+4.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
760 of 2,106tied with 91 others
Score vs region
+1.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi
Region 02: Corpus Christi placement
93 of 191tied with 11 others
Score vs county
−0.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 97 rated schools in Nueces County
Nueces County placement
54 of 97tied with 8 others
Score vs similar-size group
+1.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 2,356 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,103 of 2,356tied with 87 others
Score vs state
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is below the 82.5 average for 97 rated schools in Nueces County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 2,356 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
48%vs 40.5% avg · +7.5 pts
Masters
20%vs 16.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Among 1,955 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Driscoll Elem & MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 760th of 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 91 others).
Driscoll Elem & MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 93rd of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 11 others).
Driscoll Elem & MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.5 average for 97 rated schools in Nueces County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 54th of 97 rated schools in Nueces County (tied with 8 others).
Driscoll Elem & MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 2,356 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,103rd of 2,356 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 87 others).
Driscoll Elem & MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement76 C+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,955 reporting
School Progress85 B+6.3 vs similar economic context · 1,952 reporting
Closing the Gaps74 C−0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,938 reporting
Academic Growth74 C+0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,921 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,951 reporting
Driscoll Elem & MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,106 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
76
C
4
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
74
C
6
Academic Growth
74
C
6
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level76%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting
Meets grade level48%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting
Masters grade level20%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 reporting
Meets grade level56%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 reporting
Masters grade level28%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting
Meets grade level40%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting
Masters grade level10%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Meets grade level58%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Masters grade level32%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level57%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 reporting
Meets grade level33%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 reporting
Masters grade level10%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,106 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
278
Economically disadvantaged
92.4%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.2%−33.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.3%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.4%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.3%−19.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Driscoll Elem & MS
Hispanic 92.1%
White 7.2%
Two or More Races 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting for every category shown · 2,106 in full cohort
African American 14.9%
Hispanic 76.4%
White 5.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 77.5%
White 17.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Nueces County · 97 reporting for every category shown · 97 in full cohort
African American 3%
Hispanic 77.7%
White 15.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,356 reporting for every category shown · 2,356 in full cohort
African American 10.5%
Hispanic 51.9%
White 32.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
278
Economically disadvantaged students
257
Emergent bilingual students
20
Special education students
37
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
30
Students in TEA mobility denominator
241
TEA-published mobility rate
12.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 278 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (3.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
278
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−11
Decrease · −3.8%
Change since 2021–22
+1
Increase · +0.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
278
Selected comparison
570.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Driscoll Elem & MS
School year
Students enrolledDriscoll Elem & MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
277
First available year
615.2
2022–23
287
Increase of 10 (3.6%)
611.7
2023–24
281
Decrease of 6 (2.1%)
601.9
2024–25
289
Increase of 8 (2.8%)
595.3
2025–26
278
Decrease of 11 (3.8%)
570.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14
4.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
18
5.79 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
311
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.5%
Selected comparison
13.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,274 rated schools reporting
−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
5.79
Selected comparison
31.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 rated schools reporting
−25.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Driscoll Elem & MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
311
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
301
Suppressed
—
10
3.32
—
30
2022–23
299
Suppressed
—
13
4.35
—
33
2023–24
300
19
6.3%
33
11.00
13.7%
33.2
2024–25
311
14
4.5%
18
5.79
13.1%
31.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Driscoll Elem & MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
14
4.5%
18
5.79
13.1%
31.2
In-school suspensions
14
4.5%
15
4.82
11.4%
22.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Driscoll Elem & MS
Parent district: Driscoll ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,602
Selected comparison
$13,207
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,086 rated schools reporting
−$1,605 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,602 per student for this campus, $17,314 per student for its parent district, Driscoll ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Driscoll Elem & MS
Parent district: Driscoll ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,296
$13,686
$13,054
$8,318
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,812
$15,049
$13,108
$8,336
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,014 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,283
$25,257
$14,058
$8,839
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,064
$19,011
$14,797
$9,650
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,021 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,674
$18,679
$15,708
$11,226
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,732
$19,978
$16,792
$11,730
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,258
$17,669
$18,125
$12,652
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,602
$17,314
$18,972
$13,207
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,086 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,266+$1,993 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−14.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.7−3.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Driscoll Elem & MS
Beginning 3.8%
1 to 5 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 26.9%
21 to 30 years 42.3%
Over 30 years 7.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting for every category shown · 2,106 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Nueces County · 97 reporting for every category shown · 97 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,356 reporting for every category shown · 2,356 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Driscoll Elem & MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classDriscoll Elem & MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22
18.1
Grade 1
14
18.4
Grade 2
13
18.3
Grade 3
13
18.5
Grade 4
12.7
18.5
Grade 5
16.2
19.3
Grade 6
16.7
17.3
Secondary English
15.3
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
8
18.3
Secondary math
15.5
16.7
Secondary science
16.5
17.7
Secondary social studies
16.5
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 87
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Nueces County · of the 87 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 87
Attendance
Nueces County · of the 87 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
58of 1,954
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,954 that report this measure · tied with 12
96of 1,839
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,839 that report this measure · tied with 12
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 178905041.