
- Change
- −5 ptssince 2022-23
- Score vs similar economic context
- +3.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 27 of 60tied with 4 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +3.7 ptsvs 82.3 average · 142 similarly sized rated charter campuses
- Similar size placement
- 63 of 142tied with 5 others
- Score vs state
- +4.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
- Texas charter placement
- 335 of 829tied with 30 others
B86
At a glance
The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 82.7 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.3 average for 142 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Top placement
Social Studies — Masters
68% 1st of 44 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Social Studies — Meets
100% 1st of 44 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 7 points
74 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 81 is 3.9 points above the 77.1 average among 116 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Top placement
Social Studies — Masters
68% 1st of 110 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Social Studies — Meets
100% 1st of 110 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 7 points
74 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 81 is 7 points above the 74 average among 784 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Top placement
Social Studies — Meets
100% Tied for 1st of 548 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Social Studies — Masters
68% 3rd of 548 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Ischool-Creekside is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 27th of 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).
Ischool-Creekside is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.3 average for 142 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 5 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 63rd of 142 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 5 others).
Ischool-Creekside is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 5 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 335th of 829 rated Texas charter campuses (tied with 30 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
4 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 86 | 82.7 60 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 85 | 84.0 55 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 91 | 83.5 54 reporting | 79.5 776 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 91 | 85.4 53 reporting | 79.6 749 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Ischool-Creekside
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 82 | B | 8 |
| School Progress | 84 | B | 6 |
| Closing the Gaps | 91 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 81 | B | 9 |
| Relative Performance | 84 | B | 6 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (84), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 84.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 0.0%−50.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%−52.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%−46.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 73.0%−13.6 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 73.0% | 86.6% | −13.6 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 68.2% | 71.5% | −3.3 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 68.2% | 54.6% | +13.6 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 9.1% | 12.4% | −3.3 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 59.1% | 44.7% | +14.4 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 4.5% | 3.9% | +0.6 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 9.1% | 12.0% | −2.9 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 2.8% | −2.8 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 0.1% | −0.1 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 4.5% | 3.3% | +1.2 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 1.4% | −1.4 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 117
- Economically disadvantaged
- 27.4%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 6.8%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 6.8%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.1%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 21.3%+7.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Ischool-Creekside
- African American 6.8%
- Hispanic 38.5%
- White 41.9%
- Asian 6.8%
- Two or More Races 6%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort
- African American 9.5%
- Hispanic 36%
- White 38.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 10%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.4%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 62.8%
- White 14.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 117
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 32
- Emergent bilingual students
- 8
- Special education students
- 8
Early college pathways
- Early College High School
- 117
TEA-published share: 100%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 58
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 171
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 33.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 117 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 13 (10.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 117
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −13
Decrease · −10.0%
- Change since 2022–23
- +60
Increase · +105.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 117
- Selected comparison
- 525.2
| School year | Students enrolledIschool-Creekside | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022–23 | 57 | First available year | 436.1 |
| 2023–24 | 116 | Increase of 59 (103.5%) | 493.7 |
| 2024–25 | 130 | Increase of 14 (12.1%) | 500 |
| 2025–26 | 117 | Decrease of 13 (10.0%) | 525.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 30
17.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 46
27.06 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 170
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 17.6%
- Selected comparison
- 6.9%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 27.06
- Selected comparison
- 10.1
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022–23 | 90 | 17 | 18.9% | 23 | 25.56 | 7.7% | 12.4 |
| 2023–24 | 147 | 33 | 22.4% | 62 | 42.18 | 6.8% | 11.2 |
| 2024–25 | 170 | 30 | 17.6% | 46 | 27.06 | 6.9% | 10.1 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 30 | 17.6% | 46 | 27.06 | 6.9% | 10.1 |
| In-school suspensions | 28 | 16.5% | 35 | 20.59 | 4.7% | 6.1 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | 10 | 5.88 | — | 6.7 |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Ischool-Creekside
- Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $8,577
- Selected comparison
- $10,478
For 2025, TEA reported $8,577 per student for this campus, $11,086 per student for its parent district, Texas College Preparatory Academies, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Ischool-Creekside | Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $16,285 | $10,993 | $16,792 | $9,816 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2024 | $8,582 | $11,083 | $18,125 | $10,034 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2025 | $8,577 | $11,086 | $18,972 | $10,478 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $61,694+$4,492 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 8−25.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 15.1−19.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Ischool-Creekside
- Beginning 12.8%
- 1 to 5 years 38.5%
- 6 to 10 years 24.4%
- 11 to 20 years 24.4%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort
- Beginning 11.7%
- 1 to 5 years 43.7%
- 6 to 10 years 21.8%
- 11 to 20 years 14.5%
- 21 to 30 years 5.9%
- Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- Beginning 13.3%
- 1 to 5 years 42.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 17%
- 21 to 30 years 5.6%
- Over 30 years 1.8%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classIschool-Creekside · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary languages other than English | 22 | 16.4 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
9 measures
-
1of 822
Math — Approaches
Texas charter average · of the 822 that report this measure · tied with 8
-
1of 548
Social Studies — Meets
Texas charter average · of the 548 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 142
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 142 that report this measure
-
1of 142
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 142 that report this measure
-
1of 141
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 141 that report this measure
-
1of 110
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 110 that report this measure
-
1of 59
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 57
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
1of 44
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
-
2of 142
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 142 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 87
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar size · of the 87 that report this measure
-
3of 142
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 142 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
-
4of 134
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 134 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 87
Earned an associate degree
Similar size · of the 87 that report this measure
-
5of 87
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar size · of the 87 that report this measure
-
7of 30
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 30 that report this measure
-
9of 142
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 142 that report this measure
-
9of 134
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 134 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 30
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 30 that report this measure
-
9of 14
Dropout Rate (lowest is best)
Similar size (standard accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221801080.