Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Earl & Lottie Wolford ElemA92vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 422 students
Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.7 ptsvs 89.3 average · 816 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
237 of 816tied with 93 others
Score vs region
+9.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
161 of 1,157tied with 55 others
Score vs county
+5.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
75 of 307tied with 30 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,208 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
364 of 4,208tied with 139 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89.3 average for 816 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,208 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
76%vs 69.4% avg · +6.6 pts
Masters
45%vs 38.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Among 803 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89.3 average for 816 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 237th of 816 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 93 others).
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 161st of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 55 others).
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 75th of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 30 others).
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,208 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 364th of 4,208 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 139 others).
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+2.8 vs similar economic context · 803 reporting
School Progress91 A+5.4 vs similar economic context · 801 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+4.2 vs similar economic context · 798 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+8.0 vs similar economic context · 792 reporting
Relative Performance84 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 801 reporting
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (816 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
84
B
6
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 reporting
Meets grade level76%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 reporting
Masters grade level45%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 reporting
Meets grade level79%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 reporting
Masters grade level51%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 801 reporting
Meets grade level73%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 801 reporting
Masters grade level42%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 801 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 743 reporting
Meets grade level76%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 743 reporting
Masters grade level37%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 743 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (816 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
422
Economically disadvantaged
21.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.4%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.8%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 16.9%
White 54.2%
Asian 6.9%
Two or More Races 9.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting for every category shown · 816 in full cohort
African American 7.9%
Hispanic 25.3%
White 48.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 12.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,208 reporting for every category shown · 4,208 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 55%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
419
Economically disadvantaged students
90
Emergent bilingual students
35
Special education students
104
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
27
Students in TEA mobility denominator
352
TEA-published mobility rate
7.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 422 students in 2025–26, an increase of 33 (8.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
422
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+33
Increase · +8.5%
Change since 2021–22
+27
Increase · +6.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
422
Selected comparison
872.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
School year
Students enrolledEarl & Lottie Wolford Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
395
First available year
889.8
2022–23
405
Increase of 10 (2.5%)
895.4
2023–24
412
Increase of 7 (1.7%)
889.1
2024–25
389
Decrease of 23 (5.6%)
882.5
2025–26
422
Increase of 33 (8.5%)
872.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
4.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
35
8.60 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
407
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.4%
Selected comparison
7.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 573 rated schools reporting
−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
8.6
Selected comparison
14.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 654 rated schools reporting
−5.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
421
Suppressed
—
18
4.28
—
9.3
2021–22
417
17
4.1%
38
9.11
7.5%
14.8
2022–23
423
12
2.8%
32
7.57
7.8%
15.1
2023–24
424
Suppressed
—
20
4.72
—
14.7
2024–25
407
18
4.4%
35
8.60
7.3%
14.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
4.4%
35
8.60
7.3%
14.1
In-school suspensions
10
2.5%
14
3.44
6.7%
11.2
Out-of-school suspensions
11
2.7%
19
4.67
3.5%
4.7
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
Parent district: McKinney ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,086
Selected comparison
$11,040
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 rated schools reporting
+$46 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,086 per student for this campus, $19,167 per student for its parent district, McKinney ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
Parent district: McKinney ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,744
$15,035
$13,054
$7,412
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 717 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,421
$14,139
$13,108
$7,474
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 733 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,454
$13,857
$14,058
$7,806
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 743 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,172
$14,616
$14,797
$8,355
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 749 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,603
$15,658
$15,708
$9,388
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 766 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,281
$17,299
$16,792
$9,898
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 781 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,880
$17,901
$18,125
$10,989
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 796 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,086
$19,167
$18,972
$11,040
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,054+$4,260 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−25.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem
Beginning 3.3%
1 to 5 years 14.5%
6 to 10 years 13.2%
11 to 20 years 46.1%
21 to 30 years 23%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting for every category shown · 816 in full cohort
Beginning 4.7%
1 to 5 years 22.7%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 32.5%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,208 reporting for every category shown · 4,208 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Earl & Lottie Wolford Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classEarl & Lottie Wolford Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.7
18.8
Grade 1
18.3
19.1
Grade 2
23.1
19.7
Grade 3
35.3
21.2
Grade 4
38.3
20.3
Grade 5
35.3
21.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
197of 3,960
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,960 that report this measure · tied with 26
201of 3,960
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,960 that report this measure · tied with 22
218of 3,960
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,960 that report this measure · tied with 20
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043907116.