+10.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 1,880 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
152 of 1,880tied with 50 others
Score vs region
+13.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
40 of 650tied with 17 others
Score vs county
+8.0 ptsvs 84 average · 16 rated schools in Kerr County
Kerr County placement
2 of 16among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+10.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 1,426 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
173 of 1,426tied with 51 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 1,880 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 84 average for 16 rated schools in Kerr County.The current score is above the 81.1 average for 1,426 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
78%vs 50.8% avg · +27.2 pts
Masters
39%vs 21.3% avg · +17.7 pts
Among 1,808 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hunt School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 1,880 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 152nd of 1,880 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).
Hunt School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 40th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 17 others).
Hunt School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 16 rated schools in Kerr County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 16 rated schools in Kerr County.
Hunt School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 1,426 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 173rd of 1,426 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 51 others).
Hunt School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+12.8 vs similar economic context · 1,808 reporting
School Progress93 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,800 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+12.7 vs similar economic context · 1,784 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,751 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.6 vs similar economic context · 1,800 reporting
Hunt School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,880 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level97%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 reporting
Meets grade level78%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 reporting
Masters grade level39%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,805 reporting
Meets grade level80%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,805 reporting
Masters grade level48%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,805 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 reporting
Meets grade level79%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 reporting
Masters grade level28%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting
Meets grade level86%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting
Masters grade level52%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Meets grade level43%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Masters grade level24%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,880 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
212
Economically disadvantaged
56.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.2%−9.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.3%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.4%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.6%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Hunt School
African American 0.9%
Hispanic 29.4%
White 66.4%
American Indian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.5%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting for every category shown · 1,880 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 45.4%
White 37.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Kerr County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
African American 1.3%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 48.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,426 reporting for every category shown · 1,426 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 48.2%
White 38.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
211
Economically disadvantaged students
119
Emergent bilingual students
11
Special education students
28
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
14
Students in TEA mobility denominator
166
TEA-published mobility rate
8.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 212 students in 2025–26, an increase of 16 (8.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
212
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+16
Increase · +8.2%
Change since 2021–22
+3
Increase · +1.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
212
Selected comparison
631.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Hunt School
School year
Students enrolledHunt School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
209
First available year
635
2022–23
202
Decrease of 7 (3.3%)
641.5
2023–24
200
Decrease of 2 (1.0%)
640.1
2024–25
196
Decrease of 4 (2.0%)
637
2025–26
212
Increase of 16 (8.2%)
631.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
207
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hunt School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
209
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
214
Suppressed
—
11
5.14
—
27.9
2022–23
204
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
206
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
207
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hunt School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Hunt School
Parent district: Hunt ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$17,825
Selected comparison
$12,334
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
+$5,491 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $17,825 per student for this campus, $24,737 per student for its parent district, Hunt ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Hunt School
Parent district: Hunt ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,258
$13,288
$13,054
$7,937
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,035
$12,789
$13,108
$8,107
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 rated schools reporting
2020
$12,448
$15,844
$14,058
$8,694
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 rated schools reporting
2021
$13,773
$17,757
$14,797
$9,072
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,754 rated schools reporting
2022
$13,443
$16,847
$15,708
$10,480
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,771 rated schools reporting
2023
$15,718
$19,702
$16,792
$10,987
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2024
$16,326
$25,599
$18,125
$11,814
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting
2025
$17,825
$24,737
$18,972
$12,334
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$74,317+$7,799 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−21.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.4−8.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hunt School
1 to 5 years 14.3%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 42.4%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting for every category shown · 1,880 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Kerr County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 19.6%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 19.9%
Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,426 reporting for every category shown · 1,426 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 17.6%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hunt School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHunt School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22
18
Grade 1
23
18.2
Grade 2
22
18.4
Grade 3
21
18.8
Grade 4
19
19
Grade 5
13.1
19.7
Grade 6
20.6
17.5
Secondary English
8.6
14.8
Secondary languages other than English
19.5
17.3
Secondary math
6.4
15.7
Secondary science
13.5
17.2
Secondary social studies
19.5
17.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
10 measures
1of 590
Science — Approaches
Region 20: San Antonio · of the 590 that report this measure · tied with 10
1of 15
Student Achievement
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
1of 15
All Subjects — Masters
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
1of 14
Reading — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
1of 14
Reading — Meets
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
1of 14
Reading — Masters
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
1of 14
Math — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
1of 14
Math — Meets
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
1of 13
Science — Meets
Kerr County · of the 13 that report this measure
1of 13
Science — Masters
Kerr County · of the 13 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
11 measures
2of 16
Overall score
Kerr County · of the 16 that report this measure
2of 16
Per-student spending
Kerr County · of the 16 that report this measure
2of 15
All Subjects — Approaches
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
2of 15
All Subjects — Meets
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
2of 14
School Progress
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
2of 14
Academic Growth
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 14
Relative Performance
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
3of 15
Attendance
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
3of 15
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
3of 14
Closing the Gaps
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
3of 14
Math — Masters
Kerr County · of the 14 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 133902101.