Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

George West Elem

Live Oak County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 243 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
271 of 2,011tied with 63 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.7 average for 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
71%vs 47.5% avg · +23.5 pts
Masters
36%vs 19.2% avg · +16.8 pts

Among 1,903 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 41.8% avg · +24.2 pts
Masters
28%vs 16% avg · +12 pts

Among 1,892 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
82%vs 52.3% avg · +29.7 pts
Masters
50%vs 20.9% avg · +29.1 pts

Among 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

George West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 271st of 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGeorge West Elem 8983869190 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9079.7 2,011 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9179.4 1,989 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8677.5 1,974 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8378.1 1,942 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8982.1 1,921 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,903 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps84 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,837 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+13.0 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
  • George West Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,011 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps84B6
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance92A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,011 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
243
Economically disadvantaged
66.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.2%−12.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.6%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.8%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

George West Elem

Hispanic: 58.4%White: 37.9%Asian: 0.8%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • Hispanic 58.4%
  • White 37.9%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting for every category shown · 2,011 in full cohort

African American: 11.7%Hispanic: 53.1%White: 28.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.7%
  • Hispanic 53.1%
  • White 28.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
243
Economically disadvantaged students
161
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
33

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
36
Students in TEA mobility denominator
257
TEA-published mobility rate
14%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 243 students in 2025–26, an increase of 8 (3.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
243

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+8

Increase · +3.4%

Change since 2021–22
+4

Increase · +1.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
243
Selected comparison
629.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for George West Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGeorge West ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 239 First available year 645.1
2022–23 249 Increase of 10 (4.2%) 651.1
2023–24 234 Decrease of 15 (6.0%) 648.8
2024–25 235 Increase of 1 (0.4%) 644.7
2025–26 243 Increase of 8 (3.4%) 629.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27

10.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
50

19.46 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
257

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.5%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,549 rated schools reporting

−2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
19.46
Selected comparison
30.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 rated schools reporting

−11.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for George West Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 241 21 8.7% 45 18.67 9.7% 19.4
2021–22 264 30 11.4% 62 23.48 13.0% 30.5
2022–23 261 24 9.2% 39 14.94 13.4% 32.3
2023–24 243 22 9.1% 45 18.52 13.2% 31.9
2024–25 257 27 10.5% 50 19.46 12.9% 30.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for George West Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 27 10.5% 50 19.46 12.9% 30.5
In-school suspensions 25 9.7% 39 15.18 11.5% 23.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$23k20182020202220242025
  • George West Elem
  • Parent district: George West ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,923
Selected comparison
$12,759

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting

−$3,836 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,923 per student for this campus, $22,233 per student for its parent district, George West ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGeorge West ElemParent district: George West ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,899$13,052$13,054$7,971 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 rated schools reporting
2019$7,068$12,593$13,108$8,128 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,867 rated schools reporting
2020$7,060$12,027$14,058$8,700 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 rated schools reporting
2021$9,003$13,789$14,797$9,172 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2022$10,109$16,574$15,708$10,480 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 rated schools reporting
2023$9,670$14,632$16,792$11,203 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting
2024$9,918$15,789$18,125$12,092 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 rated schools reporting
2025$8,923$22,233$18,972$12,759 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,993−$3,488 vs similar economic context
Teachers
15−27.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9+2.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

George West Elem

1 to 5 years: 25.7%6 to 10 years: 30.9%11 to 20 years: 25%21 to 30 years: 5.9%Over 30 years: 12.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 25%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.9%
  • Over 30 years 12.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting for every category shown · 2,011 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.4%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.7%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.7%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for George West Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGeorge West Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 424.319
Grade 521.719.9
Grade 621.717.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 164

    Reading — Masters

    Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 6of 164

    Reading — Approaches

    Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 164

    Reading — Meets

    Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 164

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

4 measures

  • 63of 1,903

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,903 that report this measure · tied with 9

  • 71of 1,892

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,892 that report this measure · tied with 28

  • 79of 1,903

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,903 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 83of 1,892

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,892 that report this measure · tied with 11

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 149901101.