Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Frank L Madla Early College HS

New Frontiers Public Schools Inc · San Antonio · 146 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
96/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+13.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 124 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
5 of 124tied with 2 others
A96

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.1 average for 124 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 6 points

82 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 14.1 points above the 73.9 average among 116 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Top placement

Earned college credit for a dual credit course

100% 1st of 53 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Top placement

Earned an associate degree

63.4% 1st of 53 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Frank L Madla Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 124 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 5th of 124 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageFrank L Madla Early College HS 9694949596 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9682.1 124 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9583.0 120 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9480.7 114 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9482.0 110 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9683.7 101 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement96 A+14.8 vs similar economic context · 124 reporting
  • School Progress96 A+14.6 vs similar economic context · 124 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps97 A+17.2 vs similar economic context · 121 reporting
  • Academic Growth88 B+14.1 vs similar economic context · 116 reporting
  • Relative Performance96 A+16.0 vs similar economic context · 123 reporting
  • Frank L Madla Early College HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (124 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement96A—
School Progress96A—
Closing the Gaps97A—
Academic Growth88B2
Relative Performance96A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 119 reporting
  • Meets grade level81%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 119 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 119 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (124 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+31.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
98.0%+35.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+41.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+14.2 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%85.8%+14.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course61.0%74.7%−13.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA61.0%32.9%+28.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)7.3%14.4%−7.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course100.0%23.1%+76.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%13.0%−13.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.6%−0.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree63.4%3.5%+59.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.4%−3.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.6%−2.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%8.4%−8.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.9%2.1%+2.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
47

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
37

78.7% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
10

21.3% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
47
Selected comparison
66.2

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
37
Selected comparison
28.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
78.7%
Selected comparison
39.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter campuses reporting

+39.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
21.3%
Selected comparison
55.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter campuses reporting

−33.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.8%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter campuses reporting

−5.8 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TEXAS A&M UNIV-SAN ANTONIO (042485)17
  2. TEXAS A&M UNIV-CORPUS CHRISTI (011161)5
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
146
Economically disadvantaged
57.5%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.2%−15.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.5%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.1%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.6%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Frank L Madla Early College HS

African American: 1.4%Hispanic: 95.9%White: 2.1%Asian: 0.7%
  • African American 1.4%
  • Hispanic 95.9%
  • White 2.1%
  • Asian 0.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting for every category shown · 124 in full cohort

African American: 21.8%Hispanic: 49.2%White: 17.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 7.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 21.8%
  • Hispanic 49.2%
  • White 17.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 7.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
146
Economically disadvantaged students
84
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
11

Early college pathways

Early College High School
146

TEA-published share: 100%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
160
TEA-published mobility rate
10.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 146 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (2.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
146

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−4

Decrease · −2.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
146
Selected comparison
521.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Frank L Madla Early College HS
School yearStudents enrolledFrank L Madla Early College HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 149 First available year 455.2
2022–23 Not reported Not available —
2023–24 179 No adjacent prior year 500.8
2024–25 150 Decrease of 29 (16.2%) 506.7
2025–26 146 Decrease of 4 (2.7%) 521.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
160

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Frank L Madla Early College HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 171 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 157 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 171 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 203 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 160 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Frank L Madla Early College HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$18k$31k20182020202220242025
  • Frank L Madla Early College HS
  • Parent district: New Frontiers Public Schools Inc
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,696
Selected comparison
$11,241

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 119 rated charter campuses reporting

−$3,545 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,696 per student for this campus, $20,074 per student for its parent district, New Frontiers Public Schools Inc, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFrank L Madla Early College HSParent district: New Frontiers Public Schools IncTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,816$10,435$13,054$7,837 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$6,723$11,277$13,108$8,400 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$6,306$11,800$14,058$8,689 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 94 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$6,894$13,039$14,797$9,379 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$11,995$25,728$15,708$10,753 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$10,122$29,902$16,792$11,058 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,659$22,437$18,125$11,172 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 113 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$7,696$20,074$18,972$11,241 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 119 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,807+$2,351 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−25.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
30.6+12.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Frank L Madla Early College HS

Beginning: 12.5%1 to 5 years: 25%6 to 10 years: 39.6%11 to 20 years: 10.4%21 to 30 years: 12.5%
  • Beginning 12.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 25%
  • 6 to 10 years 39.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 10.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.5%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 reporting for every category shown · 124 in full cohort

Beginning: 15.3%1 to 5 years: 40.3%6 to 10 years: 20.9%11 to 20 years: 16.7%21 to 30 years: 5.4%Over 30 years: 1.3%
  • Beginning 15.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 40.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.4%
  • Over 30 years 1.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Frank L Madla Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFrank L Madla Early College HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English17.116.3
Secondary languages other than English1715.1
Secondary math12.216.6
Secondary science18.117.4
Secondary social studies16.317.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

4 measures

  • 1of 331

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Texas charter average · of the 331 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 1of 164

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 164 that report this measure

  • 1of 124

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 124 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 53

    Earned an associate degree

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 53 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 160

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar size · of the 160 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 163

    Relative Performance

    Similar size · of the 163 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 4of 124

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 124 that report this measure

  • 4of 82

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 82 that report this measure

  • 4of 82

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 82 that report this measure

  • 5of 124

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 124 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 124

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 124 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 123

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 123 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 119

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 119 that report this measure

  • 5of 94

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar size · of the 94 that report this measure

  • 6of 164

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 164 that report this measure

  • 7of 164

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 53

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 53 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 82

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 82 that report this measure

  • 9of 20

    Five-Year Graduation Rate

    Similar size (standard accountability only) · of the 20 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015805001.