+4.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
676 of 1,930tied with 70 others
Score vs region
+6.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
186 of 650tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+1.0 ptsvs 84 average · 16 rated schools in Kerr County
Kerr County placement
8 of 16tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+4.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 2,101 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
783 of 2,101tied with 74 others
Score vs state
+3.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,064 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B85
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 84 average for 16 rated schools in Kerr County.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 2,101 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 50.2% avg · +4.8 pts
Masters
28%vs 20.8% avg · +7.2 pts
Among 1,852 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Ingram MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 676th of 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 70 others).
Ingram MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 186th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 18 others).
Ingram MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 16 rated schools in Kerr County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 16 rated schools in Kerr County (tied with 2 others).
Ingram MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 2,101 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 783rd of 2,101 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 74 others).
Ingram MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,852 reporting
School Progress89 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,845 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,828 reporting
Academic Growth69 D−5.5 vs similar economic context · 1,792 reporting
Relative Performance89 B+9.5 vs similar economic context · 1,845 reporting
Ingram MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,930 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
69
D
1
Relative Performance
89
B
1
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so
Student Achievement (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting
Meets grade level55%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting
Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Meets grade level59%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Masters grade level35%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
Meets grade level52%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
Masters grade level22%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
Meets grade level57%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
Masters grade level31%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Meets grade level48%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Masters grade level23%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,930 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
262
Economically disadvantaged
58.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.3%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.1%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.1%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Ingram MS
Hispanic 46.9%
White 50.4%
Asian 0.8%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting for every category shown · 1,930 in full cohort
African American 10.2%
Hispanic 47.1%
White 35.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Kerr County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
African American 1.3%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 48.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,101 reporting for every category shown · 2,101 in full cohort
African American 10.3%
Hispanic 51.3%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
262
Economically disadvantaged students
154
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
58
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
49
Students in TEA mobility denominator
299
TEA-published mobility rate
16.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 262 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (3.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
262
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−8
Decrease · −3.0%
Change since 2021–22
−7
Decrease · −2.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
262
Selected comparison
631
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Ingram MS
School year
Students enrolledIngram MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
269
First available year
636.5
2022–23
279
Increase of 10 (3.7%)
641
2023–24
278
Decrease of 1 (0.4%)
640.2
2024–25
270
Decrease of 8 (2.9%)
637.8
2025–26
262
Decrease of 8 (3.0%)
631
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
19
6.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
41
13.71 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
299
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.3%
Selected comparison
12.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 rated schools reporting
−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
13.71
Selected comparison
28.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,586 rated schools reporting
−14.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ingram MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
284
33
11.6%
54
19.01
9.7%
18.8
2021–22
296
28
9.5%
54
18.24
12.4%
28
2022–23
291
Suppressed
—
14
4.81
—
29.9
2023–24
309
11
3.6%
19
6.15
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
299
19
6.3%
41
13.71
12.5%
28.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ingram MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
19
6.3%
41
13.71
12.5%
28.1
In-school suspensions
10
3.3%
14
4.68
11.2%
21.7
Out-of-school suspensions
11
3.7%
15
5.02
6.5%
9.3
DAEP placements
11
3.7%
12
4.01
4.8%
5.6
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Ingram MS
Parent district: Ingram ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,486
Selected comparison
$12,435
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
−$3,949 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,486 per student for this campus, $21,171 per student for its parent district, Ingram ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Ingram MS
Parent district: Ingram ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,957
$11,359
$13,054
$7,920
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,817
$11,588
$13,108
$8,095
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,705
$12,423
$14,058
$8,694
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,448
$14,622
$14,797
$9,064
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,814
$16,943
$15,708
$10,439
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,826 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,655
$22,554
$16,792
$10,997
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,935
$22,122
$18,125
$11,794
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,486
$21,171
$18,972
$12,435
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,509+$1,030 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−18.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.2−8.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Ingram MS
1 to 5 years 10.7%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 32.6%
21 to 30 years 28.8%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting for every category shown · 1,930 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 25.3%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Kerr County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 19.6%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 19.9%
Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,101 reporting for every category shown · 2,101 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 4.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ingram MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classIngram MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
21.3
17.5
Secondary English
20.7
14.8
Secondary languages other than English
9.2
17.3
Secondary math
20.2
15.7
Secondary science
20.5
17.2
Secondary social studies
24.7
17.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
19 measures
4of 15
Attendance
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
4of 14
School Progress
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
4of 14
Relative Performance
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
4of 14
Reading — Masters
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
4of 14
Math — Masters
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
4of 13
Science — Masters
Kerr County · of the 13 that report this measure
5of 15
All Subjects — Masters
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
5of 14
Math — Meets
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
5of 13
Science — Meets
Kerr County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 15
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
6of 13
Science — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 13 that report this measure
8of 16
Overall score
Kerr County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 15
Student Achievement
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
8of 14
Reading — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 14
Reading — Meets
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 15
All Subjects — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 15
All Subjects — Meets
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
9of 14
Closing the Gaps
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 14
Math — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 133904042.