Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Disciplinary Alternative Education Program

Liberty County · Region 04: Houston · 73 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Disciplinary Alternative Education Program for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Disciplinary Alternative Education Program for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—77.6 2,019 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.3 2,001 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—73.8 1,983 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—73.3 1,977 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.9 1,952 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.2 · 1,871 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.7 · 1,868 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.9 · 1,857 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.1 · 1,841 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.7 · 1,867 reporting
  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,019 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 66.4% · 1,871 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 40.5% · 1,871 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 16.1% · 1,871 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 65.9% · 1,866 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 38.8% · 1,866 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15% · 1,866 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,019 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
73
Economically disadvantaged
93.2%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
60.3%+19.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.7%−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
85.1%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
45.7%+22.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Disciplinary Alternative Education Program

African American: 8.2%Hispanic: 80.8%White: 9.6%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 8.2%
  • Hispanic 80.8%
  • White 9.6%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting for every category shown · 2,019 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 76.5%White: 5.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.5%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 76.5%
  • White 5.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
73
Economically disadvantaged students
68
Emergent bilingual students
44
Special education students
10

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
690
Students in TEA mobility denominator
698
TEA-published mobility rate
98.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 73 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 53 (42.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
73

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−53

Decrease · −42.1%

Change since 2021–22
0

No change

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
73
Selected comparison
568.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,998 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Disciplinary Alternative Education Program
School yearStudents enrolledDisciplinary Alternative Education ProgramChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 73 First available year 614.5
2022–23 68 Decrease of 5 (6.8%) 610.7
2023–24 109 Increase of 41 (60.3%) 600.7
2024–25 126 Increase of 17 (15.6%) 594
2025–26 73 Decrease of 53 (42.1%) 568.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
140

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
221

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Disciplinary Alternative Education Program
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 Not reported 38 — 45 — — —
2022–23 Not reported 90 — 106 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 185 — 327 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 140 — 221 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Disciplinary Alternative Education Program in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 140 — 221 — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 76 — 123 — — —
DAEP placements 86 — 92 — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements 66 — 71 — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements 21 — 21 — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$44k$82k20182020202220242025
  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program
  • Parent district: Cleveland ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,515
Selected comparison
$13,188

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting

+$327 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,515 per student for this campus, $14,239 per student for its parent district, Cleveland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDisciplinary Alternative Education ProgramParent district: Cleveland ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$65,753$14,253$13,054$8,329 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 rated schools reporting
2019$18,171$17,781$13,108$8,346 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,929 rated schools reporting
2020$13,123$15,481$14,058$8,845 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 rated schools reporting
2021$78,110$19,788$14,797$9,664 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 rated schools reporting
2022$10,881$21,746$15,708$11,236 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 rated schools reporting
2023$16,663$17,408$16,792$11,784 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
2024$12,160$15,241$18,125$12,661 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
2025$13,515$14,239$18,972$13,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$70,094+$1,749 vs similar economic context
Teachers
9−30.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.8−6.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Disciplinary Alternative Education Program

Beginning: 10.8%1 to 5 years: 14%6 to 10 years: 10.8%11 to 20 years: 43%21 to 30 years: 20.4%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 10.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 14%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 43%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.4%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting for every category shown · 2,019 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 146901003.