Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Hill Country MSA95vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Hill Country MS
Travis County · Region 13: Austin · 944 students
Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.9 ptsvs 92.1 average · 289 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
29 of 289tied with 39 others
Score vs region
+15.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
14 of 519tied with 14 others
Score vs county
+17.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 195 rated schools in Travis County
Travis County placement
4 of 195tied with 6 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 2,908 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
51 of 2,908tied with 50 others
Score vs state
+13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
247 of 7,646tied with 131 others
A95
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 92.1 average for 289 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 77.9 average for 195 rated schools in Travis County.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 2,908 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
86%vs 77.6% avg · +8.4 pts
Masters
62%vs 48.9% avg · +13.1 pts
Among 284 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hill Country MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 92.1 average for 289 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 289 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 39 others).
Hill Country MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 14 others).
Hill Country MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 195 rated schools in Travis County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 195 rated schools in Travis County (tied with 6 others).
Hill Country MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 2,908 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 51st of 2,908 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 50 others).
Hill Country MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+2.0 vs similar economic context · 284 reporting
School Progress93 A+4.6 vs similar economic context · 282 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+3.9 vs similar economic context · 280 reporting
Academic Growth93 A+5.8 vs similar economic context · 280 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 282 reporting
Hill Country MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (289 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
93
A
—
Relative Performance
85
B
5
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so
School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level95%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 reporting
Meets grade level86%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 reporting
Masters grade level62%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 reporting
Meets grade level90%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 reporting
Masters grade level70%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 reporting
Meets grade level85%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 reporting
Masters grade level55%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting
Meets grade level91%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting
Masters grade level73%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 89 reporting
Meets grade level72%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 89 reporting
Masters grade level52%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 89 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (289 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
944
Economically disadvantaged
1.8%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.9%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.7%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.7%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Hill Country MS
African American 0.8%
Hispanic 15.4%
White 63.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 11.9%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 7.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 289 reporting for every category shown · 289 in full cohort
African American 4.2%
Hispanic 15.2%
White 48.7%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 25.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,908 reporting for every category shown · 2,908 in full cohort
African American 12.8%
Hispanic 52.4%
White 24.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
944
Economically disadvantaged students
17
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
129
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
30
Students in TEA mobility denominator
962
TEA-published mobility rate
3.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 944 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 2 (0.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
944
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−2
Decrease · −0.2%
Change since 2021–22
−66
Decrease · −6.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
944
Selected comparison
826.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Hill Country MS
School year
Students enrolledHill Country MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,010
First available year
835.8
2022–23
975
Decrease of 35 (3.5%)
853
2023–24
968
Decrease of 7 (0.7%)
835.8
2024–25
946
Decrease of 22 (2.3%)
834.8
2025–26
944
Decrease of 2 (0.2%)
826.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
49
5.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
108
11.23 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
962
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.1%
Selected comparison
4.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 rated schools reporting
+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
11.23
Selected comparison
6.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 178 rated schools reporting
+4.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hill Country MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,069
37
3.5%
58
5.43
3.1%
4.8
2021–22
1,026
72
7.0%
111
10.82
4.4%
7.1
2022–23
1,010
62
6.1%
98
9.70
4.3%
6.6
2023–24
997
57
5.7%
80
8.02
4.3%
6.8
2024–25
962
49
5.1%
108
11.23
4.4%
6.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hill Country MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
49
5.1%
108
11.23
4.4%
6.9
In-school suspensions
40
4.2%
66
6.86
4.2%
5.7
Out-of-school suspensions
22
2.3%
26
2.70
1.7%
2.2
DAEP placements
15
1.6%
16
1.66
1.3%
1.4
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Hill Country MS
Parent district: Eanes ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,807
Selected comparison
$10,773
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 280 rated schools reporting
+$34 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,807 per student for this campus, $21,384 per student for its parent district, Eanes ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Hill Country MS
Parent district: Eanes ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,260
$14,877
$13,054
$7,124
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,027
$13,673
$13,108
$7,311
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 240 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,436
$14,632
$14,058
$7,614
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,069
$16,630
$14,797
$8,050
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,366
$16,404
$15,708
$9,289
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,749
$17,030
$16,792
$9,208
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,155
$19,737
$18,125
$10,133
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,807
$21,384
$18,972
$10,773
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 280 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,718−$3,914 vs similar economic context
Teachers
67+12.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.1−0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hill Country MS
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 29.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 289 reporting for every category shown · 289 in full cohort
Beginning 4%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.2%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 30.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 26.7%
21 to 30 years 13.2%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,908 reporting for every category shown · 2,908 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.6%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hill Country MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHill Country MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
19.3
18.3
Secondary English
20.3
18.7
Secondary languages other than English
21.3
22
Secondary math
20.8
18.5
Secondary science
21.1
21.3
Secondary social studies
24.1
21.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 192
All Subjects — Masters
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure
3of 192
Reading — Meets
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure
3of 192
Reading — Masters
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
4of 192
All Subjects — Meets
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 192
Math — Meets
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure
4of 192
Math — Masters
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure
4of 191
Science — Meets
Travis County · of the 191 that report this measure
4of 191
Science — Masters
Travis County · of the 191 that report this measure
5of 192
Reading — Approaches
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 192
All Subjects — Approaches
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure · tied with 3
6of 192
Math — Approaches
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure
8of 192
Closing the Gaps
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure · tied with 3
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
11of 191
Science — Approaches
Travis County · of the 191 that report this measure · tied with 1
16of 506
Student Achievement
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure · tied with 9
16of 491
Academic Growth
Region 13: Austin · of the 491 that report this measure · tied with 9
24of 504
School Progress
Region 13: Austin · of the 504 that report this measure · tied with 9
38of 1,180
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 1,180 that report this measure · tied with 8
51of 2,908
Overall score
Similar size · of the 2,908 that report this measure · tied with 50
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227909041.