Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Douglass Eclc

Hopkins County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 218 students

Current score
77/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,150 of 2,028tied with 65 others
C77

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Douglass Eclc is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,150th of 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Enrollment over time
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDouglass Eclc 7980798177 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7777.6 2,028 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8177.3 2,010 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7973.8 1,992 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8073.3 1,986 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7981.9 1,961 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.2 · 1,880 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.7 · 1,877 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.9 · 1,866 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.1 · 1,850 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.7 · 1,876 reporting
  • Douglass Eclc
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,028 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
218
Economically disadvantaged
93.1%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.4%−22.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.8%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Douglass Eclc

African American: 13.4%Hispanic: 41.9%White: 33.6%American Indian: 1.4%Asian: 0.5%Two or More Races: 9.2%
  • African American 13.4%
  • Hispanic 41.9%
  • White 33.6%
  • American Indian 1.4%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 9.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting for every category shown · 2,028 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 76.5%White: 5.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 76.5%
  • White 5.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
217
Economically disadvantaged students
202
Emergent bilingual students
40
Special education students
19

TEA context labels

  • Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 218 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (2.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
218

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−5

Decrease · −2.2%

Change since 2021–22
−12

Decrease · −5.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
218
Selected comparison
568.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,007 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Douglass Eclc
School yearStudents enrolledDouglass EclcChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 230 First available year 614.5
2022–23 225 Decrease of 5 (2.2%) 610.6
2023–24 235 Increase of 10 (4.4%) 600.8
2024–25 223 Decrease of 12 (5.1%) 594.1
2025–26 218 Decrease of 5 (2.2%) 568.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
258

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Douglass Eclc
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 248 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 246 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 251 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 266 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 258 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Douglass Eclc in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Douglass Eclc
  • Parent district: Sulphur Springs ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,029
Selected comparison
$13,188

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting

+$1,841 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,029 per student for this campus, $21,394 per student for its parent district, Sulphur Springs ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDouglass EclcParent district: Sulphur Springs ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,180$11,397$13,054$8,328 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 rated schools reporting
2019$10,030$11,226$13,108$8,347 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 rated schools reporting
2020$11,651$11,398$14,058$8,846 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2021$13,574$12,450$14,797$9,662 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 rated schools reporting
2022$13,127$13,163$15,708$11,250 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2023$14,002$13,135$16,792$11,782 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,985 rated schools reporting
2024$13,402$14,094$18,125$12,656 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,995 rated schools reporting
2025$15,029$21,394$18,972$13,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$60,896−$7,448 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−22.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−1.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Douglass Eclc

1 to 5 years: 47.1%6 to 10 years: 17.6%11 to 20 years: 35.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting for every category shown · 2,028 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 10 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 4of 15

    Per-student spending

    Hopkins County · of the 15 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 112901107.