+10.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
271 of 2,011tied with 63 others
Score vs region
+9.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi
Region 02: Corpus Christi placement
25 of 191tied with 9 others
Score vs county
+5.8 ptsvs 84.2 average · 6 rated schools in Live Oak County
Score vs similar-size group
+9.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 1,829 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
357 of 1,829tied with 64 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.7 average for 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is above the 84.2 average for 6 rated schools in Live Oak County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 1,829 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
71%vs 47.5% avg · +23.5 pts
Masters
36%vs 19.2% avg · +16.8 pts
Among 1,903 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
George West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 271st of 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).
George West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 25th of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 9 others).
George West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.2 average for 6 rated schools in Live Oak County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
George West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 1,829 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 357th of 1,829 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 64 others).
George West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,903 reporting
School Progress92 A+11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
Closing the Gaps84 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,837 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+13.0 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
George West Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,011 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
84
B
6
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
92
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Meets grade level71%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Masters grade level36%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Meets grade level82%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Masters grade level50%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Meets grade level66%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Masters grade level28%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Meets grade level49%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,011 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
243
Economically disadvantaged
66.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.2%−12.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.6%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.8%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
George West Elem
Hispanic 58.4%
White 37.9%
Asian 0.8%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting for every category shown · 2,011 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 53.1%
White 28.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 77.5%
White 17.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Live Oak County · 6 reporting for every category shown · 6 in full cohort
African American 0.4%
Hispanic 63.3%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,829 reporting for every category shown · 1,829 in full cohort
African American 9.6%
Hispanic 50.5%
White 35%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
243
Economically disadvantaged students
161
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
33
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
36
Students in TEA mobility denominator
257
TEA-published mobility rate
14%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 243 students in 2025–26, an increase of 8 (3.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
243
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+8
Increase · +3.4%
Change since 2021–22
+4
Increase · +1.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
243
Selected comparison
629.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for George West Elem
School year
Students enrolledGeorge West Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
239
First available year
645.1
2022–23
249
Increase of 10 (4.2%)
651.1
2023–24
234
Decrease of 15 (6.0%)
648.8
2024–25
235
Increase of 1 (0.4%)
644.7
2025–26
243
Increase of 8 (3.4%)
629.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27
10.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
50
19.46 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
257
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
10.5%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,549 rated schools reporting
−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
19.46
Selected comparison
30.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 rated schools reporting
−11.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for George West Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
241
21
8.7%
45
18.67
9.7%
19.4
2021–22
264
30
11.4%
62
23.48
13.0%
30.5
2022–23
261
24
9.2%
39
14.94
13.4%
32.3
2023–24
243
22
9.1%
45
18.52
13.2%
31.9
2024–25
257
27
10.5%
50
19.46
12.9%
30.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for George West Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
27
10.5%
50
19.46
12.9%
30.5
In-school suspensions
25
9.7%
39
15.18
11.5%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
George West Elem
Parent district: George West ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,923
Selected comparison
$12,759
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
−$3,836 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,923 per student for this campus, $22,233 per student for its parent district, George West ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
George West Elem
Parent district: George West ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,899
$13,052
$13,054
$7,971
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,068
$12,593
$13,108
$8,128
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,867 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,060
$12,027
$14,058
$8,700
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,003
$13,789
$14,797
$9,172
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,109
$16,574
$15,708
$10,480
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,670
$14,632
$16,792
$11,203
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,918
$15,789
$18,125
$12,092
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,923
$22,233
$18,972
$12,759
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$62,993−$3,488 vs similar economic context
Teachers
15−27.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9+2.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
George West Elem
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 30.9%
11 to 20 years 25%
21 to 30 years 5.9%
Over 30 years 12.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting for every category shown · 2,011 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Live Oak County · 6 reporting for every category shown · 6 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 16.1%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 35.7%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,829 reporting for every category shown · 1,829 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 17.9%
11 to 20 years 28.5%
21 to 30 years 17.5%
Over 30 years 4.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for George West Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classGeorge West Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 4
24.3
19
Grade 5
21.7
19.9
Grade 6
21.7
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 164
Reading — Masters
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
6of 164
Reading — Approaches
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 164
Reading — Meets
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 164
All Subjects — Masters
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
63of 1,903
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,903 that report this measure · tied with 9
71of 1,892
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,892 that report this measure · tied with 28
79of 1,903
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,903 that report this measure · tied with 5
83of 1,892
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,892 that report this measure · tied with 11
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 149901101.