−1.0 ptsvs 82 average · 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
946 of 1,706tied with 65 others
Score vs region
+1.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
258 of 519tied with 17 others
Score vs county
−2.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 164 rated schools in Williamson County
Williamson County placement
95 of 164tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+0.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,884 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,441 of 2,884tied with 103 others
Score vs state
−0.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,141 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B81
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82 average for 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is below the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 2,884 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 53.1% avg · +1.9 pts
Masters
27%vs 23.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Among 1,643 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Forest North Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82 average for 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 946th of 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).
Forest North Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 258th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 17 others).
Forest North Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 95th of 164 rated schools in Williamson County (tied with 5 others).
Forest North Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 2,884 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,441st of 2,884 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 103 others).
Forest North Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement79 C−2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,643 reporting
School Progress82 B+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,638 reporting
Closing the Gaps77 C−2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,623 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,603 reporting
Relative Performance79 C−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,638 reporting
Forest North Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,706 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
79
C
1
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
77
C
3
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
79
C
1
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so
Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level75%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 reporting
Meets grade level55%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 reporting
Masters grade level27%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
Meets grade level62%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
Masters grade level34%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 reporting
Meets grade level58%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 reporting
Masters grade level26%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level65%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,516 reporting
Meets grade level28%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,516 reporting
Masters grade level7%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,516 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,706 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
310
Economically disadvantaged
50.3%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.1%+6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
29.3%+10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.0%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
26.1%+11.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Forest North Elem
African American 17.1%
Hispanic 38.8%
White 27.6%
Asian 8.9%
Two or More Races 7.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting for every category shown · 1,706 in full cohort
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 41.1%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
African American 7.1%
Hispanic 37%
White 35.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 13.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,884 reporting for every category shown · 2,884 in full cohort
African American 11%
Hispanic 53.2%
White 30%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
304
Economically disadvantaged students
153
Emergent bilingual students
61
Special education students
89
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
73
Students in TEA mobility denominator
269
TEA-published mobility rate
27.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 310 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (2.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
310
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−9
Decrease · −2.8%
Change since 2021–22
+68
Increase · +28.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
310
Selected comparison
646.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Forest North Elem
School year
Students enrolledForest North Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
242
First available year
650.2
2022–23
272
Increase of 30 (12.4%)
654.6
2023–24
266
Decrease of 6 (2.2%)
654.1
2024–25
319
Increase of 53 (19.9%)
650.1
2025–26
310
Decrease of 9 (2.8%)
646.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
373
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Forest North Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
359
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
325
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
322
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
293
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
373
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Forest North Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Forest North Elem
Parent district: Round Rock ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,907
Selected comparison
$11,981
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,680 rated schools reporting
+$1,926 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,907 per student for this campus, $16,516 per student for its parent district, Round Rock ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Forest North Elem
Parent district: Round Rock ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$11,172
$12,357
$13,054
$7,831
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,496
$11,300
$13,108
$8,012
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,575 rated schools reporting
2020
$10,367
$12,713
$14,058
$8,540
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting
2021
$13,423
$15,241
$14,797
$8,950
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,603 rated schools reporting
2022
$17,776
$15,983
$15,708
$10,235
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,613 rated schools reporting
2023
$16,788
$14,746
$16,792
$10,696
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 rated schools reporting
2024
$16,736
$15,268
$18,125
$11,516
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,907
$16,516
$18,972
$11,981
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,680 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,920−$949 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−13.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.7−9.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Forest North Elem
Beginning 3.5%
1 to 5 years 17.5%
6 to 10 years 21.1%
11 to 20 years 45.6%
21 to 30 years 10.5%
Over 30 years 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting for every category shown · 1,706 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.4%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,884 reporting for every category shown · 2,884 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.1%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Forest North Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classForest North Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22.5
18
Grade 1
20
18.4
Grade 2
23.4
18.6
Grade 3
17.6
19.1
Grade 4
17
19.1
Grade 5
16.6
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246909108.