+4.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 244 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
90 of 244tied with 11 others
Score vs similar-size group
+4.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 449 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
175 of 449tied with 15 others
Score vs state
+4.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
335 of 829tied with 30 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 244 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 449 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 47.3% avg · +10.7 pts
Masters
23%vs 17.6% avg · +5.4 pts
Among 244 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 244 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 90th of 244 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 449 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 175th of 449 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 15 others).
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement87 B+9.3 vs similar economic context · 244 reporting
School Progress90 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 243 reporting
Closing the Gaps78 C+0.6 vs similar economic context · 237 reporting
Academic Growth64 D−9.1 vs similar economic context · 227 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+9.5 vs similar economic context · 241 reporting
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (244 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
87
B
3
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
78
C
2
Academic Growth
64
D
6
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (87) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level75%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
Meets grade level45%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
Masters grade level16%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
Meets grade level58%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
Masters grade level23%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 reporting
Meets grade level31%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 reporting
Masters grade level9%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 238 reporting
Meets grade level49%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 238 reporting
Masters grade level17%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 238 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 169 reporting
Meets grade level39%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 169 reporting
Masters grade level11%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 169 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (244 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
88.9%+18.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 75 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
94.4%+27.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 74 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
98.5%+38.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 75 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%−0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 75 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
83.6%
+16.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 104 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
93.8%
72.3%
+21.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
93.8%
36.6%
+57.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
79.7%
24.8%
+54.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
15.0%
−15.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
12.2%
−12.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.4%
−0.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
1.6%
3.9%
−2.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
1.6%
1.4%
+0.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
12.5%
7.4%
+5.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.6%
1.9%
−0.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
52
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
38
73.1% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
13
25.0% of graduates
Not trackable
1
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
52
Selected comparison
68.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
38
Selected comparison
33.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
73.1%
Selected comparison
45.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
+27.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
25.0%
Selected comparison
49.0%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
−24.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
1.9%
Selected comparison
5.2%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
−3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
TEXAS A&M UNIV-SAN ANTONIO (042485)10
U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
704
Economically disadvantaged
74.1%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.6%−11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.8%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.0%−10.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
African American 2.3%
Hispanic 90.6%
White 4.7%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.4%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting for every category shown · 244 in full cohort
African American 19.4%
Hispanic 67.4%
White 8.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 449 reporting for every category shown · 449 in full cohort
African American 15.5%
Hispanic 65.7%
White 9.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
704
Economically disadvantaged students
522
Emergent bilingual students
138
Special education students
104
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
87
Students in TEA mobility denominator
758
TEA-published mobility rate
11.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 704 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (1.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
704
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−11
Decrease · −1.5%
Change since 2021–22
−8
Decrease · −1.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
704
Selected comparison
492.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
School year
Students enrolledIDEA South Flores College Preparatory
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
712
First available year
488.7
2022–23
726
Increase of 14 (2.0%)
500
2023–24
740
Increase of 14 (1.9%)
492.6
2024–25
715
Decrease of 25 (3.4%)
495.7
2025–26
704
Decrease of 11 (1.5%)
492.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
752
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
771
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
757
18
2.4%
20
2.64
10.1%
16.2
2022–23
811
20
2.5%
22
2.71
10.8%
18.2
2023–24
808
Suppressed
—
11
1.36
—
18.2
2024–25
752
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for IDEA South Flores College Preparatory in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,401
Selected comparison
$11,537
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 237 rated charter campuses reporting
+$864 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,401 per student for this campus, $14,202 per student for its parent district, IDEA Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,562
$10,855
$13,054
$8,168
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$10,616
$11,089
$13,108
$8,599
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$11,318
$11,676
$14,058
$9,426
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 191 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$11,105
$11,823
$14,797
$9,417
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 208 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$12,635
$13,328
$15,708
$10,742
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 214 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$12,247
$12,890
$16,792
$11,129
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 221 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,360
$13,294
$18,125
$11,640
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 229 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$12,401
$14,202
$18,972
$11,537
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 237 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,947+$2,679 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+17.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.3−2.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
IDEA South Flores College Preparatory
Beginning 8.7%
1 to 5 years 71.2%
6 to 10 years 17.6%
11 to 20 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting for every category shown · 244 in full cohort
Beginning 13.8%
1 to 5 years 46.5%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.1%
21 to 30 years 4.3%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 449 reporting for every category shown · 449 in full cohort
Beginning 13.8%
1 to 5 years 46.7%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 13.3%
21 to 30 years 3.5%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for IDEA South Flores College Preparatory in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classIDEA South Flores College Preparatory · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
26.3
22.6
Secondary English
18.4
17.5
Secondary languages other than English
18.2
17
Secondary math
18.2
17.5
Secondary science
15
18.5
Secondary social studies
18.1
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
4of 105
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure
10of 105
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108807021.