txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Douglass Eclc

Hopkins County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 217 students

C77

Douglass Eclc is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average of the 2,028 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 2 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 88.

Ranks 5,228th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 203 others), and 101st of 142 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 8 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Spending per student
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
90807060 Schools like this oneTexas averageDouglass Eclc 7980798177 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26C7777.681.3
2024-25B8177.381.2
2023-24C7973.878.9
2022-23B8073.379.1
2021-22C7981.983.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Douglass Eclc itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student AchievementNot reported · similar 70.2 · region 79.6
  • School ProgressNot reported · similar 78.7 · region 82.6
  • Closing the GapsNot reported · similar 74.9 · region 78.2
  • Academic GrowthNot reported · similar 73.1 · region 72.6
  • Relative PerformanceNot reported · similar 76.7 · region 80.7
  • Douglass Eclc
  • Similar student population (2,028)
  • Region 08: Mt Pleasant (142)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student AchievementNot rated
School ProgressNot rated
Closing the GapsNot rated
Academic GrowthNot rated
Relative PerformanceNot rated

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
217
Economically disadvantaged
93.1%+1.8 pts vs similar
English learners
18.4%−22.6 pts vs similar
Special education
8.8%−8.8 pts vs similar
Attendance
Chronically absent

Student demographics

African American: 13.4%Hispanic: 41.9%White: 33.6%American Indian: 1.4%Asian: 0.5%Two or More Races: 9.2%
  • African American 13.4%
  • Hispanic 41.9%
  • White 33.6%
  • American Indian 1.4%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 9.2%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$10k$16k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Douglass Eclc
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$60,896−$7,448 vs similar
Teachers
17
Students per staff member
12.8

Teaching experience

1 to 5 years: 47.1%6 to 10 years: 17.6%11 to 20 years: 35.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.3%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 12 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 4of 15

    Per-student spending

    Hopkins County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 5

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 112901107.