Recent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Forney HS
Kaufman County · Region 10: Richardson · 2,813 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 87/1002025-26
- Change
- +5 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +0.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 1,131 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 581 of 1,131tied with 67 others
- Score vs region
- +4.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 432 of 1,157tied with 51 others
- Score vs county
- +9.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 62 rated schools in Kaufman County
- Kaufman County placement
- 14 of 62tied with 2 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +0.3 ptsvs 86.7 average · 406 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 212 of 406tied with 14 others
- Score vs state
- +5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.4 average for 1,131 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.The current score is level with the 86.7 average for 406 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 10 points
62 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 68%vs 60.9% avg · +7.1 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 32.6% avg · +2.4 pts
Among 1,016 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 4.8 points above the 82.2 average among 1,157 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 10 points
62 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above Region 10: Richardson averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 68%vs 46.8% avg · +21.2 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 23.6% avg · +11.4 pts
Among 1,037 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 9.4 points above the 77.6 average among 62 schools in Kaufman County reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 10 points
62 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
19.9% 1st of 13 schools in Kaufman County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 10 points
62 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Student Achievement above the similar-size average
88 +3.4 pts vs 84.6
- 88 is 3.4 points above the 84.6 average among 406 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 5.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 10 points
62 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 68%vs 47.1% avg · +20.9 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 22.8% avg · +12.2 pts
Among 6,717 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Forney HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 1,131 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 581st of 1,131 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Forney HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 432nd of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 51 others).
Forney HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 62 rated schools in Kaufman County (tied with 2 others).
Forney HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 86.7 average for 406 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 212th of 406 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 14 others).
Forney HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,456th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 307 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 87 | 86.4 1,131 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 85 | 86.3 1,107 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 84 | 84.9 1,091 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 85 | 85.2 1,078 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 82 | 86.7 1,062 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Forney HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,131 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 88 | B | 2 |
| School Progress | 86 | B | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 83 | B | 7 |
| Academic Growth | 72 | C | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 86 | B | 4 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,131 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 97.9%+4.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 327 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 95.3%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 326 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 95.4%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 327 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.5%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 327 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 99.0%+9.9 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 99.0% | 89.1% | +9.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 83.7% | 62.9% | +20.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 31.2% | 39.9% | −8.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 19.9% | 17.7% | +2.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 34.8% | 38.1% | −3.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 36.1% | 35.9% | +0.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 2.9% | 0.9% | +2.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 5.9% | 4.5% | +1.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.2% | 6.2% | −6.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 2.9% | 2.6% | +0.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 6.1% | 6.9% | −0.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 2.5% | 3.3% | −0.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 463
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 212
45.8% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 241
52.1% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 10
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 463
- Selected comparison
- 271.6
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 212
- Selected comparison
- 131.2
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 45.8%
- Selected comparison
- 49.2%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 52.1%
- Selected comparison
- 45.4%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 2.2%
- Selected comparison
- 5.4%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- DALLAS COLLEGE DISTRICT (009331)49
- TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)16
- TRINITY VALLEY COMM COLLEGE (003572)16
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 2,813
- Economically disadvantaged
- 33.6%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 10.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 13.2%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 92.6%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 24.3%+12.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Forney HS
- African American 30.1%
- Hispanic 30.8%
- White 33.4%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,131 reporting for every category shown · 1,131 in full cohort
- African American 9%
- Hispanic 31.6%
