+10.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
195 of 1,969tied with 89 others
Score vs region
+15.6 ptsvs 75.4 average · 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont
Region 05: Beaumont placement
11 of 150tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+19.0 ptsvs 72 average · 53 rated schools in Jefferson County
Jefferson County placement
5 of 53among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+10.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 3,938 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
519 of 3,938tied with 236 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.4 average for 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont.The current score is above the 72 average for 53 rated schools in Jefferson County.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 3,938 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
67%vs 49% avg · +18 pts
Masters
40%vs 20.1% avg · +19.9 pts
Among 1,879 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hillcrest Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 195th of 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 89 others).
Hillcrest Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 11th of 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont (tied with 3 others).
Hillcrest Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 72 average for 53 rated schools in Jefferson County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 53 rated schools in Jefferson County.
Hillcrest Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 3,938 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 519th of 3,938 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 236 others).
Hillcrest Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+12.4 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
School Progress91 A+9.8 vs similar economic context · 1,872 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+14.3 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,816 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.5 vs similar economic context · 1,872 reporting
Hillcrest Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,969 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Meets grade level67%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Masters grade level40%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Meets grade level69%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Masters grade level43%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Meets grade level68%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Masters grade level38%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 reporting
Meets grade level60%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 reporting
Masters grade level39%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,969 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
766
Economically disadvantaged
61.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
46.0%+29.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.7%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.5%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Hillcrest Elem
African American 9.6%
Hispanic 56%
White 17.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 12.2%
Pacific Islander 0.8%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 reporting for every category shown · 1,969 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
African American 20.1%
Hispanic 22.9%
White 50.9%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Jefferson County · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
African American 37.3%
Hispanic 35.5%
White 20.7%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,938 reporting for every category shown · 3,938 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.7%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
761
Economically disadvantaged students
470
Emergent bilingual students
350
Special education students
112
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
86
Students in TEA mobility denominator
617
TEA-published mobility rate
13.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 766 students in 2025–26, an increase of 49 (6.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
766
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+49
Increase · +6.8%
Change since 2021–22
+184
Increase · +31.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
766
Selected comparison
627.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Hillcrest Elem
School year
Students enrolledHillcrest Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
582
First available year
640
2022–23
576
Decrease of 6 (1.0%)
644.3
2023–24
701
Increase of 125 (21.7%)
641.5
2024–25
717
Increase of 16 (2.3%)
638.1
2025–26
766
Increase of 49 (6.8%)
627.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
1.41 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
779
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
1.41
Selected comparison
29.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 rated schools reporting
−28.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hillcrest Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
581
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
643
Suppressed
—
10
1.56
—
29.2
2022–23
620
10
1.6%
11
1.77
13.2%
31.2
2023–24
756
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
779
Suppressed
—
11
1.41
—
29.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hillcrest Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
1.41
—
29.4
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
1.28
—
22.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Hillcrest Elem
Parent district: Nederland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,596
Selected comparison
$12,502
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting
−$4,906 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,596 per student for this campus, $14,709 per student for its parent district, Nederland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Hillcrest Elem
Parent district: Nederland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,165
$9,892
$13,054
$7,923
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,797 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,142
$10,236
$13,108
$8,070
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,813 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,784
$13,761
$14,058
$8,678
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,894
$15,909
$14,797
$9,106
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,770
$21,094
$15,708
$10,467
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,028
$27,159
$16,792
$11,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,007
$19,212
$18,125
$11,961
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,596
$14,709
$18,972
$12,502
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,856−$1,491 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+4.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.4−2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hillcrest Elem
Beginning 2.2%
1 to 5 years 15.1%
6 to 10 years 34.6%
11 to 20 years 30.9%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 reporting for every category shown · 1,969 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
Beginning 8.3%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 25.1%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Jefferson County · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
Beginning 13.7%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 24.5%
21 to 30 years 12.9%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,938 reporting for every category shown · 3,938 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hillcrest Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHillcrest Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20
18
Grade 1
21.9
18.2
Grade 2
20.1
18.4
Grade 3
20.7
18.6
Grade 4
22.3
18.9
Grade 5
18.2
19.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
2of 47
All Subjects — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
2of 47
Math — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
3of 47
Relative Performance
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 47
Reading — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
3of 47
Math — Meets
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
14 measures
4of 47
School Progress
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
4of 47
Closing the Gaps
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 53
Overall score
Jefferson County · of the 53 that report this measure
5of 47
Student Achievement
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 47
Academic Growth
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 47
All Subjects — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 47
All Subjects — Meets
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
5of 47
Reading — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 47
Reading — Meets
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
5of 47
Science — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
7of 51
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Jefferson County · of the 51 that report this measure
7of 47
Math — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
9of 51
Attendance
Jefferson County · of the 51 that report this measure
10of 47
Science — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 123905103.