Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

IDEA Lopez College Preparatory

IDEA Public Schools · Odessa · 122 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
80/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 201 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
112 of 201tied with 11 others
B80

At a glance

The current score is below the 81.3 average for 201 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
57%vs 49.1% avg · +7.9 pts
Masters
23%vs 19.2% avg · +3.8 pts

Among 201 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

78 +5.1 pts vs 72.9

  • 78 is 5.1 points above the 72.9 average among 186 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

83 +2.5 pts vs 80.5

  • 83 is 2.5 points above the 80.5 average among 198 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

IDEA Lopez College Preparatory is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 201 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 112th of 201 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 80 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8081.3 201 reporting81.7 829 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement76 C−3.1 vs similar economic context · 201 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 200 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−3.6 vs similar economic context · 193 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C+5.1 vs similar economic context · 186 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 198 reporting
  • IDEA Lopez College Preparatory
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (201 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement76C4
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 199 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 199 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 199 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (201 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
122
Economically disadvantaged
69.7%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
37.7%+11.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.4%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

IDEA Lopez College Preparatory

African American: 2.5%Hispanic: 83.6%White: 12.3%Asian: 0.8%Two or More Races: 0.8%
  • African American 2.5%
  • Hispanic 83.6%
  • White 12.3%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 0.8%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting for every category shown · 201 in full cohort

African American: 19.5%Hispanic: 62.3%White: 11.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 19.5%
  • Hispanic 62.3%
  • White 11.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
122
Economically disadvantaged students
85
Emergent bilingual students
46
Special education students
20

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$69,527+$7,294 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−23.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19.7+1.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

IDEA Lopez College Preparatory

Beginning: 30.6%1 to 5 years: 69.4%6 to 10 years: 1.6%
  • Beginning 30.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 69.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 1.6%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 reporting for every category shown · 201 in full cohort

Beginning: 14.7%1 to 5 years: 45.4%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 15.4%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 14.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108807210.