−18.4 ptsvs 81.4 average · 178 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
166 of 178tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
−17.7 ptsvs 80.7 average · 193 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
178 of 193tied with 1 other
Score vs state
−18.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
775 of 829tied with 3 others
D63
At a glance
The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 81.4 average for 178 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.7 average for 193 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
21.3%−5.1 pts vs 26.4%
21.3% is 5.1 percentage points lower than
the 26.4% average among 172 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
ILTexas Pearland 6-8 is rated D by TEA, scoring 63 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.4 average for 178 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 166th of 178 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
ILTexas Pearland 6-8 is rated D by TEA, scoring 63 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average for 193 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 3 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 178th of 193 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 1 other).
ILTexas Pearland 6-8 is rated D by TEA, scoring 63 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 3 points since 2024-25.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement62 D−17.4 vs similar economic context · 178 reporting
School Progress64 D−17.8 vs similar economic context · 177 reporting
Closing the Gaps60 D−17.8 vs similar economic context · 170 reporting
Academic Growth64 D−9.5 vs similar economic context · 161 reporting
Relative Performance60 D−20.6 vs similar economic context · 175 reporting
ILTexas Pearland 6-8
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (178 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
62
D
8
School Progress
64
D
6
Closing the Gaps
60
D
10
Academic Growth
64
D
6
Relative Performance
60
D
10
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (64), so
Student Achievement (62) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 64.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level60%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Meets grade level30%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Masters grade level10%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level68%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Meets grade level42%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Masters grade level19%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level59%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 reporting
Meets grade level24%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 reporting
Masters grade level5%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level51%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 172 reporting
Meets grade level20%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 172 reporting
Masters grade level8%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 172 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level44%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 reporting
Meets grade level15%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 reporting
Masters grade level3%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (178 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
244
Economically disadvantaged
68.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
22.1%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.3%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.6%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
21.3%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
ILTexas Pearland 6-8
African American 41%
Hispanic 45.5%
White 4.1%
Asian 4.5%
Two or More Races 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting for every category shown · 178 in full cohort
African American 19.7%
Hispanic 60.6%
White 12.4%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 193 reporting for every category shown · 193 in full cohort
African American 21.4%
Hispanic 58.6%
White 12.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
244
Economically disadvantaged students
166
Emergent bilingual students
54
Special education students
52
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
69
Students in TEA mobility denominator
229
TEA-published mobility rate
30.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 244 students in 2025–26, an increase of 47 (23.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
244
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+47
Increase · +23.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
244
Selected comparison
488.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for ILTexas Pearland 6-8
School year
Students enrolledILTexas Pearland 6-8
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25
197
First available year
484.4
2025–26
244
Increase of 47 (23.9%)
488.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
53
23.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
144
64.29 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
224
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
23.7%
Selected comparison
9.5%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 rated charter campuses reporting
+14.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
64.29
Selected comparison
15.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
+48.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for ILTexas Pearland 6-8
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25
224
53
23.7%
144
64.29
9.5%
15.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for ILTexas Pearland 6-8 in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
53
23.7%
144
64.29
9.5%
15.6
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
13
5.80
—
7.5
Out-of-school suspensions
53
23.7%
119
53.13
8.1%
11.2
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
12
5.4%
12
5.36
3.5%
3.5
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
12
5.4%
12
5.36
3.3%
3.3
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
ILTexas Pearland 6-8
Parent district: International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas)
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,044
Selected comparison
$11,669
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated charter campuses reporting
−$625 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,044 per student for this campus, $18,074 per student for its parent district, International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas), $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
ILTexas Pearland 6-8
Parent district: International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas)
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2025
$11,044
$18,074
$18,972
$11,669
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,881+$85 vs similar economic context
Teachers
18−10.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−5.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
ILTexas Pearland 6-8
Beginning 18.6%
1 to 5 years 56.3%
6 to 10 years 6%
11 to 20 years 19.1%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting for every category shown · 178 in full cohort
Beginning 15.5%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 15.6%
21 to 30 years 4.1%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 193 reporting for every category shown · 193 in full cohort
Beginning 11.9%
1 to 5 years 40.6%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 17.1%
21 to 30 years 5.8%
Over 30 years 1.8%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for ILTexas Pearland 6-8 in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classILTexas Pearland 6-8 · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
15.3
22.2
Secondary English
13.4
16.4
Secondary languages other than English
13.7
15.8
Secondary math
11.5
16.3
Secondary science
16.3
17.5
Secondary social studies
16.3
18.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057848040.