Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Glenhope Elem

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 545 students

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.5 ptsvs 91.5 average · 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
46 of 502tied with 48 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.5 average for 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

93 to 95 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 95 is 3.5 points above the 91.5 average among 502 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 4 points

90 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 94 is 4.9 points above the 89.1 average among 489 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
84%vs 76% avg · +8 pts
Masters
64%vs 46.4% avg · +17.6 pts

Among 494 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Glenhope Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.5 average for 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 46th of 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGlenhope Elem 9495959395 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9591.5 502 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9392.0 492 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9591.1 479 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9591.5 467 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9492.1 457 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+2.4 vs similar economic context · 494 reporting
  • School Progress95 A+7.2 vs similar economic context · 492 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+4.9 vs similar economic context · 489 reporting
  • Academic Growth95 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 489 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+8.6 vs similar economic context · 492 reporting
  • Glenhope Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (502 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress95A—
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth95A—
Relative Performance87B3

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Masters grade level64%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Masters grade level67%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 492 reporting
  • Meets grade level85%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 492 reporting
  • Masters grade level64%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 492 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (502 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
545
Economically disadvantaged
8.1%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.0%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.2%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.3%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Glenhope Elem

African American: 4.1%Hispanic: 11.1%White: 60.9%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 15.9%Two or More Races: 7.4%
  • African American 4.1%
  • Hispanic 11.1%
  • White 60.9%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 15.9%
  • Two or More Races 7.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting for every category shown · 502 in full cohort

African American: 5%Hispanic: 17.8%White: 48.7%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 22.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 5%
  • Hispanic 17.8%
  • White 48.7%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 22.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
540
Economically disadvantaged students
44
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
65

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
23
Students in TEA mobility denominator
518
TEA-published mobility rate
4.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 545 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (3.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
545

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−22

Decrease · −3.9%

Change since 2021–22
+49

Increase · +9.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
545
Selected comparison
867.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 497 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Glenhope Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGlenhope ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 496 First available year 874.6
2022–23 503 Increase of 7 (1.4%) 893.3
2023–24 546 Increase of 43 (8.5%) 885.4
2024–25 567 Increase of 21 (3.8%) 877.4
2025–26 545 Decrease of 22 (3.9%) 867.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
22

3.80 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
579

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.8
Selected comparison
8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 339 rated schools reporting

−4.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Glenhope Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 464 Suppressed — 10 2.16 — 5.2
2021–22 503 Suppressed — 17 3.38 — 8
2022–23 510 Suppressed — 16 3.14 — 8.1
2023–24 558 13 2.3% 23 4.12 4.8% 8.1
2024–25 579 Suppressed — 22 3.80 — 8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Glenhope Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 22 3.80 — 8
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 21 3.63 — 6.4
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Glenhope Elem
  • Parent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,713
Selected comparison
$10,744

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting

−$2,031 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,713 per student for this campus, $16,051 per student for its parent district, Grapevine-Colleyville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGlenhope ElemParent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,997$18,978$13,054$7,238 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting
2019$7,817$16,422$13,108$7,322 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting
2020$7,938$15,562$14,058$7,627 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting
2021$8,920$16,369$14,797$8,248 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
2022$9,713$16,148$15,708$9,419 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
2023$9,603$16,187$16,792$9,497 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 rated schools reporting
2024$8,665$15,750$18,125$10,156 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 479 rated schools reporting
2025$8,713$16,051$18,972$10,744 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,987−$1,444 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−19.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7−0.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Glenhope Elem

Beginning: 2.7%1 to 5 years: 30.1%6 to 10 years: 21%11 to 20 years: 30.1%21 to 30 years: 16.4%
  • Beginning 2.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 21%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting for every category shown · 502 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.7%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Glenhope Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGlenhope Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten18.219
Grade 118.119.2
Grade 220.219.7
Grade 32021.6
Grade 418.220.5
Grade 528.722.4
Grade 617.819.2
Secondary math2.718.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 449

    Academic Growth

    Tarrant County · of the 449 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 810

    Math — Masters

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 456

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure

  • 5of 457

    Attendance

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure

  • 7of 813

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure

  • 7of 812

    Reading — Masters

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 812 that report this measure · tied with 2

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

11 measures

  • 12of 810

    Math — Meets

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure

  • 13of 456

    School Progress

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 14of 455

    Math — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 16of 457

    All Subjects — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 16of 399

    Science — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 18of 456

    Reading — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 19of 466

    Overall score

    Tarrant County · of the 466 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 19of 453

    Closing the Gaps

    Tarrant County · of the 453 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 22of 457

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 22of 456

    Reading — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 24of 813

    Student Achievement

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 16

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220906111.