Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hoffman MS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 518 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
72/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−5.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,352 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,679 of 2,352tied with 43 others
C72

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 72 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,352 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 12 points

66 to 78 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 78 is 3 points above the 75 average among 2,154 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hoffman MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,352 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,679th of 2,352 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 43 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026-27 school year

Public Education Grant transfer eligibility

Students assigned to this campus may request a transfer under the state's PEG program.

A request is not guaranteed. A receiving district may apply its enrollment rules, and transportation is not automatically provided.

Read the official PEG rules and list

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
34.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,352 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
8.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,352 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHoffman MS 6947595972 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7277.6 2,352 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25F5977.2 2,333 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5974.0 2,314 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F4773.6 2,304 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6981.8 2,277 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement56 F−14.6 vs similar economic context · 2,175 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−8.8 vs similar economic context · 2,170 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps78 C+3.0 vs similar economic context · 2,154 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−3.0 vs similar economic context · 2,134 reporting
  • Relative Performance60 D−16.9 vs similar economic context · 2,169 reporting
  • Hoffman MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,352 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement56F4
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps78C2
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance60D10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (70), so Student Achievement (56) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 70.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level50%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,175 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,175 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,175 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,174 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,174 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,174 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level43%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,166 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,166 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,166 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level46%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level36%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Meets grade level14%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,352 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
518
Economically disadvantaged
90.2%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
53.7%+14.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.1%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
32.3%+9.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hoffman MS

African American: 27.4%Hispanic: 69.3%White: 1.9%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 27.4%
  • Hispanic 69.3%
  • White 1.9%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,352 reporting for every category shown · 2,352 in full cohort

African American: 14.7%Hispanic: 75.6%White: 6.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.7%
  • African American 14.7%
  • Hispanic 75.6%
  • White 6.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
518
Economically disadvantaged students
467
Emergent bilingual students
278
Special education students
88

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
206
Students in TEA mobility denominator
759
TEA-published mobility rate
27.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 518 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 125 (19.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
518

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−125

Decrease · −19.4%

Change since 2021–22
−539

Decrease · −51.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
518
Selected comparison
577.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,329 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hoffman MS
School yearStudents enrolledHoffman MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,057 First available year 622.7
2022–23 637 Decrease of 420 (39.7%) 619.1
2023–24 642 Increase of 5 (0.8%) 609.3
2024–25 643 Increase of 1 (0.2%) 602.9
2025–26 518 Decrease of 125 (19.4%) 577.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
308

41.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
950

128.55 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
739

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
41.7%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,458 rated schools reporting

+28.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
128.55
Selected comparison
31.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,569 rated schools reporting

+97.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hoffman MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,195 98 8.2% 149 12.47 7.3% 14.3
2021–22 1,168 389 33.3% 911 78.00 12.8% 30.8
2022–23 757 231 30.5% 560 73.98 13.7% 33.5
2023–24 753 253 33.6% 615 81.67 13.8% 33.7
2024–25 739 308 41.7% 950 128.55 13.2% 31.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hoffman MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 308 41.7% 950 128.55 13.2% 31.6
In-school suspensions 264 35.7% 597 80.78 11.5% 22.5
Out-of-school suspensions 176 23.8% 295 39.92 9.2% 15
DAEP placements 35 4.7% 43 5.82 5.2% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements 27 3.6% 31 4.19 3.9% 4.5
Discretionary DAEP placements 12 1.6% 12 1.62 3.4% 4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Hoffman MS
  • Parent district: Aldine ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,480
Selected comparison
$13,157

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,331 rated schools reporting

+$1,323 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,480 per student for this campus, $17,481 per student for its parent district, Aldine ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHoffman MSParent district: Aldine ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,405$16,847$13,054$8,296 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 rated schools reporting
2019$12,019$11,964$13,108$8,314 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,248 rated schools reporting
2020$9,592$11,579$14,058$8,823 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,255 rated schools reporting
2021$9,594$13,398$14,797$9,631 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,259 rated schools reporting
2022$10,078$13,566$15,708$11,146 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,277 rated schools reporting
2023$12,072$15,592$16,792$11,687 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,303 rated schools reporting
2024$12,675$17,695$18,125$12,564 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,317 rated schools reporting
2025$14,480$17,481$18,972$13,157 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,331 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,056+$935 vs similar economic context
Teachers
55+14.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.5−5.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hoffman MS

Beginning: 16.6%1 to 5 years: 31.4%6 to 10 years: 27.6%11 to 20 years: 15.1%21 to 30 years: 9.3%
  • Beginning 16.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,352 reporting for every category shown · 2,352 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hoffman MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHoffman MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 616.417.4
Secondary English9.715.2
Secondary languages other than English9.318.2
Secondary math18.416.7
Secondary science17.717.7
Secondary social studies17.617.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101902046.