Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville

Texas College Preparatory Academies · Lewisville · 902 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 63 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
8 of 63tied with 2 others
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.5 average for 63 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 3 points

84 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 10 points above the 77 average among 60 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Top placement

Social Studies — Masters

54% 2nd of 45 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Top placement

Social Studies — Meets

82% 3rd of 45 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.5 average for 63 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 8th of 63 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageFounders Classical Academy - Lewisville 9094949293 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9382.5 63 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9284.3 58 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9483.8 58 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9485.4 56 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9086.9 49 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+9.1 vs similar economic context · 63 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+10.0 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+15.0 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
  • Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (63 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance87B3

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level94%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 reporting
  • Masters grade level54%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (63 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.9%+41.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+43.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+48.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
87.0%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria87.0%85.4%+1.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 26 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course78.9%73.1%+5.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA78.9%58.1%+20.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)45.1%12.8%+32.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course67.6%43.7%+23.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.0%+0.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%11.7%−11.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.0%−3.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%0.1%−0.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.2%3.6%+0.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.2%1.6%+2.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 28 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
71

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
36

50.7% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
26

36.6% of graduates

Not trackable
9

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
71
Selected comparison
56.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
36
Selected comparison
27.9

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
50.7%
Selected comparison
49.4%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter campuses reporting

+1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
36.6%
Selected comparison
45.1%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter campuses reporting

−8.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
12.7%
Selected comparison
5.5%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter campuses reporting

+7.2 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)7
  2. DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY (003560)5
  3. NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE (003558)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
902
Economically disadvantaged
24.8%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.3%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.9%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.7%−6.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville

African American: 7.2%Hispanic: 22.7%White: 34.9%Asian: 28.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 6.4%
  • African American 7.2%
  • Hispanic 22.7%
  • White 34.9%
  • Asian 28.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 6.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 34.8%White: 38.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 11.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.4%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 34.8%
  • White 38.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 11.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
902
Economically disadvantaged students
224
Emergent bilingual students
129
Special education students
80

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
75
Students in TEA mobility denominator
899
TEA-published mobility rate
8.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 902 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (1.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
902

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−10

Decrease · −1.1%

Change since 2021–22
−30

Decrease · −3.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
902
Selected comparison
533.1

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville
School yearStudents enrolledFounders Classical Academy - LewisvilleChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 932 First available year 414.2
2022–23 934 Increase of 2 (0.2%) 449.5
2023–24 923 Decrease of 11 (1.2%) 500.3
2024–25 912 Decrease of 11 (1.2%) 511.5
2025–26 902 Decrease of 10 (1.1%) 533.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
42

4.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
77

8.10 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
951

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.4%
Selected comparison
7.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting

−2.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.1
Selected comparison
11.1

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting

−3.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 964 14 1.4% 18 1.87 3.2% 4.2
2021–22 992 41 4.1% 58 5.85 7.6% 10.5
2022–23 975 39 4.0% 53 5.44 7.5% 12.3
2023–24 953 52 5.5% 109 11.44 6.7% 11.5
2024–25 951 42 4.4% 77 8.10 7.2% 11.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 42 4.4% 77 8.10 7.2% 11.1
In-school suspensions 29 3.0% 40 4.21 5.2% 6.8
Out-of-school suspensions 18 1.9% 36 3.79 4.7% 7.2
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville
  • Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,072
Selected comparison
$10,313

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting

−$241 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,072 per student for this campus, $11,086 per student for its parent district, Texas College Preparatory Academies, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFounders Classical Academy - LewisvilleParent district: Texas College Preparatory AcademiesTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,632$7,842$13,054$6,870 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$7,458$8,903$13,108$7,211 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$7,539$9,540$14,058$7,606 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$7,847$9,610$14,797$8,384 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$8,105$9,545$15,708$9,015 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$9,022$10,993$16,792$9,950 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$9,642$11,083$18,125$9,960 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$10,072$11,086$18,972$10,313 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$58,077+$1,193 vs similar economic context
Teachers
58+24.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5−17.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville

1 to 5 years: 44.2%6 to 10 years: 37.9%11 to 20 years: 17.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 44.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 37.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort

Beginning: 12.2%1 to 5 years: 42.7%6 to 10 years: 21.5%11 to 20 years: 14.3%21 to 30 years: 5.5%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 12.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 42.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.5%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Founders Classical Academy - Lewisville in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFounders Classical Academy - Lewisville · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1820.5
Grade 12121.4
Grade 221.721.4
Grade 32223
Grade 421.322.9
Grade 52422.7
Grade 626.421.1
Secondary English18.415.2
Secondary languages other than English1716.6
Secondary math18.414.5
Secondary science20.917.3
Secondary social studies23.716.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

4 measures

  • 2of 45

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 3of 62

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 45

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 3of 45

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 45 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 4of 63

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 63 that report this measure

  • 4of 28

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 5of 63

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 63 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 62

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure

  • 5of 62

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 28

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 7of 60

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 60

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 60 that report this measure

  • 7of 28

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 8of 63

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 63 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 60

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 60

    Science — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 131

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar size · of the 131 that report this measure

  • 10of 60

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 34

    Four-Year Graduation Rate

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate (standard accountability only) · of the 34 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221801043.