Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Dyess Elem

Taylor County · Region 14: Abilene · 634 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−11.6 ptsvs 80.6 average · 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,688 of 1,944tied with 66 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 73 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.6 average for 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

11% −5.2 pts vs 16.2%

  • 11% is 5.2 percentage points lower than the 16.2% average among 1,886 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Dyess Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.6 average for 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,688th of 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDyess Elem 7587767469 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 73 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6980.6 1,944 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7480.3 1,921 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7678.3 1,901 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8778.8 1,871 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7582.4 1,847 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,858 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−9.3 vs similar economic context · 1,851 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps63 D−14.8 vs similar economic context · 1,833 reporting
  • Academic Growth63 D−11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,796 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,851 reporting
  • Dyess Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,944 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps63D7
Academic Growth63D7
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level68%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,944 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
634
Economically disadvantaged
61.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.7%−13.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.4%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.0%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Dyess Elem

African American: 15.9%Hispanic: 33.6%White: 38.8%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 9.3%
  • African American 15.9%
  • Hispanic 33.6%
  • White 38.8%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 9.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting for every category shown · 1,944 in full cohort

African American: 10.5%Hispanic: 49.2%White: 33.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.5%
  • Hispanic 49.2%
  • White 33.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
634
Economically disadvantaged students
389
Emergent bilingual students
17
Special education students
155

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
148
Students in TEA mobility denominator
578
TEA-published mobility rate
25.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 634 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (2.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
634

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+13

Increase · +2.1%

Change since 2021–22
+39

Increase · +6.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
634
Selected comparison
621.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Dyess Elem
School yearStudents enrolledDyess ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 595 First available year 634.3
2022–23 617 Increase of 22 (3.7%) 639.1
2023–24 592 Decrease of 25 (4.1%) 636.4
2024–25 621 Increase of 29 (4.9%) 632.4
2025–26 634 Increase of 13 (2.1%) 621.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
57

8.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
135

19.68 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
686

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
8.3%
Selected comparison
12.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting

−4.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
19.68
Selected comparison
29.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 rated schools reporting

−9.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Dyess Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 547 Suppressed — 18 3.29 — 19.1
2021–22 692 Suppressed — 36 5.20 — 29
2022–23 674 39 5.8% 86 12.76 13.1% 30.9
2023–24 656 72 11.0% 196 29.88 13.0% 30.6
2024–25 686 57 8.3% 135 19.68 12.7% 29.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Dyess Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 57 8.3% 135 19.68 12.7% 29.1
In-school suspensions 55 8.0% 116 16.91 11.5% 22.5
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 11 1.60 — 9.8
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Dyess Elem
  • Parent district: Abilene ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,953
Selected comparison
$12,539

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting

−$4,586 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,953 per student for this campus, $14,136 per student for its parent district, Abilene ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDyess ElemParent district: Abilene ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,361$10,118$13,054$7,933 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,779 rated schools reporting
2019$6,644$11,313$13,108$8,078 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 rated schools reporting
2020$7,354$14,875$14,058$8,689 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 rated schools reporting
2021$10,556$15,669$14,797$9,110 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 rated schools reporting
2022$13,244$15,331$15,708$10,486 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting
2023$7,849$15,783$16,792$11,133 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 rated schools reporting
2024$7,926$14,106$18,125$11,959 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 rated schools reporting
2025$7,953$14,136$18,972$12,539 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,824−$4,554 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−6.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.7−1.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Dyess Elem

Beginning: 2.8%1 to 5 years: 30.7%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 30.4%21 to 30 years: 13.7%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 2.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.7%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting for every category shown · 1,944 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.1%1 to 5 years: 25.7%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.1%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.1%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Dyess Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDyess Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.718
Grade 120.818.2
Grade 21918.4
Grade 322.318.6
Grade 419.418.9
Grade 522.719.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221901108.