Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem

Fort Bend County · Region 04: Houston · 489 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
66/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−11.7 ptsvs 77.7 average · 2,145 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,859 of 2,145tied with 38 others
D66

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.7 average for 2,145 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 47.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Masters
20%vs 18.4% avg · +1.6 pts

Among 1,980 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

17.7% −2.8 pts vs 20.5%

  • 17.7% is 2.8 percentage points lower than the 20.5% average among 2,057 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.7 average for 2,145 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,859th of 2,145 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 38 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDr Lynn Armstrong Elem 6977598666 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6677.7 2,145 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8677.5 2,133 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5974.9 2,118 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7775.4 2,101 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6981.6 2,081 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement62 D−10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,982 reporting
  • School Progress65 D−14.0 vs similar economic context · 1,976 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps68 D−6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,962 reporting
  • Academic Growth58 F−14.2 vs similar economic context · 1,926 reporting
  • Relative Performance65 D−12.4 vs similar economic context · 1,976 reporting
  • Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,145 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement62D8
School Progress65D5
Closing the Gaps68D2
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance65D5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (65), so Student Achievement (62) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 65.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level58%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level50%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,145 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
489
Economically disadvantaged
79.3%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
49.7%+21.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.1%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.9%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.7%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem

African American: 22.1%Hispanic: 66.7%White: 6.3%American Indian: 2%Asian: 1.6%Two or More Races: 1.2%
  • African American 22.1%
  • Hispanic 66.7%
  • White 6.3%
  • American Indian 2%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Two or More Races 1.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,145 reporting for every category shown · 2,145 in full cohort

African American: 14%Hispanic: 66.7%White: 14.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 14%
  • Hispanic 66.7%
  • White 14.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
489
Economically disadvantaged students
388
Emergent bilingual students
243
Special education students
108

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
71
Students in TEA mobility denominator
442
TEA-published mobility rate
16.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 489 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 28 (5.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
489

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−28

Decrease · −5.4%

Change since 2021–22
+32

Increase · +7.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
489
Selected comparison
634.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,114 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem
School yearStudents enrolledDr Lynn Armstrong ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 457 First available year 657.2
2022–23 438 Decrease of 19 (4.2%) 660.9
2023–24 515 Increase of 77 (17.6%) 656
2024–25 517 Increase of 2 (0.4%) 652.7
2025–26 489 Decrease of 28 (5.4%) 634.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
25

4.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
38

6.93 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
548

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.6%
Selected comparison
13.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 rated schools reporting

−8.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.93
Selected comparison
32.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 rated schools reporting

−25.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 504 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 487 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 495 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 568 12 2.1% 24 4.23 13.7% 34.2
2024–25 548 25 4.6% 38 6.93 13.4% 32.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 25 4.6% 38 6.93 13.4% 32.7
In-school suspensions 23 4.2% 34 6.20 11.8% 23.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem
  • Parent district: Fort Bend ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,454
Selected comparison
$13,044

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,132 rated schools reporting

+$2,410 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,454 per student for this campus, $18,181 per student for its parent district, Fort Bend ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDr Lynn Armstrong ElemParent district: Fort Bend ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,005$14,055$13,054$8,107 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,016 rated schools reporting
2019$9,555$13,701$13,108$8,241 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 rated schools reporting
2020$11,654$15,136$14,058$8,755 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,052 rated schools reporting
2021$13,847$15,034$14,797$9,391 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting
2022$12,184$15,054$15,708$10,806 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 rated schools reporting
2023$14,179$13,283$16,792$11,273 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,101 rated schools reporting
2024$11,841$14,142$18,125$12,263 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,118 rated schools reporting
2025$15,454$18,181$18,972$13,044 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,132 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,975+$990 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44+1.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11−3.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem

Beginning: 8.8%1 to 5 years: 33.1%6 to 10 years: 21.8%11 to 20 years: 29.3%21 to 30 years: 6.8%
  • Beginning 8.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,145 reporting for every category shown · 2,145 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Dr Lynn Armstrong Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDr Lynn Armstrong Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.818
Grade 11718.4
Grade 218.518.4
Grade 316.718.9
Grade 420.519
Grade 52020

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079907144.