+11.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 156 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
24 of 156tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.9 ptsvs 86.1 average · 92 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
24 of 92tied with 9 others
Score vs state
+11.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
105 of 829tied with 30 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.5 average for 156 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 86.1 average for 92 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
92+18.4 pts vs 73.6
92 is 18.4 points above
the 73.6 average among 144 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 3rd of 144 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 charter campuses share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 156 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 156 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.1 average for 92 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 92 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 9 others).
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+12.9 vs similar economic context · 156 reporting
School Progress93 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 156 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+14.6 vs similar economic context · 151 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+18.4 vs similar economic context · 144 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+12.7 vs similar economic context · 154 reporting
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (156 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting
Meets grade level77%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting
Masters grade level51%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting
Meets grade level82%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting
Masters grade level58%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 reporting
Meets grade level75%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 reporting
Masters grade level46%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 149 reporting
Meets grade level79%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 149 reporting
Masters grade level54%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 149 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 reporting
Meets grade level59%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 reporting
Masters grade level39%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (156 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,511
Economically disadvantaged
63.9%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.0%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.2%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.5%−16.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
African American 24%
Hispanic 21%
White 12.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 40.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting for every category shown · 156 in full cohort
African American 21.4%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 14.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 92 reporting for every category shown · 92 in full cohort
African American 14.5%
Hispanic 55%
White 14.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 12.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,510
Economically disadvantaged students
965
Emergent bilingual students
392
Special education students
124
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
84
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,408
TEA-published mobility rate
6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,511 students in 2025–26, an increase of 40 (2.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,511
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+40
Increase · +2.7%
Change since 2021–22
+878
Increase · +138.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,511
Selected comparison
499.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
School year
Students enrolledHarmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
633
First available year
464.3
2022–23
1,339
Increase of 706 (111.5%)
485.4
2023–24
1,439
Increase of 100 (7.5%)
493.3
2024–25
1,471
Increase of 32 (2.2%)
496
2025–26
1,511
Increase of 40 (2.7%)
499.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
90
5.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
114
7.49 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,522
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.9%
Selected comparison
10.1%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
7.49
Selected comparison
16.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting
−9.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
671
Suppressed
—
12
1.79
—
6.5
2021–22
650
71
10.9%
105
16.15
10.3%
17.1
2022–23
1,435
91
6.3%
159
11.08
10.5%
16.2
2023–24
1,500
85
5.7%
109
7.27
10.3%
18.3
2024–25
1,522
90
5.9%
114
7.49
10.1%
16.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
90
5.9%
114
7.49
10.1%
16.6
In-school suspensions
56
3.7%
63
4.14
5.9%
8.4
Out-of-school suspensions
41
2.7%
46
3.02
8.2%
11.6
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
Parent district: Harmony Public Schools - Houston West
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,348
Selected comparison
$11,700
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
−$1,352 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,348 per student for this campus, $12,419 per student for its parent district, Harmony Public Schools - Houston West, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
Parent district: Harmony Public Schools - Houston West
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2019
$9,429
$9,940
$13,108
$8,647
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$9,306
$10,532
$14,058
$9,148
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$9,262
$10,590
$14,797
$9,408
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 126 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$10,749
$12,486
$15,708
$10,983
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$10,068
$12,079
$16,792
$11,223
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 135 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$10,912
$12,672
$18,125
$11,697
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$10,348
$12,419
$18,972
$11,700
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,430+$4,319 vs similar economic context
Teachers
92+62.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.5−1.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land
Beginning 10.7%
1 to 5 years 33.8%
6 to 10 years 31.6%
11 to 20 years 21.7%
21 to 30 years 1.1%
Over 30 years 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 156 reporting for every category shown · 156 in full cohort
Beginning 16%
1 to 5 years 43.2%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 15.5%
21 to 30 years 4.6%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 92 reporting for every category shown · 92 in full cohort
Beginning 13.2%
1 to 5 years 41.3%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 16.1%
21 to 30 years 4.1%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Harmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHarmony School of Excellence - Sugar Land · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
27
20.6
Grade 1
29.3
22.4
Grade 2
28.8
23.1
Grade 3
28.3
22.9
Grade 4
21.8
23.3
Grade 5
24.4
23.1
Grade 6
24.3
21.6
Secondary English
25.5
15.9
Secondary languages other than English
22.1
15.9
Secondary math
24.9
16.1
Secondary science
25.3
17.1
Secondary social studies
25.9
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 156
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 156 that report this measure
2of 92
Academic Growth
Similar size · of the 92 that report this measure
3of 156
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 156 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
12 measures
4of 156
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 156 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 156
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 156 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 156
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 156 that report this measure
4of 154
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 154 that report this measure
4of 149
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 149 that report this measure
4of 90
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure
5of 154
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 154 that report this measure
6of 156
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 156 that report this measure
7of 149
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 149 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 154
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 154 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 90
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 110
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 110 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101862006.