−10.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 322 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
268 of 322tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
−9.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
348 of 427tied with 6 others
Score vs state
−10.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
685 of 829tied with 9 others
C71
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.5 average for 322 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.3 average for 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 40.4% avg · +22.6 pts
Masters
23%vs 15.6% avg · +7.4 pts
Among 313 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 322 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 23 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 268th of 322 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.3 average for 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 23 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 348th of 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 6 others).
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 23 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 rated charter campuses reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 rated charter campuses reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement71 C−5.8 vs similar economic context · 322 reporting
School Progress76 C−6.5 vs similar economic context · 321 reporting
Closing the Gaps59 F−19.2 vs similar economic context · 317 reporting
Academic Growth58 F−15.8 vs similar economic context · 305 reporting
Relative Performance76 C−4.7 vs similar economic context · 319 reporting
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (322 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
71
C
9
School Progress
76
C
4
Closing the Gaps
59
F
1
Academic Growth
58
F
2
Relative Performance
76
C
4
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (76), so
Student Achievement (71) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 76.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level69%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Meets grade level42%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Masters grade level16%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level63%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Meets grade level45%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Masters grade level18%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level66%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Meets grade level25%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Masters grade level8%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
Meets grade level63%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
Masters grade level23%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 220 reporting
Meets grade level49%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 220 reporting
Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 220 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (322 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
0.0%−70.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 106 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−64.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−59.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
2.3%+1.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 106 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
490
Economically disadvantaged
78.8%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
43.5%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.3%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.5%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
27.1%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
African American 15.3%
Hispanic 75.9%
White 6.5%
Asian 1.4%
Two or More Races 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting for every category shown · 322 in full cohort
African American 18.4%
Hispanic 71.8%
White 5.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 427 reporting for every category shown · 427 in full cohort
African American 16.6%
Hispanic 65.6%
White 9.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
490
Economically disadvantaged students
386
Emergent bilingual students
213
Special education students
85
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
118
Students in TEA mobility denominator
533
TEA-published mobility rate
22.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 490 students in 2025–26, an increase of 24 (5.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
490
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+24
Increase · +5.2%
Change since 2021–22
+197
Increase · +67.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
490
Selected comparison
508.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
School year
Students enrolledIDEA Achieve College Preparatory
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
293
First available year
489.7
2022–23
399
Increase of 106 (36.2%)
506.7
2023–24
465
Increase of 66 (16.5%)
505.9
2024–25
466
Increase of 1 (0.2%)
511.2
2025–26
490
Increase of 24 (5.2%)
508.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
93
17.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
160
30.08 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
532
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
17.5%
Selected comparison
10.3%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated charter campuses reporting
+7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
30.08
Selected comparison
16.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 230 rated charter campuses reporting
+13.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
189
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
320
57
17.8%
97
30.31
10.5%
17.4
2022–23
464
79
17.0%
119
25.65
11.3%
19.5
2023–24
521
97
18.6%
190
36.47
11.0%
18.8
2024–25
532
93
17.5%
160
30.08
10.3%
16.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for IDEA Achieve College Preparatory in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
93
17.5%
160
30.08
10.3%
16.7
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
93
17.5%
156
29.32
8.5%
11.9
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$16,156
Selected comparison
$11,687
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated charter campuses reporting
+$4,469 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $16,156 per student for this campus, $14,202 per student for its parent district, IDEA Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
Parent district: IDEA Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2020
$25,835
$11,676
$14,058
$9,582
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$14,851
$11,823
$14,797
$9,568
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$14,437
$13,328
$15,708
$11,103
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 294 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$13,817
$12,890
$16,792
$11,373
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$14,608
$13,294
$18,125
$11,866
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$16,156
$14,202
$18,972
$11,687
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,081+$4,074 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38+7.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.1−4.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
IDEA Achieve College Preparatory
Beginning 23.5%
1 to 5 years 73.9%
6 to 10 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting for every category shown · 322 in full cohort
Beginning 12.8%
1 to 5 years 46.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 14.9%
21 to 30 years 4.5%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 427 reporting for every category shown · 427 in full cohort
Beginning 13.4%
1 to 5 years 46.8%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 13.6%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for IDEA Achieve College Preparatory in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classIDEA Achieve College Preparatory · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
1
21.2
Grade 6
18.5
22.9
Secondary English
15.2
17.8
Secondary languages other than English
18.4
17.3
Secondary math
15.8
17.9
Secondary science
12.1
18.8
Secondary social studies
14.9
19.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
15of 416
Per-student spending
Similar size · of the 416 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108807087.