Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hebbronville JH

Jim Hogg County · Region 01: Edinburg · 226 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−19 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−8.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,687 of 2,200tied with 120 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hebbronville JH is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 19 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,687th of 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 120 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHebbronville JH 8869787769 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6977.6 2,200 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7777.2 2,187 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7874.7 2,173 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6975.2 2,156 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8881.6 2,136 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement67 D−5.3 vs similar economic context · 2,036 reporting
  • School Progress75 C−3.9 vs similar economic context · 2,029 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps59 F−15.8 vs similar economic context · 2,015 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,984 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−2.2 vs similar economic context · 2,029 reporting
  • Hebbronville JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,200 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement67D3
School Progress75C5
Closing the Gaps59F1
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so Student Achievement (67) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level60%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level26%−41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 reporting
  • Meets grade level5%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,200 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
226
Economically disadvantaged
80.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.0%−25.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.7%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
22.8%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hebbronville JH

Hispanic: 96%White: 3.1%Two or More Races: 0.9%
  • Hispanic 96%
  • White 3.1%
  • Two or More Races 0.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,200 reporting for every category shown · 2,200 in full cohort

African American: 13.9%Hispanic: 68.3%White: 13.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 13.9%
  • Hispanic 68.3%
  • White 13.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
226
Economically disadvantaged students
182
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
42

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
232
TEA-published mobility rate
6.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 226 students in 2025–26, an increase of 5 (2.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
226

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+5

Increase · +2.3%

Change since 2021–22
−7

Decrease · −3.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
226
Selected comparison
628.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,170 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hebbronville JH
School yearStudents enrolledHebbronville JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 233 First available year 652.5
2022–23 240 Increase of 7 (3.0%) 655.2
2023–24 210 Decrease of 30 (12.5%) 649.4
2024–25 221 Increase of 11 (5.2%) 647.1
2025–26 226 Increase of 5 (2.3%) 628.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
53

22.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
231

99.57 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
232

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
22.8%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 rated schools reporting

+9.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
99.57
Selected comparison
32.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 rated schools reporting

+67.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hebbronville JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 283 Suppressed — 18 6.36 — 16.7
2021–22 240 53 22.1% 111 46.25 12.9% 30.9
2022–23 244 81 33.2% 278 113.93 13.8% 34
2023–24 218 46 21.1% 172 78.90 13.7% 34
2024–25 232 53 22.8% 231 99.57 13.3% 32.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hebbronville JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 53 22.8% 231 99.57 13.3% 32.3
In-school suspensions 45 19.4% 108 46.55 11.7% 23.4
Out-of-school suspensions 37 15.9% 85 36.64 8.2% 13
DAEP placements 22 9.5% 38 16.38 5.4% 6.5
Mandatory DAEP placements 10 4.3% 10 4.31 3.9% 4.5
Discretionary DAEP placements 17 7.3% 28 12.07 3.4% 4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Hebbronville JH
  • Parent district: Jim Hogg County ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,262
Selected comparison
$13,050

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting

−$1,788 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,262 per student for this campus, $19,388 per student for its parent district, Jim Hogg County ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHebbronville JHParent district: Jim Hogg County ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,062$16,131$13,054$8,148 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 rated schools reporting
2019$9,895$21,332$13,108$8,269 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 rated schools reporting
2020$11,257$18,042$14,058$8,780 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,108 rated schools reporting
2021$9,707$14,639$14,797$9,429 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,119 rated schools reporting
2022$11,859$18,805$15,708$10,857 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,137 rated schools reporting
2023$10,668$18,499$16,792$11,370 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,156 rated schools reporting
2024$14,754$21,062$18,125$12,303 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,172 rated schools reporting
2025$11,262$19,388$18,972$13,050 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,732−$421 vs similar economic context
Teachers
16−27.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14−0.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hebbronville JH

1 to 5 years: 36.6%6 to 10 years: 25.5%11 to 20 years: 18.6%21 to 30 years: 1.2%Over 30 years: 17.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 36.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 25.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 1.2%
  • Over 30 years 17.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,200 reporting for every category shown · 2,200 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hebbronville JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHebbronville JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 616.517.7
Secondary English17.415.3
Secondary languages other than English20.318.3
Secondary math17.516.6
Secondary science14.717.8
Secondary social studies18.917.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 124901041.