Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy

IDEA Public Schools · San Antonio · 563 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
76/1002025-26
Change
−15 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
−5.2 ptsvs 81.2 average · 141 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
102 of 141tied with 2 others
C76

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 81.2 average for 141 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
47%vs 45.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
22%vs 19.6% avg · +2.4 pts

Among 141 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
41%vs 37.3% avg · +3.7 pts
Masters
18%vs 15.2% avg · +2.8 pts

Among 139 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
58%vs 52% avg · +6 pts
Masters
30%vs 22.1% avg · +7.9 pts

Among 141 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.2 average for 141 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 15 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 102nd of 141 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
21.3%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 rated charter campuses reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 rated charter campuses reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageIDEA Hidden Meadow Academy 91798176 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26C7681.2 141 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8183.0 134 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24C7981.4 126 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9182.7 121 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—84.4 113 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−5.3 vs similar economic context · 141 reporting
  • School Progress77 C−3.9 vs similar economic context · 141 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−6.1 vs similar economic context · 136 reporting
  • Academic Growth76 C+2.8 vs similar economic context · 132 reporting
  • Relative Performance77 C−2.7 vs similar economic context · 139 reporting
  • IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (141 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress77C3
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth76C4
Relative Performance77C3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (77), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 139 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 139 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 139 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 135 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 135 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 135 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (141 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
563
Economically disadvantaged
60.4%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.7%−8.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.5%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.4%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy

African American: 10.1%Hispanic: 72.6%White: 11%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 2.1%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 10.1%
  • Hispanic 72.6%
  • White 11%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 2.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting for every category shown · 141 in full cohort

African American: 22.3%Hispanic: 50.8%White: 16.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 6.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 22.3%
  • Hispanic 50.8%
  • White 16.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 6.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
563
Economically disadvantaged students
340
Emergent bilingual students
77
Special education students
65

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
97
Students in TEA mobility denominator
579
TEA-published mobility rate
16.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 563 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 45 (7.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
563

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−45

Decrease · −7.4%

Change since 2021–22
+56

Increase · +11.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
563
Selected comparison
488.8

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy
School yearStudents enrolledIDEA Hidden Meadow AcademyChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 507 First available year 448.5
2022–23 457 Decrease of 50 (9.9%) 462.4
2023–24 540 Increase of 83 (18.2%) 481.7
2024–25 608 Increase of 68 (12.6%) 485.6
2025–26 563 Decrease of 45 (7.4%) 488.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16

2.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
28

4.27 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
656

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.4%
Selected comparison
10.1%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 98 rated charter campuses reporting

−7.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.27
Selected comparison
16.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting

−12.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 473 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 539 13 2.4% 13 2.41 9.5% 15.6
2022–23 482 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 607 11 1.8% 15 2.47 10.2% 18.3
2024–25 656 16 2.4% 28 4.27 10.1% 16.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 16 2.4% 28 4.27 10.1% 16.6
In-school suspensions 13 2.0% 20 3.05 6.3% 9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$14k$20k202120232025
  • IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy
  • Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,431
Selected comparison
$11,619

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 133 rated charter campuses reporting

−$1,188 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,431 per student for this campus, $14,202 per student for its parent district, IDEA Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearIDEA Hidden Meadow AcademyParent district: IDEA Public SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2021$11,642$11,823$14,797$9,435 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$11,435$13,328$15,708$10,951 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 115 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$12,166$12,890$16,792$11,239 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$11,089$13,294$18,125$11,387 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$10,431$14,202$18,972$11,619 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 133 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,897+$4,517 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30+0.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19+1.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy

Beginning: 3.4%1 to 5 years: 67.6%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 6.1%21 to 30 years: 3%
  • Beginning 3.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 67.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 6.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 3%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 reporting for every category shown · 141 in full cohort

Beginning: 15.5%1 to 5 years: 41.6%6 to 10 years: 20.5%11 to 20 years: 16.4%21 to 30 years: 5.1%Over 30 years: 1%
  • Beginning 15.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 41.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.1%
  • Over 30 years 1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for IDEA Hidden Meadow Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classIDEA Hidden Meadow Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten24.920.5
Grade 12721.6
Grade 226.523.2
Grade 330.122.7
Grade 427.522.8
Grade 525.322.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108807198.