+12.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 260 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
19 of 260tied with 7 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.0 ptsvs 82 average · 398 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
35 of 398tied with 15 others
Score vs state
+12.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
74 of 829tied with 30 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 260 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82 average for 398 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
56%vs 42.5% avg · +13.5 pts
Masters
21%vs 16.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 260 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 260 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 260 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82 average for 398 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 398 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 15 others).
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+12.4 vs similar economic context · 260 reporting
School Progress95 A+12.8 vs similar economic context · 259 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+13.1 vs similar economic context · 254 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−3.6 vs similar economic context · 243 reporting
Relative Performance95 A+14.2 vs similar economic context · 257 reporting
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (260 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
95
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so
Student Achievement (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level82%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Meets grade level56%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Masters grade level21%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Meets grade level66%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Masters grade level26%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 reporting
Meets grade level44%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 reporting
Masters grade level14%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting
Meets grade level59%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting
Masters grade level22%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Meets grade level53%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (260 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
98.6%+27.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
98.8%+32.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
98.8%+38.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+17.2 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
82.8%
+17.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
95.9%
70.6%
+25.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
95.9%
36.7%
+59.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
67.1%
25.7%
+41.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
14.1%
−14.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
17.8%
12.8%
+5.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.4%
−0.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
1.0%
−1.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
3.9%
−3.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
1.4%
1.4%
+0.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
8.2%
7.2%
+1.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.7%
1.9%
+0.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
82
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
69
84.1% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
10
12.2% of graduates
Not trackable
3
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
82
Selected comparison
69.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
69
Selected comparison
33.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
84.1%
Selected comparison
44.9%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
+39.2 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
12.2%
Selected comparison
49.9%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
−37.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
5.2%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)29
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)9
TEXAS STATE T. C. in HARLINGEN (009225)6
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
800
Economically disadvantaged
75.0%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.4%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.3%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.9%−14.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
African American 0.5%
Hispanic 95.5%
White 3.3%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting for every category shown · 260 in full cohort
African American 18.8%
Hispanic 68.7%
White 7.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 398 reporting for every category shown · 398 in full cohort
African American 14.5%
Hispanic 66.6%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
800
Economically disadvantaged students
600
Emergent bilingual students
203
Special education students
82
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
54
Students in TEA mobility denominator
797
TEA-published mobility rate
6.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 800 students in 2025–26, an increase of 20 (2.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
800
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+20
Increase · +2.6%
Change since 2021–22
+37
Increase · +4.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
800
Selected comparison
496.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
School year
Students enrolledIDEA San Benito College Preparatory
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
763
First available year
487.6
2022–23
767
Increase of 4 (0.5%)
501.8
2023–24
782
Increase of 15 (2.0%)
498.9
2024–25
780
Decrease of 2 (0.3%)
501.2
2025–26
800
Increase of 20 (2.6%)
496.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
43
5.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
58
7.35 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
789
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.5%
Selected comparison
9.9%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 rated charter campuses reporting
−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
7.35
Selected comparison
16.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 185 rated charter campuses reporting
−8.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
794
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
794
21
2.6%
24
3.02
10.1%
16.2
2022–23
779
31
4.0%
36
4.62
10.7%
18
2023–24
801
36
4.5%
42
5.24
10.8%
18.1
2024–25
789
43
5.5%
58
7.35
9.9%
16.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for IDEA San Benito College Preparatory in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
43
5.5%
58
7.35
9.9%
16.1
In-school suspensions
16
2.0%
16
2.03
5.7%
7.8
Out-of-school suspensions
32
4.1%
42
5.32
8.2%
11.5
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,563
Selected comparison
$11,441
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 rated charter campuses reporting
+$1,122 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,563 per student for this campus, $14,202 per student for its parent district, IDEA Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,628
$10,855
$13,054
$8,250
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 179 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$9,106
$11,089
$13,108
$8,667
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 192 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$9,494
$11,676
$14,058
$9,394
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$10,075
$11,823
$14,797
$9,370
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$11,860
$13,328
$15,708
$10,780
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 233 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$12,285
$12,890
$16,792
$11,098
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 239 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,719
$13,294
$18,125
$11,552
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$12,563
$14,202
$18,972
$11,441
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,675+$1,333 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+20.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.2−2.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
IDEA San Benito College Preparatory
Beginning 24.1%
1 to 5 years 30.6%
6 to 10 years 28.2%
11 to 20 years 17%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting for every category shown · 260 in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 47%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 15.2%
21 to 30 years 4.3%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 398 reporting for every category shown · 398 in full cohort
Beginning 13.6%
1 to 5 years 47%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 13.1%
21 to 30 years 3.5%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for IDEA San Benito College Preparatory in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classIDEA San Benito College Preparatory · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
30.7
22.6
Secondary English
22.6
17.5
Secondary languages other than English
18.7
16.9
Secondary math
19.2
17.6
Secondary science
17.7
18.3
Secondary social studies
20.6
18.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
9of 112
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 112 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
13of 255
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 255 that report this measure · tied with 5
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108807005.