Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Farias ElemA99vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Farias Elem
Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 566 students
Current score
99/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+21.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,225 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 1,225tied with 2 others
Score vs region
+13.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
2 of 505tied with 4 others
Score vs county
+10.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
2 of 76among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+18.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,745 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
3 of 4,745tied with 24 others
Score vs state
+17.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5 of 7,646tied with 29 others
A99
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 99 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,225 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 4,745 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
93 to 992024-25 to 2025-26
99 is 21.2 points above
the 77.8 average among 1,225 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 1,225 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 3 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Farias Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,225 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 1,225 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
Farias Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 4 others).
Farias Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 76 rated schools in Webb County.
Farias Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 4,745 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 4,745 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 24 others).
Farias Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+26.2 vs similar economic context · 1,136 reporting
School Progress99 A+20.1 vs similar economic context · 1,135 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+24.6 vs similar economic context · 1,128 reporting
Academic Growth99 A+25.3 vs similar economic context · 1,120 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+19.4 vs similar economic context · 1,134 reporting
Farias Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,225 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
99
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
99
A
—
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (99), so
Student Achievement (96) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 99.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,136 reporting
Meets grade level90%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,136 reporting
Masters grade level58%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,136 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,136 reporting
Meets grade level91%+48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,136 reporting
Masters grade level56%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,136 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,135 reporting
Meets grade level89%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,135 reporting
Masters grade level57%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,135 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting
Meets grade level94%+61 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting
Masters grade level65%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,225 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
566
Economically disadvantaged
99.8%+5.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
37.3%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.0%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.6%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.9%−17.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Farias Elem
Hispanic 98.4%
White 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,225 reporting for every category shown · 1,225 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 77.8%
White 4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,745 reporting for every category shown · 4,745 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
566
Economically disadvantaged students
565
Emergent bilingual students
211
Special education students
79
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
56
Students in TEA mobility denominator
457
TEA-published mobility rate
12.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 566 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 31 (5.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
566
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−31
Decrease · −5.2%
Change since 2021–22
+46
Increase · +8.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
566
Selected comparison
542.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,211 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Farias Elem
School year
Students enrolledFarias Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
520
First available year
594.7
2022–23
563
Increase of 43 (8.3%)
588.3
2023–24
638
Increase of 75 (13.3%)
578.4
2024–25
597
Decrease of 41 (6.4%)
571.7
2025–26
566
Decrease of 31 (5.2%)
542.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
614
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Farias Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
658
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
585
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
603
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
670
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
614
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Farias Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Farias Elem
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,142
Selected comparison
$13,676
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,210 rated schools reporting
−$3,534 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,142 per student for this campus, $17,272 per student for its parent district, Laredo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Farias Elem
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,554
$12,618
$13,054
$8,432
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,675
$12,937
$13,108
$8,366
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,172 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,404
$13,776
$14,058
$8,872
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,175 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,718
$15,445
$14,797
$9,799
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,175 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,914
$19,935
$15,708
$11,187
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,187 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,806
$18,022
$16,792
$11,864
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,197 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,440
$18,312
$18,125
$12,974
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,203 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,142
$17,272
$18,972
$13,676
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,210 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,533−$5,321 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−2.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.8+0.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Farias Elem
Beginning 2.8%
1 to 5 years 19.6%
6 to 10 years 16.8%
11 to 20 years 43.6%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,225 reporting for every category shown · 1,225 in full cohort
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 26.8%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,745 reporting for every category shown · 4,745 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Farias Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classFarias Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22.6
18.2
Grade 1
18.6
18.2
Grade 2
19.7
18.2
Grade 3
17
18.2
Grade 4
20.7
18.1
Grade 5
21.8
18.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
4 measures
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 1,136
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,136 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 76
Reading — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 76
Math — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
12 measures
2of 4,551
School Progress
Similar size · of the 4,551 that report this measure · tied with 3
2of 4,502
Academic Growth
Similar size · of the 4,502 that report this measure
2of 1,225
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,225 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 1,135
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,135 that report this measure
2of 492
All Subjects — Meets
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure · tied with 3
2of 76
Student Achievement
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
2of 76
Relative Performance
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 76
Reading — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
2of 76
Attendance
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 1,136
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,136 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 76
All Subjects — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
3of 76
Science — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 76
Science — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
9of 76
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
10of 1,135
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,135 that report this measure · tied with 4
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
25of 1,081
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,081 that report this measure · tied with 9
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240901105.