Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Geneva Heights Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 462 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.8 ptsvs 83.2 average · 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
512 of 1,509tied with 90 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 72 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.2 average for 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 4 points

83 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 3.8 points above the 83.2 average among 1,509 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 9 points

80 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 89 is 12.3 points above the 76.7 average among 1,438 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
61%vs 55.8% avg · +5.2 pts
Masters
43%vs 25% avg · +18 pts

Among 1,467 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Geneva Heights Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.2 average for 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 512th of 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGeneva Heights Elem 7487648387 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8783.2 1,509 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8383.5 1,478 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6481.5 1,452 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8782.1 1,437 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7484.3 1,419 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,467 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 1,464 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps77 C−3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,455 reporting
  • Academic Growth89 B+12.3 vs similar economic context · 1,438 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,464 reporting
  • Geneva Heights Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,509 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps77C3
Academic Growth89B1
Relative Performance86B4

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,509 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
462
Economically disadvantaged
44.6%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
15.4%+3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.6%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.8%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Geneva Heights Elem

African American: 15.4%Hispanic: 40.9%White: 36.6%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.5%
  • African American 15.4%
  • Hispanic 40.9%
  • White 36.6%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,509 reporting for every category shown · 1,509 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 38%White: 44.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 38%
  • White 44.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
462
Economically disadvantaged students
206
Emergent bilingual students
71
Special education students
72

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
235
TEA-published mobility rate
10.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 462 students in 2025–26, an increase of 82 (21.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
462

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+82

Increase · +21.6%

Change since 2021–22
−52

Decrease · −10.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
462
Selected comparison
680.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,471 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Geneva Heights Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGeneva Heights ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 514 First available year 677.5
2022–23 341 Decrease of 173 (33.7%) 683.3
2023–24 299 Decrease of 42 (12.3%) 684
2024–25 380 Increase of 81 (27.1%) 680.1
2025–26 462 Increase of 82 (21.6%) 680.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
403

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Geneva Heights Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 514 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 550 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 365 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 323 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 403 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Geneva Heights Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$58k$108k20182020202220242025
  • Geneva Heights Elem
  • Parent district: Dallas ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$25,436
Selected comparison
$12,061

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting

+$13,375 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $25,436 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGeneva Heights ElemParent district: Dallas ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,006$13,363$13,054$7,814 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 rated schools reporting
2019$9,658$13,990$13,108$8,019 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting
2020$9,665$14,981$14,058$8,456 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,387 rated schools reporting
2021$10,191$17,075$14,797$8,871 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting
2022$13,729$18,716$15,708$10,242 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 rated schools reporting
2023$36,135$20,932$16,792$10,639 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,437 rated schools reporting
2024$103,191$22,990$18,125$11,680 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,453 rated schools reporting
2025$25,436$23,271$18,972$12,061 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,121+$5,920 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−12.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.4−6.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Geneva Heights Elem

Beginning: 3.1%1 to 5 years: 31.3%6 to 10 years: 28.1%11 to 20 years: 34.4%21 to 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 3.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,509 reporting for every category shown · 1,509 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.3%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Geneva Heights Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGeneva Heights Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten14.418
Grade 122.118.4
Grade 216.918.6
Grade 316.119.3
Grade 424.619.2
Grade 516.720.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

3 measures

  • 35of 1,466

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,466 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 57of 1,140

    Per-student spending

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,140 that report this measure

  • 64of 1,467

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,467 that report this measure · tied with 7

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905174.