Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Eastwood Knolls International

El Paso County · Region 19: El Paso · 830 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.7 ptsvs 84.3 average · 1,361 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
172 of 1,361tied with 106 others
A92

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.3 average for 1,361 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
76%vs 58.2% avg · +17.8 pts
Masters
44%vs 26.8% avg · +17.2 pts

Among 1,321 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 51.8% avg · +23.2 pts
Masters
42%vs 22.3% avg · +19.7 pts

Among 1,315 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
77%vs 63% avg · +14 pts
Masters
46%vs 28.4% avg · +17.6 pts

Among 1,320 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Eastwood Knolls International is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.3 average for 1,361 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 172nd of 1,361 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 106 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEastwood Knolls International 9591919292 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9284.3 1,361 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9284.5 1,331 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9182.8 1,309 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9183.4 1,298 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9585.2 1,280 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement93 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,321 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+8.5 vs similar economic context · 1,317 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,307 reporting
  • Academic Growth91 A+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,294 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+11.4 vs similar economic context · 1,317 reporting
  • Eastwood Knolls International
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,361 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement93A—
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth91A—
Relative Performance91A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
  • Masters grade level44%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,320 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,320 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,320 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,315 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,315 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,315 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,222 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,222 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,222 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 689 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 689 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 689 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,361 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
830
Economically disadvantaged
40.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.4%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.2%−4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.5%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Eastwood Knolls International

African American: 0.4%Hispanic: 95.2%White: 3.2%Asian: 1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 0.1%
  • African American 0.4%
  • Hispanic 95.2%
  • White 3.2%
  • Asian 1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 0.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,361 reporting for every category shown · 1,361 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 35.5%White: 45.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 35.5%
  • White 45.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
825
Economically disadvantaged students
330
Emergent bilingual students
152
Special education students
109

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
31
Students in TEA mobility denominator
743
TEA-published mobility rate
4.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 830 students in 2025–26, an increase of 41 (5.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
830

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+41

Increase · +5.2%

Change since 2021–22
+22

Increase · +2.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
830
Selected comparison
694.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,330 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Eastwood Knolls International
School yearStudents enrolledEastwood Knolls InternationalChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 808 First available year 699
2022–23 804 Decrease of 4 (0.5%) 705.4
2023–24 808 Increase of 4 (0.5%) 705.8
2024–25 789 Decrease of 19 (2.4%) 700.2
2025–26 830 Increase of 41 (5.2%) 694.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10

1.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
25

3.10 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
807

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
1.2%
Selected comparison
10.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,049 rated schools reporting

−9.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.1
Selected comparison
23.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,130 rated schools reporting

−20.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Eastwood Knolls International
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 860 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 827 19 2.3% 26 3.14 10.9% 23.1
2022–23 824 22 2.7% 37 4.49 11.3% 24.5
2023–24 839 29 3.5% 52 6.20 11.1% 24.9
2024–25 807 10 1.2% 25 3.10 10.7% 23.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Eastwood Knolls International in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 10 1.2% 25 3.10 10.7% 23.2
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 13 1.61 — 17.9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Eastwood Knolls International
  • Parent district: Ysleta ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,338
Selected comparison
$12,003

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,332 rated schools reporting

−$1,665 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,338 per student for this campus, $16,357 per student for its parent district, Ysleta ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEastwood Knolls InternationalParent district: Ysleta ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,179$15,777$13,054$7,793 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,222 rated schools reporting
2019$7,150$14,422$13,108$7,996 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,239 rated schools reporting
2020$7,814$13,296$14,058$8,368 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,247 rated schools reporting
2021$7,843$15,128$14,797$8,759 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,265 rated schools reporting
2022$9,860$19,206$15,708$10,106 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,281 rated schools reporting
2023$9,877$20,106$16,792$10,539 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,298 rated schools reporting
2024$9,619$17,973$18,125$11,691 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,310 rated schools reporting
2025$10,338$16,357$18,972$12,003 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,332 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,011+$2,592 vs similar economic context
Teachers
54+7.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.3+1.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Eastwood Knolls International

Beginning: 1.9%1 to 5 years: 9.3%6 to 10 years: 13%11 to 20 years: 40.7%21 to 30 years: 31.5%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 1.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 9.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 13%
  • 11 to 20 years 40.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 31.5%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,361 reporting for every category shown · 1,361 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Eastwood Knolls International in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classEastwood Knolls International · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.818.2
Grade 118.518.7
Grade 218.218.9
Grade 322.219.6
Grade 420.219.3
Grade 522.620.7
Grade 61918.1
Secondary English13.515.7
Secondary languages other than English1718.1
Secondary math18.516.7
Secondary science22.118.1
Secondary social studies22.118.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 201

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 200

    Math — Meets

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 200

    Math — Masters

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure

  • 3of 197

    Science — Masters

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 197 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 7of 201

    Reading — Masters

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 201

    Student Achievement

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure

  • 8of 201

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 201

    All Subjects — Meets

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure

  • 8of 200

    Math — Approaches

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure · tied with 2

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 11of 201

    Reading — Meets

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071905106.