Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Friends for Life MSA94vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Open-enrollment charter campus
Friends for Life MS
Amigos Por Vida-Friends for Life Pub Chtr Sch · Houston · 243 students
Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+14.0 ptsvs 80 average · 287 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
16 of 287tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 194 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
15 of 194tied with 2 others
Score vs state
+12.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
74 of 829tied with 30 others
A94
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 80 average for 287 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 194 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 39.1% avg · +40.9 pts
Masters
60%vs 15.5% avg · +44.5 pts
Among 267 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 267 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Friends for Life MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 287 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2022-23.
Ranks 16th of 287 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).
Friends for Life MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 194 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 1 point since 2022-23.
Ranks 15th of 194 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 2 others).
Friends for Life MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 1 point since 2022-23.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+18.0 vs similar economic context · 287 reporting
School Progress94 A+12.9 vs similar economic context · 287 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+16.4 vs similar economic context · 282 reporting
Academic Growth89 B+15.9 vs similar economic context · 273 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 283 reporting
Friends for Life MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (287 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
89
B
1
Relative Performance
94
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (94), so
Student Achievement (92) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting
Meets grade level71%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting
Masters grade level41%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting
Meets grade level69%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting
Masters grade level39%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 reporting
Meets grade level71%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 reporting
Masters grade level39%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Meets grade level80%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Masters grade level60%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 reporting
Meets grade level66%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 reporting
Masters grade level39%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (287 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
243
Economically disadvantaged
96.3%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
50.6%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.2%−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.4%−20.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Friends for Life MS
African American 0.4%
Hispanic 96.7%
White 1.6%
Asian 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting for every category shown · 287 in full cohort
African American 17.8%
Hispanic 76.1%
White 3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 194 reporting for every category shown · 194 in full cohort
African American 21.2%
Hispanic 58.9%
White 12.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
243
Economically disadvantaged students
234
Emergent bilingual students
123
Special education students
15
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
235
TEA-published mobility rate
8.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 243 students in 2025–26, an increase of 17 (7.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
243
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+17
Increase · +7.5%
Change since 2022–23
+67
Increase · +38.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
243
Selected comparison
505.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Friends for Life MS
School year
Students enrolledFriends for Life MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23
176
First available year
492.6
2023–24
210
Increase of 34 (19.3%)
504.1
2024–25
226
Increase of 16 (7.6%)
505.1
2025–26
243
Increase of 17 (7.5%)
505.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14
6.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
16
6.84 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
234
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.0%
Selected comparison
11.1%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 rated charter campuses reporting
−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
6.84
Selected comparison
19.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 rated charter campuses reporting
−12.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Friends for Life MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23
180
Suppressed
—
10
5.56
—
19.5
2023–24
210
16
7.6%
17
8.10
11.2%
19.2
2024–25
234
14
6.0%
16
6.84
11.1%
19.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Friends for Life MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
14
6.0%
16
6.84
11.1%
19.1
In-school suspensions
12
5.1%
13
5.56
7.7%
11.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Friends for Life MS
Parent district: Amigos Por Vida-Friends for Life Pub Chtr Sch
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$5,676
Selected comparison
$12,138
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 rated charter campuses reporting
−$6,462 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $5,676 per student for this campus, $14,495 per student for its parent district, Amigos Por Vida-Friends for Life Pub Chtr Sch, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Friends for Life MS
Parent district: Amigos Por Vida-Friends for Life Pub Chtr Sch
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2023
$6,346
$13,993
$16,792
$11,631
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$6,957
$13,471
$18,125
$11,550
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$5,676
$14,495
$18,972
$12,138
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 284 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$73,291+$9,130 vs similar economic context
Teachers
13−15.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.6+0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Friends for Life MS
Beginning 2.3%
1 to 5 years 42%
6 to 10 years 30.5%
11 to 20 years 25.2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 reporting for every category shown · 287 in full cohort
Beginning 13.4%
1 to 5 years 47.5%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 14.6%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 194 reporting for every category shown · 194 in full cohort
Beginning 11.8%
1 to 5 years 40.8%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 16.9%
21 to 30 years 5.8%
Over 30 years 1.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 267
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 267 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 287
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 287 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
14 measures
4of 267
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 267 that report this measure
4of 190
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 190 that report this measure
5of 287
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 287 that report this measure
5of 287
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 287 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 285
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 285 that report this measure
5of 190
Attendance
Similar size · of the 190 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 285
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 285 that report this measure
6of 192
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 192 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 183
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 183 that report this measure · tied with 3
7of 285
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 285 that report this measure · tied with 3
8of 287
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 287 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 287
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 287 that report this measure · tied with 3
9of 194
School Progress
Similar size · of the 194 that report this measure · tied with 3
10of 183
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 183 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
15of 287
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 287 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101819002.