Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Founders Classical Academy of Prosper

Texas College Preparatory Academies · Prosper · 953 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+1.0 ptsvs 88 average · 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
33 of 60tied with 3 others
B89

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

88 +2.5 pts vs 85.5

  • 88 is 2.5 points above the 85.5 average among 57 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

5.2% −4.1 pts vs 9.3%

  • 5.2% is 4.1 percentage points lower than the 9.3% average among 52 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

96.6% +1.1 pts vs 95.5%

  • 96.6% is 1.1 percentage points above the 95.5% average among 52 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Founders Classical Academy of Prosper is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 33rd of 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageFounders Classical Academy of Prosper 8688899189 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8988.0 60 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9189.3 48 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24B8988.9 48 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23B8888.0 44 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22B8689.9 38 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+1.5 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
  • School Progress67 D−14.8 vs similar economic context · 58 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps88 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 57 reporting
  • Academic Growth67 D−13.6 vs similar economic context · 57 reporting
  • Relative Performance62 D−10.3 vs similar economic context · 58 reporting
  • Founders Classical Academy of Prosper
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress67D3
Closing the Gaps88B2
Academic Growth67D3
Relative Performance62D8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (67) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
  • Masters grade level40%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−72.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−55.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−51.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
5.8%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
953
Economically disadvantaged
8.9%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.5%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.8%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.2%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Founders Classical Academy of Prosper

African American: 13.7%Hispanic: 14.9%White: 36.6%American Indian: 1%Asian: 30.4%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 13.7%
  • Hispanic 14.9%
  • White 36.6%
  • American Indian 1%
  • Asian 30.4%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort

African American: 8.8%Hispanic: 21%White: 31.2%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 32.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 8.8%
  • Hispanic 21%
  • White 31.2%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 32.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
953
Economically disadvantaged students
85
Emergent bilingual students
81
Special education students
103

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
92
Students in TEA mobility denominator
888
TEA-published mobility rate
10.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 953 students in 2025–26, an increase of 24 (2.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
953

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+24

Increase · +2.6%

Change since 2021–22
+315

Increase · +49.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
953
Selected comparison
631

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Founders Classical Academy of Prosper
School yearStudents enrolledFounders Classical Academy of ProsperChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 638 First available year 682.8
2022–23 768 Increase of 130 (20.4%) 644.9
2023–24 882 Increase of 114 (14.8%) 648.6
2024–25 929 Increase of 47 (5.3%) 649.5
2025–26 953 Increase of 24 (2.6%) 631

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
56

5.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
127

13.12 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
968

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.8%
Selected comparison
5.1%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting

+0.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
13.12
Selected comparison
8.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting

+4.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Founders Classical Academy of Prosper
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2021–22 731 Suppressed — 11 1.50 — 6.4
2022–23 823 33 4.0% 54 6.56 4.4% 7
2023–24 938 58 6.2% 95 10.13 4.8% 8.1
2024–25 968 56 5.8% 127 13.12 5.1% 8.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Founders Classical Academy of Prosper in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 56 5.8% 127 13.12 5.1% 8.4
In-school suspensions 50 5.2% 86 8.88 4.3% 5.9
Out-of-school suspensions 24 2.5% 40 4.13 3.4% 5.3
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k202220242025
  • Founders Classical Academy of Prosper
  • Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,448
Selected comparison
$10,823

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting

−$1,375 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,448 per student for this campus, $11,086 per student for its parent district, Texas College Preparatory Academies, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFounders Classical Academy of ProsperParent district: Texas College Preparatory AcademiesTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2022$7,680$9,545$15,708$9,036 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$8,283$10,993$16,792$9,878 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,801$11,083$18,125$10,220 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$9,448$11,086$18,972$10,823 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$56,771−$6,050 vs similar economic context
Teachers
56+20.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.9−0.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Founders Classical Academy of Prosper

Beginning: 21.8%1 to 5 years: 72.9%6 to 10 years: 5.3%
  • Beginning 21.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 72.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 5.3%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.1%1 to 5 years: 28.1%6 to 10 years: 13.1%11 to 20 years: 15.4%21 to 30 years: 6.8%Over 30 years: 1.2%
  • Beginning 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.8%
  • Over 30 years 1.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Founders Classical Academy of Prosper in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFounders Classical Academy of Prosper · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2020.9
Grade 127.321.4
Grade 22721.9
Grade 32722.7
Grade 426.822.9
Grade 52721.6
Grade 622.322
Secondary English14.917.8
Secondary languages other than English16.817
Secondary math1815.8
Secondary science1819.3
Secondary social studies15.918.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 9of 52

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 52 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 13of 316

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 316 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221801077.