+15.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 416 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
3 of 416tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 391 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
12 of 391tied with 6 others
Score vs state
+14.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
23 of 829tied with 17 others
A96
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.7 average for 416 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.1 average for 391 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
94 to 962024-25 to 2025-26
96 is 15.3 points above
the 80.7 average among 416 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 3rd of 416 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 5 charter campuses share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 416 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 416 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 391 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 12th of 391 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 6 others).
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+21.2 vs similar economic context · 416 reporting
School Progress96 A+14.3 vs similar economic context · 416 reporting
Closing the Gaps96 A+18.5 vs similar economic context · 412 reporting
Academic Growth84 B+10.5 vs similar economic context · 397 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+16.0 vs similar economic context · 413 reporting
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (416 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
96
A
—
Academic Growth
84
B
6
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting
Meets grade level64%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting
Masters grade level29%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting
Meets grade level67%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting
Masters grade level32%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
Meets grade level66%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
Masters grade level29%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
Meets grade level59%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
Meets grade level59%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
Masters grade level29%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (416 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+38.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
99.0%+41.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−49.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−0.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%+15.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%
83.9%
+15.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 144 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
80.0%
68.0%
+12.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
80.0%
35.3%
+44.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
81.2%
29.3%
+51.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
10.6%
−10.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
8.2%
13.8%
−5.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.3%
−0.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
30.6%
4.0%
+26.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
2.4%
1.4%
+1.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
8.2%
8.0%
+0.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.2%
1.9%
−0.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
100
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
81
81.0% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
14
14.0% of graduates
Not trackable
5
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
100
Selected comparison
80.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
81
Selected comparison
40.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
81.0%
Selected comparison
46.3%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
+34.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
14.0%
Selected comparison
47.9%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
−33.9 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
5.0%
Selected comparison
5.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)55
TEXAS SOUTHMOST COLLEGE (003643)9
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY (003613)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
814
Economically disadvantaged
89.3%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
51.5%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.5%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.8%−17.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
Hispanic 97.8%
White 2.1%
Asian 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting for every category shown · 416 in full cohort
African American 18.3%
Hispanic 74.9%
White 3.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 391 reporting for every category shown · 391 in full cohort
African American 14.5%
Hispanic 66.6%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
814
Economically disadvantaged students
727
Emergent bilingual students
419
Special education students
69
Early college pathways
Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
59
TEA-published share: 7.2%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
828
TEA-published mobility rate
2.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 814 students in 2025–26, an increase of 1 (0.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
814
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+1
Increase · +0.1%
Change since 2021–22
+10
Increase · +1.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
814
Selected comparison
507.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
School year
Students enrolledIDEA Riverview College Preparatory
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
804
First available year
489.2
2022–23
787
Decrease of 17 (2.1%)
502.4
2023–24
800
Increase of 13 (1.7%)
508.6
2024–25
813
Increase of 13 (1.6%)
511.5
2025–26
814
Increase of 1 (0.1%)
507.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
61
7.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
87
10.55 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
825
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.4%
Selected comparison
10.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated charter campuses reporting
−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
10.55
Selected comparison
17.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 276 rated charter campuses reporting
−7.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
749
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
834
82
9.8%
103
12.35
11.0%
18.1
2022–23
804
102
12.7%
149
18.53
11.5%
19.7
2023–24
812
54
6.7%
67
8.25
11.5%
19
2024–25
825
61
7.4%
87
10.55
10.8%
17.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for IDEA Riverview College Preparatory in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
61
7.4%
87
10.55
10.8%
17.7
In-school suspensions
43
5.2%
54
6.55
7.1%
10.2
Out-of-school suspensions
31
3.8%
33
4.00
8.6%
12.1
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,239
Selected comparison
$11,882
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated charter campuses reporting
+$357 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,239 per student for this campus, $14,202 per student for its parent district, IDEA Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,176
$10,855
$13,054
$8,573
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$9,584
$11,089
$13,108
$8,715
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 310 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$9,160
$11,676
$14,058
$9,197
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 327 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$9,323
$11,823
$14,797
$9,547
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 354 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$11,417
$13,328
$15,708
$11,401
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$12,432
$12,890
$16,792
$11,453
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,774
$13,294
$18,125
$11,559
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 397 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$12,239
$14,202
$18,972
$11,882
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,256−$2,554 vs similar economic context
Teachers
54+24.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.2−2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
IDEA Riverview College Preparatory
Beginning 17.4%
1 to 5 years 66.9%
6 to 10 years 10.7%
11 to 20 years 4.3%
21 to 30 years 0.2%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 reporting for every category shown · 416 in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 47.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 14.8%
21 to 30 years 4.1%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 391 reporting for every category shown · 391 in full cohort
Beginning 13.7%
1 to 5 years 47.2%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 13.2%
21 to 30 years 3.4%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for IDEA Riverview College Preparatory in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classIDEA Riverview College Preparatory · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
29.4
23.6
Secondary English
23.3
19
Secondary languages other than English
21.6
18.1
Secondary math
22.9
19.5
Secondary science
20.5
20.2
Secondary social studies
21.7
20.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 416
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 4
1of 413
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 413 that report this measure · tied with 6
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
3of 416
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 4
3of 412
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 412 that report this measure · tied with 3
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 416
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 6
6of 416
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 415
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 415 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 145
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 145 that report this measure
8of 145
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 145 that report this measure
10of 392
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 392 that report this measure · tied with 4
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
11of 416
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 4
12of 415
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 415 that report this measure
14of 416
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 5
17of 416
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 2
21of 416
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 416 that report this measure · tied with 6
22of 415
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 415 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108807014.