Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Haynes Elem

Bell County · Region 12: Waco · 779 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
782 of 2,005tied with 74 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.8 average for 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 7 points

76 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 3.2 points above the 79.8 average among 2,005 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 15 points

71 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 9 points above the 77 average among 1,873 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 47.7% avg · +2.3 pts
Masters
22%vs 19.4% avg · +2.6 pts

Among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Haynes Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 782nd of 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 74 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHaynes Elem 8872777683 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8379.8 2,005 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7679.5 1,981 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7777.6 1,967 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7278.2 1,934 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8882.1 1,913 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • School Progress82 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,891 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,873 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,891 reporting
  • Haynes Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,005 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level77%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,005 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
779
Economically disadvantaged
65.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.2%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.4%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Haynes Elem

African American: 41.5%Hispanic: 32%White: 8.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.8%Pacific Islander: 2.8%Two or More Races: 11.9%
  • African American 41.5%
  • Hispanic 32%
  • White 8.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.8%
  • Pacific Islander 2.8%
  • Two or More Races 11.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting for every category shown · 2,005 in full cohort

African American: 11.5%Hispanic: 52.3%White: 29.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.5%
  • Hispanic 52.3%
  • White 29.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
779
Economically disadvantaged students
511
Emergent bilingual students
64
Special education students
206

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
125
Students in TEA mobility denominator
689
TEA-published mobility rate
18.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 779 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 32 (3.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
779

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−32

Decrease · −3.9%

Change since 2021–22
−46

Decrease · −5.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
779
Selected comparison
626.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Haynes Elem
School yearStudents enrolledHaynes ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 825 First available year 641.7
2022–23 780 Decrease of 45 (5.5%) 647.7
2023–24 768 Decrease of 12 (1.5%) 645.8
2024–25 811 Increase of 43 (5.6%) 642.4
2025–26 779 Decrease of 32 (3.9%) 626.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
93

10.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
286

32.61 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
877

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.6%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,546 rated schools reporting

−2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
32.61
Selected comparison
30.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting

+2.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Haynes Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,030 107 10.4% 324 31.46 9.8% 19.5
2021–22 896 100 11.2% 298 33.26 12.9% 30.3
2022–23 852 99 11.6% 270 31.69 13.4% 32.1
2023–24 856 108 12.6% 275 32.13 13.2% 31.9
2024–25 877 93 10.6% 286 32.61 12.9% 30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Haynes Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 93 10.6% 286 32.61 12.9% 30.4
In-school suspensions 93 10.6% 279 31.81 11.5% 23
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Haynes Elem
  • Parent district: Killeen ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,708
Selected comparison
$12,728

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting

−$3,020 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,708 per student for this campus, $14,322 per student for its parent district, Killeen ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHaynes ElemParent district: Killeen ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,239$9,955$13,054$7,954 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2019$6,419$10,689$13,108$8,118 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 rated schools reporting
2020$6,857$13,484$14,058$8,697 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 rated schools reporting
2021$7,368$14,264$14,797$9,165 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 rated schools reporting
2022$8,402$13,404$15,708$10,503 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 rated schools reporting
2023$9,800$14,811$16,792$11,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 rated schools reporting
2024$10,448$15,038$18,125$12,096 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,964 rated schools reporting
2025$9,708$14,322$18,972$12,728 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,176+$3,750 vs similar economic context
Teachers
53+10.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7+0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Haynes Elem

Beginning: 5.5%1 to 5 years: 33.3%6 to 10 years: 25.9%11 to 20 years: 24%21 to 30 years: 9.3%Over 30 years: 1.9%
  • Beginning 5.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 25.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 24%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.3%
  • Over 30 years 1.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting for every category shown · 2,005 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.4%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.8%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Haynes Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHaynes Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.618
Grade 119.318.3
Grade 222.518.4
Grade 320.218.6
Grade 41919
Grade 524.119.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 014906138.