Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Heritage JH

Brazoria County · Region 04: Houston · 767 students

Current score
80/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+0.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
998 of 2,002tied with 88 others
B80

At a glance

The current score is level with the 79.7 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
46%vs 41.8% avg · +4.2 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.9% avg · +1.1 pts

Among 1,882 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

83 +2.4 pts vs 80.6

  • 83 is 2.4 points above the 80.6 average among 1,886 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

83 +4 pts vs 79

  • 83 is 4 points above the 79 average among 1,886 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Heritage JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 79.7 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 998th of 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 88 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 80 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8079.7 2,002 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,893 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
  • Academic Growth72 C−1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,827 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Heritage JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth72C8
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
767
Economically disadvantaged
66.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.2%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.5%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Heritage JH

African American: 12.2%Hispanic: 59.5%White: 24.8%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 0.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 12.2%
  • Hispanic 59.5%
  • White 24.8%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

African American: 11.6%Hispanic: 52.7%White: 29.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.6%
  • Hispanic 52.7%
  • White 29.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
765
Economically disadvantaged students
505
Emergent bilingual students
101
Special education students
149

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$66,000−$476 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50+7.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.2+1.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Heritage JH

Beginning: 3.6%1 to 5 years: 35.7%6 to 10 years: 18.3%11 to 20 years: 26.1%21 to 30 years: 12.5%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 3.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.5%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.4%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.7%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.7%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 020902045.