Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Hackney Learning Center

Angelina County · Region 07: Kilgore · 106 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
67/1002025-26
Change
+10 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−10.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,202 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,824 of 2,202tied with 43 others
D67

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 66 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,202 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hackney Learning Center is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,202 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,824th of 2,202 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 43 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. After high school: the following fall
  7. Who this school serves
  8. Student counts behind the percentages
  9. Enrollment over time
  10. Discipline and removal from class
  11. Teachers
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Graduation Rate

TEA track year 1

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
34.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
9.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHackney Learning Center 5786778867 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 66 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6777.6 2,202 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8877.3 2,183 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7773.9 2,165 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8673.5 2,155 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22F5781.9 2,128 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement69 D−1.4 vs similar economic context · 2,042 reporting
  • School Progress65 D−13.7 vs similar economic context · 2,038 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps61 D−13.9 vs similar economic context · 2,023 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73 · 2,005 reporting
  • Relative Performance65 D−11.8 vs similar economic context · 2,037 reporting
  • Hackney Learning Center
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,202 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement69D1
School Progress65D5
Closing the Gaps61D9
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance65D5

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (69), so School Progress (65) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 69.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level44%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,042 reporting
  • Meets grade level10%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,042 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,042 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level24%−45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 reporting
  • Meets grade level8%−36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level27%−39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
  • Meets grade level6%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 655 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 655 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 655 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,202 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
67.8%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
56.4%−13.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
55.3%−15.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
5.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
20.0%−63.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria20.0%83.8%−63.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 264 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course4.3%56.9%−52.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%20.2%−20.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%13.7%−13.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course6.5%26.5%−20.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%33.5%−33.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate2.2%2.9%−0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.7%−6.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.5%−6.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.2%2.5%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.3%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces6.5%2.7%+3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
30

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
6

20.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
24

80.0% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
30
Selected comparison
264.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
6
Selected comparison
100.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
20.0%
Selected comparison
36.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting

−16.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
80.0%
Selected comparison
55.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting

+24.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
8.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting

−8.0 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. ANGELINA COLLEGE (006661)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
106
Economically disadvantaged
91.5%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
22.6%−17.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.4%+8.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
59.0%−34.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
93.8%+70.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hackney Learning Center

African American: 37.7%Hispanic: 43.4%White: 17%Two or More Races: 1.9%
  • African American 37.7%
  • Hispanic 43.4%
  • White 17%
  • Two or More Races 1.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 reporting for every category shown · 2,202 in full cohort

African American: 14.8%Hispanic: 76.2%White: 5.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 14.8%
  • Hispanic 76.2%
  • White 5.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
106
Economically disadvantaged students
97
Emergent bilingual students
24
Special education students
28

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
84
Students in TEA mobility denominator
99
TEA-published mobility rate
84.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 106 students in 2025–26, an increase of 50 (89.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
106

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+50

Increase · +89.3%

Change since 2021–22
+74

Increase · +231.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
106
Selected comparison
574

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,179 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hackney Learning Center
School yearStudents enrolledHackney Learning CenterChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 32 First available year 619.1
2022–23 35 Increase of 3 (9.4%) 615.6
2023–24 45 Increase of 10 (28.6%) 605.6
2024–25 56 Increase of 11 (24.4%) 598.9
2025–26 106 Increase of 50 (89.3%) 574

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
98

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hackney Learning Center
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 102 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 72 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 66 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 93 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 98 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hackney Learning Center in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Teachers

Average salary
$64,924−$3,309 vs similar economic context
Teachers
4−36.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
28.6+14.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hackney Learning Center

Beginning: 73%6 to 10 years: 27%
  • Beginning 73%
  • 6 to 10 years 27%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 reporting for every category shown · 2,202 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.3%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.3%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 170 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 8of 13

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Angelina County · of the 13 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 14of 265

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 265 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 003903004.