Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Energy Institute HS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 698 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
97/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
16 of 1,773tied with 13 others
A97

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
80%vs 51.8% avg · +28.2 pts
Masters
38%vs 22.1% avg · +15.9 pts

Among 1,703 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
61%vs 45.5% avg · +15.5 pts
Masters
25%vs 18.2% avg · +6.8 pts

Among 1,693 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
88%vs 50.6% avg · +37.4 pts
Masters
61%vs 23.7% avg · +37.3 pts

Among 1,561 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Energy Institute HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 16th of 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEnergy Institute HS 9097959797 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9781.4 1,773 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9781.5 1,751 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9579.4 1,725 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9780.1 1,698 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9083.0 1,674 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement96 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 1,703 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+15.7 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps97 A+18.3 vs similar economic context · 1,681 reporting
  • Academic Growth67 D−8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,656 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+17.8 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
  • Energy Institute HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,773 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement96A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps97A—
Academic Growth67D3
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so Student Achievement (96) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level93%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
  • Meets grade level88%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
  • Masters grade level61%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
  • Masters grade level56%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,773 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
99.3%+6.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 450 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.3%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 446 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.8%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.0%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%88.3%+11.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 473 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course99.3%58.9%+40.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA80.1%28.3%+51.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)74.0%10.1%+63.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course8.9%33.3%−24.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification80.8%38.9%+41.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.8%−4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit4.1%4.3%−0.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.2%7.7%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.7%3.5%−2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
177

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
84

47.5% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
55

31.1% of graduates

Not trackable
38

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
177
Selected comparison
219.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
84
Selected comparison
95.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
47.5%
Selected comparison
45.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

+2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
31.1%
Selected comparison
50.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

−19.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
21.5%
Selected comparison
4.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

+16.9 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)20
  2. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)19
  3. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
698
Economically disadvantaged
53.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.4%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.6%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.5%−8.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Energy Institute HS

African American: 24.1%Hispanic: 39.7%White: 25.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.7%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 24.1%
  • Hispanic 39.7%
  • White 25.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.7%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting for every category shown · 1,773 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 43.1%White: 39.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 43.1%
  • White 39.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
698
Economically disadvantaged students
373
Emergent bilingual students
38
Special education students
88

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
677
TEA-published mobility rate
3.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 698 students in 2025–26, an increase of 35 (5.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
698

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+35

Increase · +5.3%

Change since 2021–22
+2

Increase · +0.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
698
Selected comparison
638.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Energy Institute HS
School yearStudents enrolledEnergy Institute HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 696 First available year 640.8
2022–23 676 Decrease of 20 (2.9%) 647.1
2023–24 663 Decrease of 13 (1.9%) 646.6
2024–25 663 No change 643.7
2025–26 698 Increase of 35 (5.3%) 638.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
40

6.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
76

11.34 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
670

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
6.0%
Selected comparison
12.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,376 rated schools reporting

−6.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
11.34
Selected comparison
27.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 rated schools reporting

−16.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Energy Institute HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 756 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 699 22 3.1% 38 5.44 12.3% 27.7
2022–23 672 35 5.2% 52 7.74 12.7% 29.5
2023–24 667 18 2.7% 24 3.60 12.7% 29.6
2024–25 670 40 6.0% 76 11.34 12.3% 27.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Energy Institute HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 40 6.0% 76 11.34 12.3% 27.6
In-school suspensions 25 3.7% 36 5.37 11.1% 21.3
Out-of-school suspensions 25 3.7% 34 5.07 6.2% 8.9
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Energy Institute HS
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,053
Selected comparison
$12,151

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting

−$3,098 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,053 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEnergy Institute HSParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,010$14,470$13,054$7,879 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting
2019$6,177$13,643$13,108$8,057 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,632 rated schools reporting
2020$6,464$13,627$14,058$8,602 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 rated schools reporting
2021$6,593$13,515$14,797$8,998 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
2022$7,866$14,985$15,708$10,267 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting
2023$8,286$16,350$16,792$10,840 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,698 rated schools reporting
2024$8,932$18,150$18,125$11,757 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,722 rated schools reporting
2025$9,053$17,026$18,972$12,151 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,180−$5,441 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42−0.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8−2.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Energy Institute HS

Beginning: 21.7%1 to 5 years: 37.8%6 to 10 years: 16.6%11 to 20 years: 14.2%21 to 30 years: 9.6%
  • Beginning 21.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 37.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting for every category shown · 1,773 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.5%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.5%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Energy Institute HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classEnergy Institute HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English13.114.9
Secondary languages other than English24.417.5
Secondary math22.315.9
Secondary science13.417.4
Secondary social studies14.117.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 3of 198

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Region 04: Houston · of the 198 that report this measure

  • 3of 136

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 6of 1,696

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,696 that report this measure · tied with 16

  • 6of 1,696

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,696 that report this measure · tied with 15

  • 6of 476

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 476 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

15 measures

  • 15of 1,561

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,561 that report this measure

  • 16of 1,773

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,773 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 17of 878

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 878 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 17of 476

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 476 that report this measure

  • 22of 878

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 878 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 23of 1,681

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,681 that report this measure · tied with 12

  • 24of 874

    Student Achievement

    Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 17

  • 29of 1,703

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,703 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 29of 1,561

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,561 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 34of 802

    Science — Approaches

    Harris County · of the 802 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 42of 1,719

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,719 that report this measure · tied with 12

  • 45of 1,703

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,703 that report this measure · tied with 16

  • 45of 1,701

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,701 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 63of 1,693

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,693 that report this measure · tied with 16

  • 78of 1,703

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,703 that report this measure · tied with 13

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912468.