+3.3 ptsvs 78.7 average · 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
796 of 2,084tied with 90 others
Score vs region
+3.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
Region 12: Waco placement
114 of 301tied with 14 others
Score vs county
+0.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 19 rated schools in Coryell County
Coryell County placement
10 of 19tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+1.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,604 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,075 of 4,604tied with 186 others
Score vs state
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.7 average for 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 19 rated schools in Coryell County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,604 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
52%vs 44.7% avg · +7.3 pts
Masters
25%vs 17.7% avg · +7.3 pts
Among 1,949 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.7 average for 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 796th of 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 114th of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 14 others).
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 19 rated schools in Coryell County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 19 rated schools in Coryell County (tied with 1 other).
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,604 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,075th of 4,604 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 186 others).
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement78 C+3.2 vs similar economic context · 1,949 reporting
School Progress85 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C+0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,928 reporting
Academic Growth79 C+6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,882 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,084 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
78
C
2
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
79
C
1
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level77%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
Meets grade level52%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
Masters grade level25%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Meets grade level64%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Masters grade level34%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Meets grade level44%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level73%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 reporting
Meets grade level42%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 reporting
Masters grade level16%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,084 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
477
Economically disadvantaged
73.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.1%−19.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
39.0%+20.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.9%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 31%
White 33.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 1.7%
Two or More Races 14.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 reporting for every category shown · 2,084 in full cohort
African American 12.9%
Hispanic 60.6%
White 20.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Coryell County · 19 reporting for every category shown · 19 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 28.9%
White 47.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.9%
Pacific Islander 1.6%
Two or More Races 9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,604 reporting for every category shown · 4,604 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
477
Economically disadvantaged students
352
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
186
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
114
Students in TEA mobility denominator
458
TEA-published mobility rate
24.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 477 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (0.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
477
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+4
Increase · +0.8%
Change since 2021–22
−59
Decrease · −11.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
477
Selected comparison
639.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
School year
Students enrolledFairview/Miss Jewell Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
536
First available year
656.4
2022–23
500
Decrease of 36 (6.7%)
660.4
2023–24
504
Increase of 4 (0.8%)
657.7
2024–25
473
Decrease of 31 (6.2%)
655.4
2025–26
477
Increase of 4 (0.8%)
639.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
12
2.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
21
3.95 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
532
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.3%
Selected comparison
13.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting
−10.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.95
Selected comparison
31.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 rated schools reporting
−27.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
599
39
6.5%
117
19.53
9.2%
18.4
2021–22
593
47
7.9%
165
27.82
13.0%
31
2022–23
574
45
7.8%
175
30.49
13.6%
33.3
2023–24
559
18
3.2%
37
6.62
13.5%
33.1
2024–25
532
12
2.3%
21
3.95
13.2%
31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
12
2.3%
21
3.95
13.2%
31.9
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
12
2.26
—
23.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
Parent district: Copperas Cove ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,628
Selected comparison
$13,185
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting
−$2,557 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,628 per student for this campus, $14,584 per student for its parent district, Copperas Cove ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
Parent district: Copperas Cove ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,042
$10,585
$13,054
$8,051
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,314
$10,385
$13,108
$8,196
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,959 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,093
$10,464
$14,058
$8,749
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,664
$11,597
$14,797
$9,283
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,151
$14,218
$15,708
$10,567
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,012 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,655
$14,886
$16,792
$11,188
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,029 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,752
$13,804
$18,125
$12,335
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,628
$14,584
$18,972
$13,185
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,539−$2,059 vs similar economic context
Teachers
35−8.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.6−0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 37.1%
6 to 10 years 25.7%
11 to 20 years 25.7%
21 to 30 years 8.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 reporting for every category shown · 2,084 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Coryell County · 19 reporting for every category shown · 19 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 31.7%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,604 reporting for every category shown · 4,604 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.1%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Fairview/Miss Jewell Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classFairview/Miss Jewell Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.5
17.9
Grade 1
10.7
18.2
Grade 2
14.9
18.3
Grade 3
13.4
18.6
Grade 4
14.7
18.9
Grade 5
15.3
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 17
Reading — Masters
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 17
All Subjects — Masters
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 17
Reading — Approaches
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 17
Reading — Meets
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
15 measures
4of 17
All Subjects — Approaches
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 17
All Subjects — Meets
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
5of 17
Relative Performance
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 17
Math — Masters
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
7of 17
Math — Approaches
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 16
Science — Approaches
Coryell County · of the 16 that report this measure
8of 17
School Progress
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
8of 17
Math — Meets
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
8of 15
Academic Growth
Coryell County · of the 15 that report this measure
9of 17
Student Achievement
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure
9of 17
Closing the Gaps
Coryell County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 16
Science — Meets
Coryell County · of the 16 that report this measure
10of 19
Overall score
Coryell County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 19
Per-student spending
Coryell County · of the 19 that report this measure
10of 16
Science — Masters
Coryell County · of the 16 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 050910101.