Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Eagle Mountain HS

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 1,302 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
80/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
−5.2 ptsvs 85.2 average · 1,260 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
944 of 1,260tied with 38 others
B80

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is below the 85.2 average for 1,260 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 23 points

58 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 81 is 2.3 points above the 78.7 average among 1,200 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Eagle Mountain HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.2 average for 1,260 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2024-25.

Ranks 944th of 1,260 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 38 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEagle Mountain HS 7480 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8085.2 1,260 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7485.3 1,234 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement79 C−6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,226 reporting
  • School Progress81 B−2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,222 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C−3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,212 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,200 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,222 reporting
  • Eagle Mountain HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,260 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement79C1
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,226 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,226 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,226 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,225 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,225 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,225 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,123 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,123 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,123 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 645 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 645 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 645 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,260 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−92.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−92.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−91.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,302
Economically disadvantaged
37.3%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.6%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.4%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.2%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.0%+10.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Eagle Mountain HS

African American: 23.1%Hispanic: 33.5%White: 34.6%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 4.5%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 23.1%
  • Hispanic 33.5%
  • White 34.6%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 4.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,260 reporting for every category shown · 1,260 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 33.7%White: 46.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.6%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 33.7%
  • White 46.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,302
Economically disadvantaged students
486
Emergent bilingual students
138
Special education students
136

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
152
Students in TEA mobility denominator
992
TEA-published mobility rate
15.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,302 students in 2025–26, an increase of 411 (46.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,302

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+411

Increase · +46.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,302
Selected comparison
729.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,231 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Eagle Mountain HS
School yearStudents enrolledEagle Mountain HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 891 First available year 737.3
2025–26 1,302 Increase of 411 (46.1%) 729.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
165

17.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
397

41.05 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
967

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
17.1%
Selected comparison
10.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 976 rated schools reporting

+6.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
41.05
Selected comparison
22.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 rated schools reporting

+18.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Eagle Mountain HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 967 165 17.1% 397 41.05 10.4% 22.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Eagle Mountain HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 165 17.1% 397 41.05 10.4% 22.3
In-school suspensions 139 14.4% 279 28.85 9.3% 17.1
Out-of-school suspensions 62 6.4% 91 9.41 5.1% 7
DAEP placements 25 2.6% 27 2.79 3.7% 4.4
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$10k$15k$21k2025
  • Eagle Mountain HS
  • Parent district: Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,037
Selected comparison
$11,884

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,234 rated schools reporting

−$847 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,037 per student for this campus, $19,796 per student for its parent district, Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEagle Mountain HSParent district: Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$11,037$19,796$18,972$11,884 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,234 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,141+$514 vs similar economic context
Teachers
78+29.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.7+2.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Eagle Mountain HS

Beginning: 3.8%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 38.1%21 to 30 years: 11.3%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 3.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 38.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,260 reporting for every category shown · 1,260 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 23%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 31.3%21 to 30 years: 17.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Eagle Mountain HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classEagle Mountain HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English18.516.1
Secondary languages other than English19.818.5
Secondary math19.817.1
Secondary science21.818.5
Secondary social studies24.518.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220918008.