Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ditto Elem

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 706 students

Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
−12 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−3.5 ptsvs 84.5 average · 1,323 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
889 of 1,323tied with 50 others
B81

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 84.5 average for 1,323 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

80 +2.1 pts vs 77.9

  • 80 is 2.1 points above the 77.9 average among 1,259 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

8.7% −3.8 pts vs 12.5%

  • 8.7% is 3.8 percentage points lower than the 12.5% average among 1,282 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ditto Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.5 average for 1,323 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 889th of 1,323 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDitto Elem 9390888781 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8184.5 1,323 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8784.7 1,295 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8883.0 1,273 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9083.5 1,261 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9385.3 1,242 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement85 B±0.0 vs similar economic context · 1,284 reporting
  • School Progress80 B−2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,280 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−9.8 vs similar economic context · 1,270 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,259 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,280 reporting
  • Ditto Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,323 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement85B5
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so School Progress (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,283 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,283 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,283 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,278 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,278 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,278 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,187 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,187 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,187 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,323 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
706
Economically disadvantaged
39.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.1%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.7%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ditto Elem

African American: 12.8%Hispanic: 25.5%White: 47.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 6.8%Two or More Races: 6.7%
  • African American 12.8%
  • Hispanic 25.5%
  • White 47.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 6.8%
  • Two or More Races 6.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,323 reporting for every category shown · 1,323 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 35.1%White: 46.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 35.1%
  • White 46.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
705
Economically disadvantaged students
277
Emergent bilingual students
78
Special education students
113

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
53
Students in TEA mobility denominator
624
TEA-published mobility rate
8.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 706 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 28 (3.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
706

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−28

Decrease · −3.8%

Change since 2021–22
+21

Increase · +3.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
706
Selected comparison
703.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,291 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ditto Elem
School yearStudents enrolledDitto ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 685 First available year 710.5
2022–23 726 Increase of 41 (6.0%) 714.7
2023–24 734 Increase of 8 (1.1%) 714.3
2024–25 734 No change 708.8
2025–26 706 Decrease of 28 (3.8%) 703.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
28

3.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
57

7.45 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
765

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
10.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,019 rated schools reporting

−6.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
7.45
Selected comparison
22.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,104 rated schools reporting

−15.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ditto Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 735 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 721 20 2.8% 37 5.13 10.8% 22.8
2022–23 748 24 3.2% 41 5.48 11.2% 24.1
2023–24 763 19 2.5% 37 4.85 10.9% 24.5
2024–25 765 28 3.7% 57 7.45 10.6% 22.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ditto Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 28 3.7% 57 7.45 10.6% 22.8
In-school suspensions 27 3.5% 49 6.41 9.5% 17.6
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Ditto Elem
  • Parent district: Arlington ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,442
Selected comparison
$12,025

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,296 rated schools reporting

−$3,583 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,442 per student for this campus, $18,997 per student for its parent district, Arlington ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDitto ElemParent district: Arlington ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,477$13,175$13,054$7,779 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 rated schools reporting
2019$8,386$11,881$13,108$7,980 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,201 rated schools reporting
2020$10,806$12,353$14,058$8,337 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,208 rated schools reporting
2021$7,137$14,707$14,797$8,748 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,225 rated schools reporting
2022$8,411$15,494$15,708$10,039 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,243 rated schools reporting
2023$8,522$15,882$16,792$10,560 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,261 rated schools reporting
2024$7,938$17,946$18,125$11,791 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,274 rated schools reporting
2025$8,442$18,997$18,972$12,025 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,296 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$75,050+$7,614 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45−1.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.7+1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ditto Elem

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 15.6%6 to 10 years: 24.7%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 20.7%Over 30 years: 2.2%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 15.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.7%
  • Over 30 years 2.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,323 reporting for every category shown · 1,323 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.1%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ditto Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDitto Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1918.2
Grade 12118.7
Grade 220.218.9
Grade 31919.6
Grade 421.319.3
Grade 524.820.8
Grade 619.718.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220901130.