+15.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
16 of 1,773tied with 13 others
Score vs region
+13.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
19 of 1,303tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+13.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
18 of 911tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+16.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,328 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
38 of 4,328tied with 22 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,328 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 51.8% avg · +28.2 pts
Masters
38%vs 22.1% avg · +15.9 pts
Among 1,703 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Energy Institute HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).
Energy Institute HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 18 others).
Energy Institute HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 13 others).
Energy Institute HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,328 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 38th of 4,328 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 22 others).
Energy Institute HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 1,703 reporting
School Progress97 A+15.7 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+18.3 vs similar economic context · 1,681 reporting
Academic Growth67 D−8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,656 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+17.8 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
Energy Institute HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,773 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
67
D
3
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so
Student Achievement (96) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
Meets grade level80%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
Masters grade level38%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
Meets grade level80%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
Masters grade level23%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Meets grade level61%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Masters grade level25%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Meets grade level88%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Masters grade level61%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
Meets grade level87%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
Masters grade level56%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,773 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
99.3%+6.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 450 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.3%+5.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 446 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.8%+5.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.0%+0.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
88.3%
+11.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 473 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
99.3%
58.9%
+40.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
80.1%
28.3%
+51.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
74.0%
10.1%
+63.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
8.9%
33.3%
−24.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
80.8%
38.9%
+41.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.8%
−4.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
4.1%
4.3%
−0.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
6.2%
7.7%
−1.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.7%
3.5%
−2.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
177
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
84
47.5% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
55
31.1% of graduates
Not trackable
38
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
177
Selected comparison
219.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
84
Selected comparison
95.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
47.5%
Selected comparison
45.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
31.1%
Selected comparison
50.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
−19.2 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
21.5%
Selected comparison
4.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
+16.9 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)20
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)19
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
698
Economically disadvantaged
53.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.4%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.6%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.5%−8.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Energy Institute HS
African American 24.1%
Hispanic 39.7%
White 25.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.7%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting for every category shown · 1,773 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 43.1%
White 39.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,328 reporting for every category shown · 4,328 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
698
Economically disadvantaged students
373
Emergent bilingual students
38
Special education students
88
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
677
TEA-published mobility rate
3.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 698 students in 2025–26, an increase of 35 (5.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
698
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+35
Increase · +5.3%
Change since 2021–22
+2
Increase · +0.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
698
Selected comparison
638.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Energy Institute HS
School year
Students enrolledEnergy Institute HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
696
First available year
640.8
2022–23
676
Decrease of 20 (2.9%)
647.1
2023–24
663
Decrease of 13 (1.9%)
646.6
2024–25
663
No change
643.7
2025–26
698
Increase of 35 (5.3%)
638.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
40
6.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
76
11.34 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
670
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.0%
Selected comparison
12.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,376 rated schools reporting
−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
11.34
Selected comparison
27.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 rated schools reporting
−16.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Energy Institute HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
756
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
699
22
3.1%
38
5.44
12.3%
27.7
2022–23
672
35
5.2%
52
7.74
12.7%
29.5
2023–24
667
18
2.7%
24
3.60
12.7%
29.6
2024–25
670
40
6.0%
76
11.34
12.3%
27.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Energy Institute HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
40
6.0%
76
11.34
12.3%
27.6
In-school suspensions
25
3.7%
36
5.37
11.1%
21.3
Out-of-school suspensions
25
3.7%
34
5.07
6.2%
8.9
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Energy Institute HS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,053
Selected comparison
$12,151
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting
−$3,098 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,053 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Energy Institute HS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,010
$14,470
$13,054
$7,879
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,177
$13,643
$13,108
$8,057
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,632 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,464
$13,627
$14,058
$8,602
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,593
$13,515
$14,797
$8,998
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,866
$14,985
$15,708
$10,267
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,286
$16,350
$16,792
$10,840
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,698 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,932
$18,150
$18,125
$11,757
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,722 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,053
$17,026
$18,972
$12,151
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,180−$5,441 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42−0.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8−2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Energy Institute HS
Beginning 21.7%
1 to 5 years 37.8%
6 to 10 years 16.6%
11 to 20 years 14.2%
21 to 30 years 9.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting for every category shown · 1,773 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,328 reporting for every category shown · 4,328 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Energy Institute HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classEnergy Institute HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
13.1
14.9
Secondary languages other than English
24.4
17.5
Secondary math
22.3
15.9
Secondary science
13.4
17.4
Secondary social studies
14.1
17.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
3of 198
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 04: Houston · of the 198 that report this measure
3of 136
Earned an industry-based certification
Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
6of 1,696
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,696 that report this measure · tied with 16
6of 1,696
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,696 that report this measure · tied with 15
6of 476
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 476 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
15 measures
15of 1,561
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,561 that report this measure
16of 1,773
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,773 that report this measure · tied with 13
17of 878
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 878 that report this measure · tied with 2
17of 476
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 476 that report this measure
22of 878
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 878 that report this measure · tied with 1
23of 1,681
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,681 that report this measure · tied with 12
24of 874
Student Achievement
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 17
29of 1,703
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,703 that report this measure · tied with 4
29of 1,561
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,561 that report this measure · tied with 5
34of 802
Science — Approaches
Harris County · of the 802 that report this measure · tied with 8
42of 1,719
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,719 that report this measure · tied with 12
45of 1,703
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,703 that report this measure · tied with 16
45of 1,701
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,701 that report this measure · tied with 6
63of 1,693
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,693 that report this measure · tied with 16
78of 1,703
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,703 that report this measure · tied with 13
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912468.