Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Good Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 610 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,925 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
301 of 1,925tied with 68 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,925 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

87 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 9.1 points above the 80.9 average among 1,925 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 14 points

77 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 11.4 points above the 79.6 average among 1,848 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
62%vs 50.3% avg · +11.7 pts
Masters
43%vs 20.9% avg · +22.1 pts

Among 1,848 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Good Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,925 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 301st of 1,925 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGood Elem 8785818790 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9080.9 1,925 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8780.8 1,898 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8178.8 1,877 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8579.4 1,845 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8782.6 1,819 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+11.4 vs similar economic context · 1,848 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,841 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 1,824 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+12.5 vs similar economic context · 1,788 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,841 reporting
  • Good Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,925 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance90A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,836 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,836 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,836 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,925 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
610
Economically disadvantaged
58.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
46.9%+31.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.8%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.7%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Good Elem

African American: 3.1%Hispanic: 65.6%White: 6.9%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 20.5%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 3.1%
  • Hispanic 65.6%
  • White 6.9%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 20.5%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 reporting for every category shown · 1,925 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 46.8%White: 36.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 46.8%
  • White 36.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
610
Economically disadvantaged students
357
Emergent bilingual students
286
Special education students
139

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
30
Students in TEA mobility denominator
386
TEA-published mobility rate
7.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 610 students in 2025–26, an increase of 111 (22.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
610

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+111

Increase · +22.2%

Change since 2021–22
+136

Increase · +28.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
610
Selected comparison
632.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Good Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGood ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 474 First available year 638.2
2022–23 520 Increase of 46 (9.7%) 643.1
2023–24 515 Decrease of 5 (1.0%) 641.9
2024–25 499 Decrease of 16 (3.1%) 639.4
2025–26 610 Increase of 111 (22.2%) 632.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
525

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Good Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 524 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 517 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 560 Suppressed — 20 3.57 — 30
2023–24 539 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 525 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Good Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Good Elem
  • Parent district: Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,419
Selected comparison
$12,411

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 rated schools reporting

−$992 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,419 per student for this campus, $21,031 per student for its parent district, Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGood ElemParent district: Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,701$11,879$13,054$7,922 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,752 rated schools reporting
2019$7,881$14,148$13,108$8,086 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 rated schools reporting
2020$8,664$14,789$14,058$8,694 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,791 rated schools reporting
2021$9,810$17,995$14,797$9,050 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 rated schools reporting
2022$11,678$20,893$15,708$10,434 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 rated schools reporting
2023$11,307$18,021$16,792$10,962 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting
2024$11,403$17,883$18,125$11,794 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 rated schools reporting
2025$11,419$21,031$18,972$12,411 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,132+$3,670 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42+0.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5−4.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Good Elem

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 28.6%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 35.7%21 to 30 years: 9.5%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.5%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 reporting for every category shown · 1,925 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.2%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.2%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Good Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGood Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.617.9
Grade 118.618.2
Grade 219.618.4
Grade 317.818.7
Grade 419.618.9
Grade 520.119.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

3 measures

  • 34of 1,848

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,848 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 34of 1,836

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,836 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 53of 1,845

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,845 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057903105.