Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Grapevine MS

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 618 students

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.8 ptsvs 83.2 average · 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
605 of 1,511tied with 69 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.2 average for 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

83 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 2.8 points above the 83.2 average among 1,511 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 8 points

84 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 92 is 11.5 points above the 80.5 average among 1,456 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 49.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Masters
27%vs 20.6% avg · +6.4 pts

Among 1,463 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Grapevine MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.2 average for 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 605th of 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 69 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGrapevine MS 8780808386 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8683.2 1,511 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8383.5 1,479 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8081.5 1,453 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8082.1 1,438 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8784.3 1,419 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,468 reporting
  • School Progress84 B+2.0 vs similar economic context · 1,465 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+11.5 vs similar economic context · 1,456 reporting
  • Academic Growth84 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,439 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,465 reporting
  • Grapevine MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,511 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress84B6
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth84B6
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (84), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 84.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level53%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 755 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 755 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 755 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,511 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
618
Economically disadvantaged
44.5%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.9%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.9%+8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.8%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Grapevine MS

African American: 8.3%Hispanic: 44%White: 39.6%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 3.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.5%
  • African American 8.3%
  • Hispanic 44%
  • White 39.6%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 3.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting for every category shown · 1,511 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 38%White: 44.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 38%
  • White 44.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
618
Economically disadvantaged students
275
Emergent bilingual students
129
Special education students
166

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
66
Students in TEA mobility denominator
678
TEA-published mobility rate
9.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 618 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 17 (2.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
618

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−17

Decrease · −2.7%

Change since 2021–22
−74

Decrease · −10.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
618
Selected comparison
679.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,473 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Grapevine MS
School yearStudents enrolledGrapevine MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 692 First available year 677.4
2022–23 652 Decrease of 40 (5.8%) 682.9
2023–24 656 Increase of 4 (0.6%) 683.7
2024–25 635 Decrease of 21 (3.2%) 679.8
2025–26 618 Decrease of 17 (2.7%) 679.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
120

17.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
267

39.50 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
676

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
17.8%
Selected comparison
11.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 rated schools reporting

+6.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
39.5
Selected comparison
24.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 rated schools reporting

+14.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Grapevine MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 733 32 4.4% 51 6.96 9.4% 17.8
2021–22 727 104 14.3% 252 34.66 11.4% 24.4
2022–23 697 130 18.6% 329 47.20 11.7% 25.7
2023–24 687 114 16.6% 235 34.21 11.7% 26.3
2024–25 676 120 17.8% 267 39.50 11.3% 24.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Grapevine MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 120 17.8% 267 39.50 11.3% 24.7
In-school suspensions 112 16.6% 207 30.62 10.2% 19
Out-of-school suspensions 39 5.8% 44 6.51 5.5% 7.7
DAEP placements 15 2.2% 16 2.37 4.2% 4.9
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Grapevine MS
  • Parent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,124
Selected comparison
$12,069

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting

−$945 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,124 per student for this campus, $16,051 per student for its parent district, Grapevine-Colleyville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGrapevine MSParent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,640$18,978$13,054$7,815 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 rated schools reporting
2019$8,913$16,422$13,108$8,019 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting
2020$8,829$15,562$14,058$8,457 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,387 rated schools reporting
2021$9,956$16,369$14,797$8,872 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting
2022$10,421$16,148$15,708$10,244 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 rated schools reporting
2023$10,194$16,187$16,792$10,642 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,438 rated schools reporting
2024$11,200$15,750$18,125$11,681 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 rated schools reporting
2025$11,124$16,051$18,972$12,069 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,717−$1,483 vs similar economic context
Teachers
52+7.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.9−8.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Grapevine MS

Beginning: 12.9%1 to 5 years: 56.2%6 to 10 years: 10.4%11 to 20 years: 17.9%21 to 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 12.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 56.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting for every category shown · 1,511 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.3%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Grapevine MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGrapevine MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 614.817.9
Secondary English16.815.4
Secondary languages other than English1917.8
Secondary math16.916.4
Secondary science19.117.9
Secondary social studies19.217.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220906041.