Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Hector J Garcia Early College HSA98vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Hector J Garcia Early College HS
Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 392 students
Current score
98/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+20.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,353 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
8 of 2,353tied with 7 others
Score vs region
+12.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
7 of 505tied with 5 others
Score vs county
+9.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
3 of 76tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+17.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 3,915 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
27 of 3,915tied with 26 others
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 99 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,353 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 3,915 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
98+27.5 pts vs 70.5
98 is 27.5 points above
the 70.5 average among 2,192 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 2,192 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 10 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hector J Garcia Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,353 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 2,353 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
Hector J Garcia Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 5 others).
Hector J Garcia Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 76 rated schools in Webb County (tied with 1 other).
Hector J Garcia Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 3,915 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 3,915 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 26 others).
Hector J Garcia Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement98 A+27.5 vs similar economic context · 2,192 reporting
School Progress98 A+19.3 vs similar economic context · 2,187 reporting
Closing the Gaps99 A+24.1 vs similar economic context · 2,173 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 2,152 reporting
Relative Performance98 A+21.2 vs similar economic context · 2,186 reporting
Hector J Garcia Early College HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,353 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
98
A
—
School Progress
98
A
—
Closing the Gaps
99
A
—
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
98
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level99%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,192 reporting
Meets grade level91%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,192 reporting
Masters grade level47%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,192 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 reporting
Meets grade level97%+53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 reporting
Masters grade level43%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,183 reporting
Meets grade level68%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,183 reporting
Masters grade level29%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,183 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
Meets grade level98%+64 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
Masters grade level63%+49 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 726 reporting
Meets grade level96%+61 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 726 reporting
Masters grade level59%+44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 726 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,353 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
98.9%+8.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 249 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+9.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+9.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 249 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 250 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
83.4%
+16.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
95.6%
56.4%
+39.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
95.6%
20.5%
+75.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
71.4%
13.2%
+58.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
26.7%
+73.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
7.7%
33.7%
−26.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
2.9%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
6.8%
−6.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.5%
−6.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.6%
−2.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
7.3%
−7.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
3.3%
2.7%
+0.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
98
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
81
82.7% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
15
15.3% of graduates
Not trackable
2
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
98
Selected comparison
265.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
81
Selected comparison
102.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
82.7%
Selected comparison
37.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
+45.6 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
15.3%
Selected comparison
55.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
−39.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
2.0%
Selected comparison
7.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIV (009651)62
U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
392
Economically disadvantaged
89.8%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.6%−35.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
0.8%−17.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.7%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.8%−16.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Hector J Garcia Early College HS
Hispanic 98.5%
White 0.8%
Asian 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,353 reporting for every category shown · 2,353 in full cohort
African American 14.6%
Hispanic 75.5%
White 6.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,915 reporting for every category shown · 3,915 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 26.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
392
Economically disadvantaged students
352
Emergent bilingual students
14
Special education students
3
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
11
Students in TEA mobility denominator
396
TEA-published mobility rate
2.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 392 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
392
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
0
No change
Change since 2021–22
−7
Decrease · −1.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
392
Selected comparison
582.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,329 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Hector J Garcia Early College HS
School year
Students enrolledHector J Garcia Early College HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
399
First available year
624.5
2022–23
399
No change
620.6
2023–24
383
Decrease of 16 (4.0%)
611.4
2024–25
392
Increase of 9 (2.3%)
605.5
2025–26
392
No change
582.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
12
3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
12
3.09 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
388
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
13.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,483 rated schools reporting
−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.09
Selected comparison
31.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,595 rated schools reporting
−28.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hector J Garcia Early College HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
425
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
397
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
394
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
389
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
388
12
3.1%
12
3.09
13.2%
31.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hector J Garcia Early College HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
12
3.1%
12
3.09
13.2%
31.5
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Hector J Garcia Early College HS
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,564
Selected comparison
$13,020
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,340 rated schools reporting
−$2,456 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,564 per student for this campus, $17,272 per student for its parent district, Laredo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Hector J Garcia Early College HS
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,826
$12,618
$13,054
$8,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,916
$12,937
$13,108
$8,314
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,256 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,058
$13,776
$14,058
$8,826
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,264 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,429
$15,445
$14,797
$9,618
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,268 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,304
$19,935
$15,708
$11,129
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,287 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,082
$18,022
$16,792
$11,675
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,313 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,767
$18,312
$18,125
$12,508
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,326 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,564
$17,272
$18,972
$13,020
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,340 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,554+$435 vs similar economic context
Teachers
19−21.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20.6+6.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hector J Garcia Early College HS
1 to 5 years 5.3%
6 to 10 years 5.3%
11 to 20 years 52.6%
21 to 30 years 26.3%
Over 30 years 10.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,353 reporting for every category shown · 2,353 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,915 reporting for every category shown · 3,915 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hector J Garcia Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHector J Garcia Early College HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
23.7
15.2
Secondary languages other than English
19.1
18.3
Secondary math
22.7
16.7
Secondary science
23.4
17.8
Secondary social studies
28.4
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
12 measures
1of 2,192
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,192 that report this measure · tied with 9
1of 2,186
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,186 that report this measure · tied with 7
1of 2,056
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,056 that report this measure · tied with 25
1of 726
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 726 that report this measure · tied with 14
1of 492
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure · tied with 3
1of 492
All Subjects — Meets
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure
1of 492
Reading — Meets
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 485
Science — Meets
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 485 that report this measure
1of 298
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 298 that report this measure · tied with 4
1of 76
Reading — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 27
Social Studies — Meets
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure
1of 27
Social Studies — Masters
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 2,187
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,187 that report this measure · tied with 8
2of 76
Closing the Gaps
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 76
Math — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 298
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 298 that report this measure
3of 86
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure
3of 76
Overall score
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
5of 76
Science — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
6of 76
Attendance
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 86
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure
8of 76
All Subjects — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
18of 2,191
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,191 that report this measure · tied with 1
47of 2,183
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,183 that report this measure · tied with 7
56of 2,239
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,239 that report this measure · tied with 2
117of 2,183
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,183 that report this measure · tied with 22
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240901008.