- White 47.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 6.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
- African American 24.7%
- Hispanic 39.8%
- White 29.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 406 reporting for every category shown · 406 in full cohort
- African American 14.1%
- Hispanic 51.9%
- White 23%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 7.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 2,813
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 944
- Emergent bilingual students
- 280
- Special education students
- 371
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 389
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 2,777
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 14%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 2,813 students in 2025–26, an increase of 231 (8.9%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 2,813
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +231
Increase · +8.9%
- Change since 2021–22
- +805
Increase · +40.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 2,813
- Selected comparison
- 765.1
| School year | Students enrolledForney HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 2,008 | First available year | 775.8 |
| 2022–23 | 2,272 | Increase of 264 (13.1%) | 778 |
| 2023–24 | 2,351 | Increase of 79 (3.5%) | 776.3 |
| 2024–25 | 2,582 | Increase of 231 (9.8%) | 772.1 |
| 2025–26 | 2,813 | Increase of 231 (8.9%) | 765.1 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 420
15.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 1,496
56.14 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 2,665
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 15.8%
- Selected comparison
- 9.7%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 56.14
- Selected comparison
- 20.4
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 1,831 | 106 | 5.8% | 215 | 11.74 | 7.9% | 14.6 |
| 2021–22 | 2,151 | 295 | 13.7% | 913 | 42.45 | 10.0% | 20.7 |
| 2022–23 | 2,403 | 402 | 16.7% | 1,111 | 46.23 | 10.3% | 21.8 |
| 2023–24 | 2,430 | 448 | 18.4% | 1,281 | 52.72 | 10.0% | 21.9 |
| 2024–25 | 2,665 | 420 | 15.8% | 1,496 | 56.14 | 9.7% | 20.4 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 420 | 15.8% | 1,496 | 56.14 | 9.7% | 20.4 |
| In-school suspensions | 385 | 14.4% | 974 | 36.55 | 8.7% | 15.8 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 205 | 7.7% | 393 | 14.75 | 4.8% | 6.6 |
| DAEP placements | 107 | 4.0% | 128 | 4.80 | 3.5% | 4.1 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | 79 | 3.0% | 94 | 3.53 | 2.7% | 3.1 |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | 32 | 1.2% | 34 | 1.28 | 1.8% | 2.1 |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Forney HS
- Parent district: Forney ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $9,628
- Selected comparison
- $11,863
For 2025, TEA reported $9,628 per student for this campus, $19,790 per student for its parent district, Forney ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Forney HS | Parent district: Forney ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,605 | $9,960 | $13,054 | $7,630 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,007 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,630 | $12,041 | $13,108 | $7,750 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,021 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,228 | $13,290 | $14,058 | $8,099 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,029 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $7,148 | $20,660 | $14,797 | $8,549 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,041 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $11,694 | $21,445 | $15,708 | $9,804 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,061 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $21,170 | $28,149 | $16,792 | $10,388 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,079 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $23,908 | $32,204 | $18,125 | $11,395 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,628 | $19,790 | $18,972 | $11,863 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,107 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $69,662+$1,686 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 166+115.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 17+2.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Forney HS
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 31.7%
- 6 to 10 years 16.9%
- 11 to 20 years 29.2%
- 21 to 30 years 14.7%
- Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,131 reporting for every category shown · 1,131 in full cohort
- Beginning 5%
- 1 to 5 years 22.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 31.9%
- 21 to 30 years 17.3%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.2%
- 1 to 5 years 34%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 21.9%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 406 reporting for every category shown · 406 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.7%
- 6 to 10 years 20.3%
- 11 to 20 years 30%
- 21 to 30 years 15.2%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classForney HS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 16.4 | 16.5 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 23.2 | 18.4 |
| Secondary math | 15.9 | 17.3 |
| Secondary science | 15.4 | 18.7 |
| Secondary social studies | 15.4 | 18.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 196 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 13
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
1of 13
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
7 measures
-
2of 41
Science — Masters
Kaufman County · of the 41 that report this measure
-
2of 24
Social Studies — Masters
Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 13
College, career or military ready
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
3of 41
Science — Meets
Kaufman County · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 13
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Earned an associate degree
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
11 measures
-
4of 24
Social Studies — Approaches
Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 13
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
4of 13
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
5of 24
Social Studies — Meets
Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure
-
5of 13
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
5of 13
Earned an industry-based certification
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
6of 41
Science — Approaches
Kaufman County · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 13
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 59
Student Achievement
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 59
All Subjects — Approaches
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 13
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129902001.