txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Digital Academy of Texas

Bowie County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 859 students

B81

Digital Academy of Texas is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.9 average of the 1,733 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and level with the statewide average of 81.3. It is up 22 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 59.

Ranks 4,141st of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 260 others), and 78th of 142 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 6 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
9080706050 Schools like this oneTexas averageDigital Academy of Texas 5964757681 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 59 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26B8181.981.3
2024-25C7682.081.2
2023-24C7580.078.9
2022-23D6480.779.1
2021-22F5983.383.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Digital Academy of Texas itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement78 C−3.4 vs similar · −1.6 vs region
  • School Progress84 B+2.5 vs similar · +1.4 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps73 C−6.2 vs similar · −5.2 vs region
  • Academic Growth57 F−18.6 vs similar · −15.6 vs region
  • Relative Performance84 B+4.7 vs similar · +3.3 vs region
  • Digital Academy of Texas
  • Similar student population (1,733)
  • Region 08: Mt Pleasant (142)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement78C2
School Progress84B6
Closing the Gaps73C7
Academic Growth57F3
Relative Performance84B6

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (84), so Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 84.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+6 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level56%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level18%−5 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level92%+13 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level71%+13 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level23%−2 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level71%−3 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level35%−11 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level14%−5 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level82%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level59%+8 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level19%−5 vs Similar student population

Social Studies

  • Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level53%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level14%−9 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (1,733)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,733 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
90.6%−2.7 pts vs similar
Five-Year
68.8%−24.3 pts vs similar
Six-Year
42.1%−50.4 pts vs similar
Dropout Rate
2.9%+2.5 pts vs similar

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis schoolsimilarGap
Total credit for CCMR criteria85.0%88.1%−3.1
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course54.3%59.2%−4.9
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA12.3%29.3%−17.0
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)6.2%10.6%−4.4
Earned college credit for a dual credit course8.6%33.5%−24.9
Earned an industry-based certification34.6%38.2%−3.6
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.6%−4.6
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.5%−4.5
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.1%−3.1
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.2%7.5%−1.3
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.5%3.5%−1.0

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
859
Economically disadvantaged
51.1%−0.6 pts vs similar
English learners
7.3%−6.0 pts vs similar
Special education
6.2%−12.6 pts vs similar
Attendance
100.0%+5.5 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
0.0%−14.6 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 11.6%Hispanic: 30%White: 49.1%American Indian: 1.2%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 11.6%
  • Hispanic 30%
  • White 49.1%
  • American Indian 1.2%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$11k$22k$34k2020202220242025
  • Digital Academy of Texas
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 1of 7,366

    Attendance

    Texas average · of the 7,366 that report this measure · tied with 18 · ranking (top 1,500 shown)

  • 1of 7,358

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · ranking (bottom 1,500 shown)

  • 1of 1,682

    Attendance

    Similar student population · of the 1,682 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 1of 1,682

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar student population · of the 1,682 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 1of 134

    Attendance

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 134 that report this measure

  • 1of 134

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 134 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 39

    Attendance

    Bowie County · of the 39 that report this measure

  • 1of 39

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Bowie County · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 11

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 38

    Reading — Approaches

    Bowie County · of the 38 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 019907006.