+9.4 ptsvs 79.6 average · 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
331 of 2,023tied with 67 others
Score vs region
+5.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
403 of 1,303tied with 42 others
Score vs county
+3.6 ptsvs 85.4 average · 96 rated schools in Brazoria County
Brazoria County placement
36 of 96tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+8.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,411 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,006 of 4,411tied with 161 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.6 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 85.4 average for 96 rated schools in Brazoria County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,411 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 47.2% avg · +10.8 pts
Masters
25%vs 19.1% avg · +5.9 pts
Among 1,912 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Fairview JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.6 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 331st of 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Fairview JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 403rd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 42 others).
Fairview JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.4 average for 96 rated schools in Brazoria County. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 36th of 96 rated schools in Brazoria County (tied with 1 other).
Fairview JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,411 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,006th of 4,411 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 161 others).
Fairview JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,912 reporting
School Progress91 A+10.4 vs similar economic context · 1,905 reporting
Closing the Gaps84 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,888 reporting
Academic Growth84 B+10.3 vs similar economic context · 1,844 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+12.1 vs similar economic context · 1,905 reporting
Fairview JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
84
B
6
Academic Growth
84
B
6
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so
Student Achievement (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Meets grade level58%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Masters grade level25%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Meets grade level67%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Masters grade level37%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Meets grade level54%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Meets grade level75%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Masters grade level39%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level57%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 908 reporting
Meets grade level23%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 908 reporting
Masters grade level7%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 908 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
679
Economically disadvantaged
67.2%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.5%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.6%+5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Fairview JH
African American 2.1%
Hispanic 53.5%
White 39.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
African American 11.9%
Hispanic 54.1%
White 27.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Brazoria County · 96 reporting for every category shown · 96 in full cohort
African American 16.1%
Hispanic 44.3%
White 28.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,411 reporting for every category shown · 4,411 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
679
Economically disadvantaged students
456
Emergent bilingual students
85
Special education students
167
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
93
Students in TEA mobility denominator
697
TEA-published mobility rate
13.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 679 students in 2025–26, an increase of 35 (5.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
679
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+35
Increase · +5.4%
Change since 2021–22
−272
Decrease · −28.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
679
Selected comparison
640.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,988 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Fairview JH
School year
Students enrolledFairview JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
951
First available year
651.8
2022–23
864
Decrease of 87 (9.1%)
659.3
2023–24
793
Decrease of 71 (8.2%)
658.9
2024–25
644
Decrease of 149 (18.8%)
655.7
2025–26
679
Increase of 35 (5.4%)
640.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
139
20.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
418
61.83 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
676
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
20.6%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,548 rated schools reporting
+7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
61.83
Selected comparison
30.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 rated schools reporting
+31.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Fairview JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
870
152
17.5%
384
44.14
9.6%
19.3
2021–22
1,006
219
21.8%
574
57.06
12.8%
30.2
2022–23
895
233
26.0%
709
79.22
13.4%
32.2
2023–24
839
197
23.5%
665
79.26
13.2%
31.8
2024–25
676
139
20.6%
418
61.83
12.8%
30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Fairview JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
139
20.6%
418
61.83
12.8%
30.4
In-school suspensions
136
20.1%
356
52.66
11.5%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
29
4.3%
44
6.51
7.1%
10.7
DAEP placements
13
1.9%
15
2.22
5.1%
6.1
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Fairview JH
Parent district: Alvin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,841
Selected comparison
$13,221
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
−$1,380 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,841 per student for this campus, $15,428 per student for its parent district, Alvin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Fairview JH
Parent district: Alvin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,894
$16,497
$13,054
$7,981
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,859 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,326
$15,630
$13,108
$8,142
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,401
$15,244
$14,058
$8,708
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,580
$16,183
$14,797
$9,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,750
$16,478
$15,708
$10,488
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,507
$17,598
$16,792
$11,203
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,844
$17,232
$18,125
$12,328
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,841
$15,428
$18,972
$13,221
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,693+$6,143 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+5.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−0.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Fairview JH
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 30.5%
6 to 10 years 14.3%
11 to 20 years 35.6%
21 to 30 years 7.3%
Over 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Brazoria County · 96 reporting for every category shown · 96 in full cohort
Beginning 4.6%
1 to 5 years 24.5%
6 to 10 years 21.4%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,411 reporting for every category shown · 4,411 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Fairview JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classFairview JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
16
17.9
Secondary English
15.5
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
23.8
17.7
Secondary math
13.8
16
Secondary science
14.8
17.4
Secondary social studies
16.2
17.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
91of 1,755
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,755 that report this measure · tied with 10
97of 1,755
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,755 that report this measure · tied with 18
103of 1,909
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,909 that report this measure · tied with 14
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 020901046.