Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Highland School

Nolan County · Region 14: Abilene · 211 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
97/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.8 ptsvs 89.2 average · 827 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
20 of 827tied with 8 others
A97

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89.2 average for 827 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 4 points

91 to 95 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 95 is 9.5 points above the 85.5 average among 812 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
81%vs 66.2% avg · +14.8 pts
Masters
43%vs 39.1% avg · +3.9 pts

Among 748 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

97 +7.8 pts vs 89.2

  • 97 is 7.8 points above the 89.2 average among 827 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Highland School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89.2 average for 827 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 20th of 827 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 8 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHighland School 9697979797 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9789.2 827 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9789.1 821 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9788.0 806 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9788.4 790 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9689.3 776 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement97 A+6.9 vs similar economic context · 814 reporting
  • School Progress95 A+9.5 vs similar economic context · 812 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps98 A+11.3 vs similar economic context · 808 reporting
  • Academic Growth74 C−8.6 vs similar economic context · 801 reporting
  • Relative Performance95 A+15.4 vs similar economic context · 812 reporting
  • Highland School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (827 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement97A—
School Progress95A—
Closing the Gaps98A—
Academic Growth74C6
Relative Performance95A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (97), so School Progress (95) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level95%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
  • Meets grade level81%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (827 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+10.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 205 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+10.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 205 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%89.4%+10.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course44.4%67.4%−23.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA44.4%50.0%−5.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%27.1%−27.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course61.1%38.4%+22.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification72.2%31.5%+40.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree5.6%3.7%+1.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%7.8%−7.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.3%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student11.1%6.0%+5.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%2.7%−2.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
211
Economically disadvantaged
22.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−10.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.9%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.8%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Highland School

African American: 0.5%Hispanic: 11.8%White: 86.7%Two or More Races: 0.9%
  • African American 0.5%
  • Hispanic 11.8%
  • White 86.7%
  • Two or More Races 0.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 827 reporting for every category shown · 827 in full cohort

African American: 8.1%Hispanic: 25.8%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 11.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.3%
  • African American 8.1%
  • Hispanic 25.8%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 11.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
211
Economically disadvantaged students
47
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
23

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
9
Students in TEA mobility denominator
192
TEA-published mobility rate
4.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 211 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (1.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
211

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+4

Increase · +1.9%

Change since 2021–22
−15

Decrease · −6.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
211
Selected comparison
866.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 822 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Highland School
School yearStudents enrolledHighland SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 226 First available year 883.4
2022–23 226 No change 888.6
2023–24 222 Decrease of 4 (1.8%) 882.9
2024–25 207 Decrease of 15 (6.8%) 875.9
2025–26 211 Increase of 4 (1.9%) 866.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
221

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Highland School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 235 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 227 Suppressed — 11 4.85 — 15.2
2022–23 231 13 5.6% 19 8.23 8.0% 15.6
2023–24 228 Suppressed — 12 5.26 — 15.1
2024–25 221 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Highland School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$19k$31k20182020202220242025
  • Highland School
  • Parent district: Highland ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$16,959
Selected comparison
$11,160

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 820 rated schools reporting

+$5,799 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $16,959 per student for this campus, $28,665 per student for its parent district, Highland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHighland SchoolParent district: Highland ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,291$20,823$13,054$7,479 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 728 rated schools reporting
2019$10,309$19,336$13,108$7,536 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 743 rated schools reporting
2020$11,086$18,855$14,058$7,856 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 753 rated schools reporting
2021$12,473$24,064$14,797$8,399 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 758 rated schools reporting
2022$13,049$22,509$15,708$9,449 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 775 rated schools reporting
2023$14,348$23,615$16,792$10,008 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 791 rated schools reporting
2024$19,929$28,980$18,125$11,062 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 rated schools reporting
2025$16,959$28,665$18,972$11,160 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 820 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,208−$4,548 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−33.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.5−5.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Highland School

Beginning: 4.5%1 to 5 years: 17.6%6 to 10 years: 26.1%11 to 20 years: 21.6%21 to 30 years: 25.7%Over 30 years: 4.5%
  • Beginning 4.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 17.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 26.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 25.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 827 reporting for every category shown · 827 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.7%1 to 5 years: 22.6%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3%
  • Beginning 4.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Highland School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHighland School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1718.8
Grade 116.519.1
Grade 21719.7
Grade 32020.9
Grade 418.520.2
Grade 516.821.8
Grade 611.219.3
Secondary English1317.7
Secondary languages other than English419.8
Secondary math14.318.3
Secondary science14.620.1
Secondary social studies13.520.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 162 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 122

    Overall score

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 122 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 114

    Student Achievement

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 2

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 113

    Math — Meets

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 113 that report this measure

  • 2of 111

    Closing the Gaps

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 111 that report this measure

  • 2of 12

    Per-student spending

    Nolan County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 112

    School Progress

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 112 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 112

    Relative Performance

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 112 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 4of 114

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 117

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 117 that report this measure

  • 5of 114

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure

  • 5of 114

    All Subjects — Meets

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 114

    Reading — Approaches

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 117

    Attendance

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 117 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 113

    Math — Approaches

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 113 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 107

    Science — Meets

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 107 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 73

    Social Studies — Masters

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 73 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 114

    Reading — Masters

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure

  • 9of 113

    Math — Masters

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 113 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 107

    Science — Masters

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 107 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 47

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 10of 107

    Science — Approaches

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 107 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 47

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 177905001.