Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Finley JH

Ellis County · Region 10: Richardson · 846 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
74/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−8.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,677 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,355 of 1,677tied with 59 others
C74

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,677 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Finley JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,677 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,355th of 1,677 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 59 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
18.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageFinley JH 8082727574 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7482.2 1,677 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7582.5 1,650 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7280.5 1,624 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8281.1 1,604 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8083.6 1,582 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement74 C−8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,621 reporting
  • School Progress73 C−8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,616 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps73 C−6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,602 reporting
  • Academic Growth73 C−2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,588 reporting
  • Relative Performance66 D−13.3 vs similar economic context · 1,616 reporting
  • Finley JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,677 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement74C6
School Progress73C7
Closing the Gaps73C7
Academic Growth73C7
Relative Performance66D4

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (74), so School Progress (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 74.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,613 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,613 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,613 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,501 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,501 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,501 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level44%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
  • Meets grade level15%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,677 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
846
Economically disadvantaged
49.1%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.0%−4.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.8%+5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.3%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.0%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Finley JH

African American: 15.7%Hispanic: 43.6%White: 33.4%Asian: 0.9%Two or More Races: 6.4%
  • African American 15.7%
  • Hispanic 43.6%
  • White 33.4%
  • Asian 0.9%
  • Two or More Races 6.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 reporting for every category shown · 1,677 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 40.2%White: 42.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 40.2%
  • White 42.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
845
Economically disadvantaged students
415
Emergent bilingual students
68
Special education students
201

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
98
Students in TEA mobility denominator
898
TEA-published mobility rate
10.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 846 students in 2025–26, an increase of 7 (0.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
846

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+7

Increase · +0.8%

Change since 2021–22
+30

Increase · +3.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
846
Selected comparison
651.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,640 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Finley JH
School yearStudents enrolledFinley JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 816 First available year 652.3
2022–23 816 No change 657.2
2023–24 838 Increase of 22 (2.7%) 656.8
2024–25 839 Increase of 1 (0.1%) 653.5
2025–26 846 Increase of 7 (0.8%) 651.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
117

13.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
270

30.72 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
879

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
13.3%
Selected comparison
12.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,298 rated schools reporting

+1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
30.72
Selected comparison
26.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,395 rated schools reporting

+4.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Finley JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 835 79 9.5% 157 18.80 9.5% 18.1
2021–22 873 111 12.7% 221 25.32 11.8% 25.8
2022–23 874 94 10.8% 162 18.54 12.3% 27.6
2023–24 905 83 9.2% 142 15.69 12.2% 28.1
2024–25 879 117 13.3% 270 30.72 12.0% 26.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Finley JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 117 13.3% 270 30.72 12.0% 26.5
In-school suspensions 97 11.0% 154 17.52 10.8% 20.4
Out-of-school suspensions 34 3.9% 69 7.85 6.0% 8.4
DAEP placements 33 3.8% 38 4.32 4.4% 5.2
Mandatory DAEP placements 14 1.6% 15 1.71 3.3% 3.8
Discretionary DAEP placements 21 2.4% 23 2.62 2.5% 2.9
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$19k$32k20182020202220242025
  • Finley JH
  • Parent district: Waxahachie ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$27,981
Selected comparison
$12,009

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 rated schools reporting

+$15,972 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $27,981 per student for this campus, $30,656 per student for its parent district, Waxahachie ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFinley JHParent district: Waxahachie ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,361$18,383$13,054$7,857 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,523 rated schools reporting
2019$8,086$13,267$13,108$8,042 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 rated schools reporting
2020$8,202$14,742$14,058$8,529 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting
2021$7,564$13,446$14,797$8,925 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,573 rated schools reporting
2022$7,512$14,459$15,708$10,240 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,584 rated schools reporting
2023$8,682$14,212$16,792$10,705 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,603 rated schools reporting
2024$11,337$24,809$18,125$11,551 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 rated schools reporting
2025$27,981$30,656$18,972$12,009 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,523−$2,471 vs similar economic context
Teachers
59+16.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−5.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Finley JH

Beginning: 11.1%1 to 5 years: 30.2%6 to 10 years: 11.8%11 to 20 years: 30.9%21 to 30 years: 11.6%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 11.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 11.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.6%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 reporting for every category shown · 1,677 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.7%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Finley JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFinley JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 619.517.7
Secondary English15.915.1
Secondary languages other than English25.317.4
Secondary math18.816
Secondary science2117.5
Secondary social studies2117.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 4of 63

    Per-student spending

    Ellis County · of the 63 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 070912042.